Fusion of multimodal three-dimensional data for comprehensive digital documentation of cultural heritage sites

Geometry, appearance and context are essential aspects to capture in the digital documentation of cultural heritage sites. Geometry must be accurate and should provide a level of precision necessary for quantified diagnostics. Visual appearance should capture the “as-is” state, while site specific context is important for correlation, interpretation and analysis. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has established itself as the premier laser scanning modality for the acquisition of trusted geometry, while photogrammetry techniques like structure from motion (SfM) are used to construct visually compelling models. A common challenge of these line-of-sight techniques is that the imaging equipment must be systematically moved throughout the target environment to assure that the data captures the entire target and allows for the removal of occlusions in the final model. By combining terrestrial and airborne imaging techniques using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), also frequently referred to as drones, it is possible to streamline the acquisition of the target data sets. This paper discusses the fusion of full resolution three-dimensional data streams generated from laser scanning, ground based photogrammetry and drone based photogrammetry. Maintaining full resolution of the data sets allows for diagnostic analysis of very subtle deformations and defects like erosion and cracks. In a presented case study in Mexico, terrestrial laser scanning serves as a geometric scaffold that the photogrammetry data is registered to in order to generate a holistic model of a one hectare site containing two historic structures. The laser scanning and photogrammetry data sets have sufficient overlap to enable fusion, and more importantly the individual sets can supplement each other, providing geometry, photorealism and context that the other set lacks.

[1]  Murat Yakar,et al.  Importance of digital close-range photogrammetry in documentation of cultural heritage , 2007 .

[2]  George Pavlidis,et al.  Methods for 3D digitization of Cultural Heritage , 2007 .

[3]  N. Yastikli Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning , 2007 .

[4]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  3D survey and virtual reconstruction of archeological sites , 2014, Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Heritage.

[5]  P. Litkey,et al.  INTEGRATION OF LASER SCANNING AND PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2007 .

[6]  Thomas E. Levy,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning (LiDAR) as a means of digital documentation in rescue archaeology: Two examples from the Faynan of Jordan , 2012, 2012 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia.

[7]  H. Otani,et al.  COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF LASER SCANNING AND PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND THEIR COMBINED USE FOR DIGITAL RECORDING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE , 2004 .

[8]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  A Multi-Resolution Methodology for the 3D Modeling of Large and Complex Archeological Areas , 2009 .

[9]  L. Gonzo,et al.  Digital photogrammetry and laser scanning in cultural heritage survey , 2004 .

[10]  Vid Petrovic,et al.  Visualizing high resolution three-dimensional and two-dimensional data of cultural heritage sites , 2014 .

[11]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[12]  Petros Patias,et al.  Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  Falko Kuester,et al.  Informing Historical Preservation with the Use of Non-destructive Diagnostic Techniques: A Case Study at Ecab, Quintana Roo, Mexico , 2014, EuroMed.

[14]  C. Ruggiero,et al.  An Integrated Methodology for the Digitization, Survey and Visualization of Santa Maria Patirion's Church , 2012 .

[15]  Henrique Lorenzo,et al.  Control of structural problems in cultural heritage monuments using close-range photogrammetry and computer methods , 2005 .

[16]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[17]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[18]  Atsushi Nakazawa,et al.  The great buddha project: modeling cultural heritage for VR systems through observation , 2003, The Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[19]  Giovanna Sansoni,et al.  State-of-The-Art and Applications of 3D Imaging Sensors in Industry, Cultural Heritage, Medicine, and Criminal Investigation , 2009, Sensors.

[20]  M. Ioannides,et al.  Documenting a Unesco Wh Site in Cyprus with Complementary Techniques , 2012 .

[21]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  Photogrammetric Reconstruction of the Great Buddha of Bamiyan, Afghanistan , 2004 .

[22]  A. Acosta,et al.  St. Nicholas of Tolentino monastery and church in Actopan, Hidalgo: preservation, surveying and reuse of a heritage building in Mexico , 2011 .

[23]  Tom Wypych,et al.  Dealing with Archaeology's Data Avalanche , 2011, Computer.