Accuracy of Indirect ELISA Prepared from Recombinant Bp26 Gene of Brucella melitensis in Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis

Background: Considering the prevalence of brucellosis in Iran, it is necessary to choose a specific and sensitive laboratory method to diagnose it in a rapid and timely manner. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting brucellosis in humans in order to have an appropriate alternative to conventional tests such as Wright, 2ME, and commercial ELISA kits. Materials and Methods: In this study, the recombinant protein produced from the gene (omp28) bp26 Brucella melitensis was used as an antigen for coating microplate wells. A total of 124 serum samples of normal healthy individuals (n=62) and patients with acute brucellosis (n=62) approved by STA and 2 ME tests were entered into the study. The data were analyzed in SPSS (ver.18). Results: The mean age was 39.8±13.5 years in the patient group and 36.1±12.7 years in the healthy group. Furthermore, 66.1% of the patients were male and 62.9% lived in rural regions, while these figures were respectively 71% and 45.2% in the healthy group. The sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 87% and a positive predictive value of 88% and a negative predictive value of 92% and an accuracy of 90% were determined for ELISA kit used in this study. Conclusion: The ELISA diagnostic kit reacted to most of the positive human sera. However, this kit needs to be further evaluated with a larger sample size of clinical specimens from different regions and with various clinical forms of human brucellosis.

[1]  M. Avijgan,et al.  Clinical and serological approach to patients with brucellosis: A common diagnostic dilemma and a worldwide perspective. , 2019, Microbial pathogenesis.

[2]  A. Rafiei,et al.  A review of the immunopathogenesis of Brucellosis , 2019, Infectious diseases.

[3]  P. de Figueiredo,et al.  Pathogenesis and Immunobiology of Brucellosis Review of Brucella e Host Interactions 80 81 , 2015 .

[4]  A. Farazi,et al.  Laboratory features of patients with Brucellosis and its association with titer of Wright agglutination test , 2014 .

[5]  J. Charati,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Elisa Versus Wright in Human Brucellosis with Positive PCR , 2014 .

[6]  H. Basiri,et al.  AMPLIFICATION, CLONING, AND EXPRESSION OF BRUCELLA MELITENSIS BP26 GENE ISOLATED FROM MARKAZI PROVINCE IN ORDER TO PRODUCE BP26 RECOMBINANT PROTEIN , 2013 .

[7]  T. Ica,et al.  Conventional and molecular biotyping of Brucella strains isolated from cattle, sheep and human , 2012 .

[8]  A. Farazi,et al.  Diagnostic validity of the conventional brucellosis serological tests in , 2012 .

[9]  D. Pfeiffer,et al.  Epidemiology and management of a bovine brucellosis cluster in Northern Ireland. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[10]  A. Gangaplara,et al.  Recombinant OMP28 antigen-based indirect ELISA for serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis. , 2010, Molecular and cellular probes.

[11]  Heinrich Neubauer,et al.  Comparison of commercial DNA preparation kits for the detection of Brucellae in tissue using quantitative real-time PCR , 2010, BMC infectious diseases.

[12]  M. Izadi,et al.  DESIGNING AND VALIDATION OF INDIRECT AND COMPETITIVE ELISA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS IN HUMAN , 2009 .

[13]  S. Estein,et al.  Improved Immunogenicity of a Vaccination Regimen Combining a DNA Vaccine Encoding Brucella melitensis Outer Membrane Protein 31 (Omp31) and Recombinant Omp31 Boosting , 2007, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[14]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: a review of test performance and cost comparison. , 2004, Revue scientifique et technique.

[15]  C. A. Fossati,et al.  Antibody Reactivity to Omp31 from Brucella melitensis in Human and Animal Infections by Smooth and Rough Brucellae , 2004, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[16]  J. Paquet,et al.  Major outer membrane proteins of Brucella spp.: past, present and future. , 2002, Veterinary microbiology.