Temporal growth and geographic variation in the use of laboratory tests by NHS general practices: using routine data to identify research priorities.

BACKGROUND Laboratory tests are extensively used for diagnosis and monitoring in UK primary care. Test usage by GPs, and associated costs, have grown substantially in recent years. AIM This study aimed to quantify temporal growth and geographic variation in utilisation of laboratory tests. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective cohort study using data from general practices in the UK. METHOD Data from the General Practice Research Database, including patient demographics, clinical details, and laboratory test results, were used to estimate rates of change in utilisation between 2005 and 2009, and identify tests with greatest inter-regional variation, by fitting random-effects Poisson regression models. The study also investigated indications for test requests, using diagnoses and symptoms recorded in the 2 weeks before each test. RESULTS Around 660 000 tests were recorded in 230 000 person-years of follow-up. Test use increased by 24.2%, from 23 872 to 29 644 tests per 10 000 person-years, between 2005 and 2009. Tests with the largest increases were faecal occult blood (121%) and C-reactive protein (86%). There was substantial geographic variation in test utilisation; GPs in some regions requested tests such as plasma viscosity and cardiac enzymes at a rate more than three times the national average. CONCLUSION Increases in the use of laboratory tests have substantial resource implications. Rapid increases in particular tests may be supported by evidence-based guidelines, but these are often vague about who should be tested, how often, and for how long. Substantial regional variation in test use may reflect uncertainty about diagnostic accuracy and appropriate indications for the laboratory test. There is a need for further research on the diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic impact, and effect on patient health outcomes of the most rapidly increasing and geographically variable tests.

[1]  G. Dinant,et al.  Why do patients want to have their blood tested? A qualitative study of patient expectations in general practice , 2006, BMC family practice.

[2]  Y. V. van Duynhoven,et al.  General practitioner practices in requesting laboratory tests for patients with gastroenteritis in the Netherlands, 2001–2002 , 2006, BMC family practice.

[3]  C. Mcnulty,et al.  Inequalities of primary care microbiology testing between hospital catchment areas , 2003, Journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  D W Simborg,et al.  The failure of physician education as a cost containment strategy. Report of a prospective controlled trial at a university hospital. , 1984, JAMA.

[5]  Johan van der Lei,et al.  Cost consequences of implementing an electronic decision support system for ordering laboratory tests in primary care: evidence from a controlled prospective study in the Netherlands. , 2007, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  Diagnostic and Predictive Value of Acute-phase Reactants in Adult Undifferentiated Peripheral Inflammatory Arthritis: A Systematic Review , 2011, The Journal of Rheumatology. Supplement.

[7]  Julie Bynum,et al.  Regional variations in diagnostic practices. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  C. Mcnulty,et al.  Diagnosis of genital chlamydia in primary care: an explanation of reasons for variation in chlamydia testing , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[9]  P. Rose,et al.  Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. , 2010, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[10]  M. F. Stewart,et al.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10 , 2007, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[11]  M. Crook,et al.  Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last? , 2003, Journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  A. Dhar,et al.  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .

[13]  R. Winkens,et al.  Variation in test ordering behaviour of GPs: professional or context-related factors? , 2004, Family practice.

[14]  David M Studdert,et al.  Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. , 2005, JAMA.

[15]  Anders Larsson,et al.  Long‐term effects of an education programme on the optimal use of clinical chemistry testing in primary health care , 2009, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[16]  S. José,et al.  Standardization: a classic epidemiological method for the comparison of rates. , 2002, Epidemiological bulletin.

[17]  A. Sood,et al.  Non-evidence-based variables affecting physicians' test-ordering tendencies: a systematic review. , 2007, The Netherlands journal of medicine.

[18]  R. Lawrenson,et al.  Clinical information for research; the use of general practice databases. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.

[19]  B. Tennison,et al.  Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection , 2004 .

[20]  T. Reynolds,et al.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 6 , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[21]  M. Vanderpump,et al.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 11 , 2007, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[22]  B. Barnes,et al.  Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. , 1982, Social science & medicine.

[23]  A. Dixon,et al.  The role of GPs in maternity care – what does the future hold? , 2010 .

[24]  T. Avery,et al.  Urinary incontinence management in women: audit in general practice. , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[25]  A. Majeed,et al.  Use of Read codes in diabetes management in a south London primary care group: implications for establishing disease registers , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  J H van Bemmel,et al.  Assessment of Decision Support for Blood Test Ordering in Primary Care , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  Craig Ramsay,et al.  Effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminder messages on laboratory test requesting in primary care: a cluster randomised trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[28]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Improving Test Ordering in Primary Care: The Added Value of a Small-Group Quality Improvement Strategy Compared With Classic Feedback Only , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[29]  C. van Walraven,et al.  Effect of a controlled feedback intervention on laboratory test ordering by community physicians. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[30]  L. Smeeth,et al.  Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review , 2010, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[31]  M. Galloway,et al.  An audit of the indications for the reporting of blood films: results from the National Pathology Benchmarking Study , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[32]  C. Mcnulty,et al.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 12 , 2010, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[33]  T. Dean,et al.  An evaluation of the impact of NICE guidance on GP prescribing. , 2004, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[34]  W S A Smellie,et al.  Is clinical practice variability the major reason for differences in pathology requesting patterns in general practice? , 2002, Journal of clinical pathology.

[35]  L. Smeeth,et al.  How accurate are diagnoses for rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the general practice research database? , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[36]  Varda Shalev,et al.  Format change of a laboratory test order form affects physician behavior , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[37]  A. Larsson,et al.  Costly regional variations in primary health care test utilization in Sweden , 2010, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.