A Ten Year Assessment of the Pre-Engineering Program for Under-Represented, Low Income and/or First Generation College Students at the University of Akron.

This paper summarizes the findings of a ten year study on a Pre-Engineering program aimed at dramatically improving both the recruitment and retention of under-represented students pursuing careers in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) at The University of Akron. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate The University of Akron?s operation of the special High School Upward Bound, Upward Bound Math Science, Educational Talent Search and Pre-Engineering Academic Achievement Programs with the primary objective of increasing the number of under-represented students in STEM. The programs are offered in collaboration with the College of Engineering Minority Engineering program, Increasing Diversity in Engineering Academics (IDEAs). The net effectiveness of the programs was measured using the following parameters: (a) average high school grade point average both before and after participating in Pre-Engineering programs, (b) high school math and science achievements, (c) retention rate for students returning from previous year, (d) students enrolling in colleges and (e) percentage of students committed to STEM upon graduation. The most noteworthy result stemming from the use of these strategies is that the targeted students, who have expressed an enthusiastic interest in pursuing mathematics and science, are highly motivated, ambitious and excited about exploring STEM.

[1]  William Glasser,et al.  Schools Without Failure , 1968 .

[2]  Kenneth Dunn,et al.  Practical approaches to individualizing instruction;: Contracts and other effective teaching strategies , 1972 .

[3]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[4]  Rita Dunn,et al.  What Does the Research on Learning Styles Have to do with Mario , 1985 .

[5]  J. W. Keefe.  Learning Style Profile. , 1986 .

[6]  Richard R. Hake.  Promoting student crossover to the Newtonian world , 1987 .

[7]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[8]  Gerald M. Phillips,et al.  Teaching group discussion via computer‐mediated communication , 1989 .

[9]  R. Dunn.  UNDERSTANDING THE DUNN AND DUNN LEARNING STYLES MODEL AND THE NEED FOR INDIVIDUAL DIAGNOSIS AND PRESCRIPTION , 1990 .

[10]  T. C. Bello.  COMPARISON OF ELEVEN MAJOR LEARNING STYLES MODELS: VARIABLES, APPROPRIATE POPULATIONS, VALIDITY OF INSTRUMENTATION, AND THE RESEARCH BEHIND THEM , 1990 .

[11]  J. Perrin,et al.  The Learning Styles Project for Potential Dropouts. , 1990 .

[12]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching , 1990 .

[13]  Lorin W. Anderson,et al.  Synthesis of Research on Compensatory and Remedial Education. , 1990 .

[14]  Rita Dunn,et al.  Effects of Matching and Mismatching Minority Developmental College Students' Hemispheric Preferences on Mathematics Scores. , 1990 .

[15]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Thinking Styles: Keys to Understanding Student Performance. , 1990 .

[16]  Lars G. Bjork,et al.  Minorities in Higher Education , 1994 .

[17]  Richard R. Hake,et al.  Socratic pedagogy in the introductory physics laboratory , 1992 .

[18]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[19]  John N. Harb,et al.  Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering Education , 1993 .

[20]  H. Patricia Spencer,et al.  The effects of computerized instruction on the improvement and transfer of writing skills for low-skilled and below-average-skilled sophomore students, considering student gender, ethnicity, and learning style preferences , 1993 .

[21]  J. Levin,et al.  Methodological Problems in Research on Academic Retention Programs for At-Risk Minority College Students. , 1993 .

[22]  Chet Meyers,et al.  Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom , 1993 .

[23]  Barbara Nelson,et al.  Effects of Learning Style Intervention on College Students' Retention and Achievement. , 1993 .

[24]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. , 1994 .

[25]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Learning style based innovations to improve retention of female engineering students in the Synthesis Coalition , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.

[26]  Raymond B. Landis,et al.  Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career , 1995 .

[27]  Douglas Hermond,et al.  Measuring the Retention Strategies of a Minority Engineering Program: A Service Quality Perspective , 1995 .

[28]  Jeffery E. Olson,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Validation of the Dunn and Dunn Model of Learning-Style Preferences , 1995 .

[29]  Paul C. Lam,et al.  Increasing Diversity in Engineering Academics (IDEAs): Development of a Program for Improving African American Representation , 1997, Journal of Career Development.

[30]  J. E. Sharp,et al.  Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn in Engineering Classes , 1997 .

[31]  S.E. Irvine,et al.  Assessment of student understanding using on-line discussion groups , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[32]  Teresa L. Hein,et al.  Technology As A Teaching And Learning Tool: Assessing Student Understanding In The Introductory Physics Lab , 1999 .

[33]  S.E. Irvine,et al.  Different degrees of distance: the impart of the technology-based instructional environment on student learning , 1999, FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011.

[34]  Teresa L Hein.  Using writing to confront student misconceptions in physics , 1999 .

[35]  Donald E. Hanna.  Higher Education in an Era of Digital Competition: Choices and Challenges. , 2000 .

[36]  Donald E. Hanna,et al.  147 Practical Tips for Teaching Online Groups: Essentials of Web-Based Education , 2000 .

[37]  Dean Zollman,et al.  Digital Video, Learning Styles, and Student Understanding of Kinematics Graphs , 2000 .

[38]  LEARNING STYLE IN THE CLASSROOM: A RESEARCH-GUIDED APPROACH , 2003 .

[39]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  MATTERS OF STYLE , 2004 .

[40]  Randall Dewey Knight,et al.  Five Easy Lessons: Strategies for Successful Physics Teaching , 2004 .

[41]  Phillip C Wankat,et al.  Improving Engineering and Technology Education by Applying What is Known About How People Learn , 2005 .