Spatial and species compositional networks for inferring connectivity patterns in ecological communities

Aim Multiple spatial and non-spatial processes are involved in determining the complex patterns underlying the spatial variation of individual species and their assemblages. This complexity, and the logistical challenges involved in following dispersal for multiple species across multiple sites, make it challenging to infer the processes underlying metacommunity spatial heterogeneity. The goal of our paper is to present a robust quantitative framework for inferring spatial patterns across multiple ecological communities. Innovation Unlike numerous metapopulation studies that have inferred migration rates based on landscape connectivity metrics which take into account the spatial positioning of occupied and empty patches, metacommunity studies have relied on spatial predictors built without considering such information. Here, we introduce a novel method called the multi-species spatial network (MSSN) to detect and explain spatial variability in community assemblies using a graph-theoretical approach. The MSSN approach can be best described as a reconciliation between the spatial positioning of sites and their patterns of patch occupation. Main conclusions Our simulation and real data analyses showed that our MSSN approach was better at detecting spatial patterns within metacommunities than the commonly used MEM method (Moran's eigenvector maps). In addition, our proposed framework is also useful in estimating the levels of spatial connectivity for each local community. Finally, our framework is flexible enough to incorporate different types of functions, metrics and algorithms to detect complex spatial patterns.

[1]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[2]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Estimating and controlling for spatial structure in the study of ecological communities , 2010 .

[3]  Vladimir Makarenkov,et al.  Using directed phylogenetic networks to retrace species dispersal history. , 2012, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[4]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[5]  J. Foltête,et al.  Integrating graph-based connectivity metrics into species distribution models , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  Pedro Peres-Neto,et al.  Metacommunity phylogenetics: separating the roles of environmental filters and historical biogeography. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[7]  I. Hanski A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[8]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[9]  Christopher P. Brooks,et al.  Quantifying population substructure: extending the graph-theoretic approach. , 2006, Ecology.

[10]  Katrin M. Meyer,et al.  Multi-proxy evidence for competition between savanna woody species , 2008 .

[11]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Why Neighbor-Joining Works , 2006, Algorithmica.

[12]  Wim Vyverman,et al.  The power of species sorting: Local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  P. Legendre,et al.  Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. , 2006, Ecology.

[14]  P. Legendre,et al.  ANALYZING BETA DIVERSITY: PARTITIONING THE SPATIAL VARIATION OF COMMUNITY COMPOSITION DATA , 2005 .

[15]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .

[16]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  Daniel A Griffith,et al.  Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses. , 2006, Ecology.

[18]  Jason B. Dunham,et al.  METAPOPULATION STRUCTURE OF BULL TROUT: INFLUENCES OF PHYSICAL, BIOTIC, AND GEOMETRICAL LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS , 1999 .

[19]  Jon Norberg,et al.  A Network Approach for Analyzing Spatially Structured Populations in Fragmented Landscape , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  Stéphane Dray,et al.  Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM) , 2006 .

[21]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[22]  Roger Bivand,et al.  Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis , 2012 .

[23]  Jean-Pierre Gabriel,et al.  Complexity in quantitative food webs. , 2009, Ecology.

[24]  Szilard Nemes,et al.  Using connectivity metrics and niche modelling to explore the occurrence of the northern crested newt Triturus cristatus (Amphibia, Caudata) in a traditionally managed landscape , 2010, Environmental Conservation.

[25]  Pedro R Peres-Neto,et al.  A community of metacommunities: exploring patterns in species distributions across large geographical areas. , 2013, Ecology.

[26]  L. Prugh,et al.  An evaluation of patch connectivity measures. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  Timothy H Keitt,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity Explain Disease Dynamics in a Spatially Explicit Network Model , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Assessing the importance of individual habitat patches as irreplaceable connecting elements: An analysis of simulated and real landscape data , 2012 .

[29]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  Carabids (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a forest patchwork: a connectivity analysis of the Bereg Plain landscape graph , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  P. Peres‐Neto,et al.  The role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring lake communities from bacteria to fish. , 2006, Ecology.

[31]  Pedro R. Peres-Neto,et al.  Quantifying and disentangling dispersal in metacommunities: how close have we come? How far is there to go? , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities , 2005 .

[33]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS: MODELS AND ESTIMATION PROCEDURES , 1967, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Defining and measuring trophic role similarity in food webs using regular equivalence. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  Darren J. Bender,et al.  Using patch isolation metrics to predict animal movement in binary landscapes , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Stéphane Dray,et al.  A New Perspective about Moran's Coefficient: Spatial Autocorrelation as a Linear Regression Problem. Moran系数的新视角:空间自相关视为线性回归问题 , 2011 .

[37]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Local processes and regional patterns : appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals , 1999 .

[38]  D. Mason,et al.  Compartments revealed in food-web structure , 2003, Nature.

[39]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory , 2000 .