Optimal Quality Strategy and Matching Service on Crowdfunding Platforms

This paper develops a crowdfunding platform model incorporating quality and a matching service from the perspective of a two-sided market. It aims to explore the impact of different factors on the optimal quality threshold and matching service in a context of crowdfunding from the perspective of a two-sided market. We discuss the impact of different factors on the optimal quality threshold and matching service. Two important influential factors are under consideration, simultaneously. One is the quality threshold of admission and the other is the matching efficiency on crowdfunding platforms. This paper develops a two-sided market model incorporating quality, a matching service, and the characters of crowdfunding campaigns. After attempting to solve the model by derivative method, this paper identifies the mechanism of how the parameters influence the optimal quality threshold and matching service. Additionally, it compares the platform profits in scenarios with and without an exclusion policy. The results demonstrate that excluding low-quality projects is profitable when funder preference for project quality is substantial enough. Crowdfunding platform managers would be unwise to admit the quality threshold of the crowdfunding project and charge entrance fees when the parameter of funder preference for project quality is small.

[1]  Haichao Zheng,et al.  The value of information disclosure and lead investor in equity-based crowdfunding: An exploratory empirical study , 2016 .

[2]  A. Roth,et al.  Two-sided matching , 1990 .

[3]  W. Alan Randolph Matching Technology and the Design of Organization Units , 1981 .

[4]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[5]  Yiwen Gao,et al.  Understanding the determinants of funders' investment intentions on crowdfunding platforms: A trust-based perspective , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[6]  Helmuth Cremer,et al.  Competition in Two-Sided Markets with Common Network Externalities , 2009 .

[7]  M. Iansiti,et al.  Entry into Platform-Based Markets , 2012 .

[8]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Crowdfunding and regional entrepreneurial investment: an application of the CrowdBerkeley database , 2017 .

[9]  Ethan Mollick The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study , 2014 .

[10]  Amit V. Deokar,et al.  Detecting Fraudulent Behavior on Crowdfunding Platforms: The Role of Linguistic and Content-Based Cues in Static and Dynamic Contexts , 2016, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Helder Vasconcelos Is exclusionary pricing anticompetitive in two-sided markets? , 2015 .

[12]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Optimal pricing and commitment in two-sided markets ∗ , 2004 .

[13]  J. Meer Effects of the Price of Charitable Giving: Evidence from an Online Crowdfunding Platform , 2013 .

[14]  Markus Reisinger Two-Part Tariff Competition between Two-Sided Platforms , 2014 .

[15]  Javier Cenamor,et al.  Digital strategies for two-sided markets: A case study of shopping malls , 2018, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  S. Bi,et al.  The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding , 2017 .

[17]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[18]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies , 2010 .

[19]  D. Wu,et al.  Regulating platform competition in two-sided markets under the O2O era , 2017, International Journal of Production Economics.

[20]  Huigang Liang,et al.  Understanding the importance of interaction between creators and backers in crowdfunding success , 2018, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[21]  Hanna Halaburda,et al.  Information and Two-Sided Platform Profits , 2014 .

[22]  Capers Jones Software quality - analysis and guidelines for success , 1997 .

[23]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[24]  Andrei Hagiu Two-Sided Platforms: Product Variety and Pricing Structures , 2009 .

[25]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  First-Party Content and Coordination in Two-Sided Markets , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Nicola Maiellaro,et al.  Sustaining Cultural and Natural Heritage in Albania , 2016 .

[27]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Quantity vs. Quality and Exclusion by Two-Sided Platforms , 2009 .

[28]  Masayoshi Maruyama,et al.  Application compatibility and affiliation in two-sided markets , 2015 .

[29]  Xiaowo Tang,et al.  Signaling Product Quality Information in Supply Chains via Corporate Social Responsibility Choices , 2017 .

[30]  Ettore Damiano,et al.  Competing Matchmaking , 2004 .

[31]  Christiaan Hogendorn,et al.  Tipping in two-sided markets with asymmetric platforms , 2016 .

[32]  S. Kraus,et al.  Crowdfunding: The Current State Of Research , 2015 .

[33]  Roberto Roson,et al.  Two-Sided Markets: A Tentative Survey , 2005 .

[34]  Uichin Lee,et al.  Every Little Helps: Understanding Donor Behavior in a Crowdfunding Platform for Non-profits , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[35]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .

[36]  Ohad Barzilay,et al.  Playing Both Sides of the Market: Success and Reciprocity on Crowdfunding Platforms , 2015, ICIS.

[37]  Yuqing Zheng,et al.  Optimal quality threshold of admission in a two-sided farmers’ market , 2012 .

[38]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  The Economics of Crowdfunding Platforms , 2015, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[39]  H. Heinrichs Sharing Economy: A Potential New Pathway to Sustainability , 2013 .

[40]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[41]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[42]  Yuting Chen,et al.  Joint Decisions on Production and Pricing with Strategic Consumers for Green Crowdfunding Products , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[43]  Song-min Kim,et al.  How can we make a socially optimal large-scale media platform? Analysis of a monopolistic Internet media platform using two-sided market theory , 2016 .