The role of materiality: Knowing through objects in work practice

Abstract Based on the perspective of knowing in practice, this paper investigates the everyday work of engineers in a semiconductor plant. Qualitative data analysis is used to examine the active role of objects and how engineers rely on them to perform troubleshooting in the manufacturing processes. Three active roles emerged from the analysis: (a) objects activating interpretations, (b) objects stimulating collaborative practices, and (c) objects sparking experimental activities. Based on these three findings, we propose that objects have three triggering roles. First, objects trigger meaning-making. The meaning-making process provides a condition for better understanding the situation, making inferences, and developing possible diagnostic logics. Second, objects trigger spontaneous relationships. This role promotes social interaction, encourages members to cooperate, and to negotiate in the organization. Third, objects trigger real-time exploratory actions. These triggering roles of objects enable prioritization and execution of troubleshooting practice, based on the available information, actionable knowledge, and the situation at hand. Finally, these findings have important theoretical implications and indicate interesting future research directions related to the active role of objects in work practice.

[1]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[2]  Ali Yakhlef.  The three facets of knowledge: A critique of the practice-based learning theory , 2010 .

[3]  Oswald Jones,et al.  Object-mediated Learning and Strategic Renewal in a Mature Organization , 2008 .

[4]  Paul Duguid.  The Art of Knowing , 2012 .

[5]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[6]  Charles Heckscher,et al.  Perspective - Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative Community , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[8]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Understanding Shifting Power Relations within and Across Organizations: A Critical Genre Analysis , 2008 .

[10]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[11]  S. Gherardi.  From Organizational Learning to Practice-Based Knowing , 2001 .

[12]  Mark L. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  Understanding Work and Knowledge Management from a Knowledge-in-Practice Perspective , 2013 .

[13]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development , 2012, MIS Q..

[14]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[15]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  Explaining Compassion Organizing , 2006 .

[16]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  W. Orlikowski.  The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[18]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  Knowing What You Don't Know? Discourses and Contradictions in Knowledge Management Research , 2004 .

[20]  Sue Newell,et al.  Understanding Project Survival in an ES Environment: A Sociomaterial Practice Perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[22]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[23]  M. Agar.  The professional stranger : an informal introduction to ethnography , 1981 .

[24]  Beth A. Bechky.  Object Lessons: Workplace Artifacts as Representations of Occupational Jurisdiction1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Engaging Boundary Objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the Subtleties of Layered Engagement , 2009 .

[26]  Carsten S. Østerlund.  Genre Combinations: A Window into Dynamic Communication Practices , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[28]  S. Barley.  Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies , 1996 .

[29]  L. Argote.  Organizational learning research: Past, present and future , 2011 .

[30]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[31]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[32]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[33]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[35]  Alice Lam.  Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures , 1997 .

[36]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[37]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work , 2010 .

[38]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[40]  Suzanne Benn,et al.  Learning and Change for Sustainability Reconsidered: A Role for Boundary Objects , 2010 .

[41]  H. Tsoukas.  The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[42]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[43]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[44]  Paul Duguid,et al.  “The Art of Knowing”: Social and Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and the Limits of the Community of Practice , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[45]  Ching-Fang Lee,et al.  The Problems of Embeddedness: Knowledge Transfer, Coordination and Reuse in Information Systems , 2006 .

[46]  S. Gherardi.  Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations , 2000 .

[47]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[48]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[49]  D. Wellman,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[50]  A. Amin,et al.  Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice , 2008 .

[51]  Erica L. Wagner,et al.  Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[52]  Hille C. Bruns,et al.  Working Alone Together: Coordination in Collaboration across Domains of Expertise , 2013 .

[53]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[54]  Davide Nicolini.  Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections , 2009 .

[55]  Andrew B. Hargadon.  Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[56]  Heiko Gebauer,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation , 2012 .

[57]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Material artifacts:practices for doing strategy with 'stuff' , 2013 .

[58]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies , 2008 .

[59]  Eugenia Cacciatori,et al.  Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms , 2008 .

[60]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[61]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[62]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[63]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Learning In a Constellation of Interconnected Practices: Canon or Dissonance? , 2002 .

[64]  Greta Hsu.  Jacks of All Trades and Masters of None: Audiences' Reactions to Spanning Genres in Feature Film Production , 2006 .

[65]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne , 2001, MIS Q..

[66]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Boundary Objects with Agency: A Method for Studying the Design–Use Interface , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[67]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Stretching out and expanding work practices in time and space: The case of telemedicine , 2007 .

[68]  Charles Heckscher,et al.  Professional Work : The Emergence of Collaborative Community , 2008 .

[69]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[70]  Jacky Swan,et al.  The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation , 2007 .

[71]  Davide Nicolini.  Medical Innovation as a Process of Translation: A Case from the Field of Telemedicine , 2010 .

[72]  M. Miles,et al.  Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft , 1984 .

[73]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[74]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[75]  Beth A. Bechky.  Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[76]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[77]  Oswald Jones,et al.  Making sense of mediated learning: Cases from small firms , 2010 .

[78]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..

[79]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[80]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[82]  S. Massa,et al.  A knowledge management approach to organizational competitive advantage: Evidence from the food sector , 2009 .

[83]  E. Goldman,et al.  Enhancing the ability to think strategically: A learning model , 2010 .

[84]  R. Friedman,et al.  Differentiation of Boundary Spanning Roles: Labor Negotiations and Implications for Role Conflict , 1992 .

[85]  G. Lakomski.  On Knowing in Context , 2004 .

[86]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[87]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[88]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Commentary on Wanda Orlikowski's ‘Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability’ , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Ruey‐Lin Hsiao,et al.  Collaborative Knowing: The Adaptive Nature of Cross‐Boundary Spanning , 2012 .

[90]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[91]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..