Addressing Levels Issues in IS Qualitative Research

In this study, we investigate levels of analysis employed in IS qualitative research. Five years of IS literature reviewed yields patterns across research activities supporting the multilevel nature of IS research settings. While level issues have been discussed in the context of quantitative research, this study specifically addresses the previously unexplored area of qualitative IS research. We put forth that qualitative research is also susceptible to issues regarding level specification. We illustrate the multilevel nature of IS qualitative research. We specifically highlight the analysis level conformity of research activities with the inferences of the research. We urge researchers to be sensitive to level-related issues in order to produce more rigorous IS qualitative research.

[1]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Multiple Levels of Analysis From a Longitudinal Perspective: Some Implications for Theory Building , 1999 .

[2]  William L. Hays,et al.  Theory Testing in Organizational Behavior: The Varient Approach. , 1985 .

[3]  Anol Bhattacherjee.  Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices , 2012 .

[4]  J. Popay,et al.  Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research , 1998, Qualitative health research.

[5]  Shelley D. Dionne,et al.  DIVERSITY AND DEMOGRAPHY IN ORGANIZATIONS: A LEVELS OF ANALYSIS REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 2005 .

[6]  D. Polkinghorne.  Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis , 1995 .

[7]  Susan Spiggle.  Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research , 1994 .

[8]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[9]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  LEVEL SPECIFICATION: USING TRIANGULATION IN A GROUNDED THEORY APPROACH TO CONSTRUCT VALIDATION , 2003 .

[10]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[11]  Walter Fernandez,et al.  Qualitative methods in information systems research , 2012 .

[12]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[13]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  A framework for analyzing levels of analysis issues in studies of e-collaboration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[14]  Katia Puente-Palacios,et al.  Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions , 2003 .

[15]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[16]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .

[17]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[18]  Cecil Eng Huang Chua,et al.  The Role of Online Trading Communities in Managing Internet Auction Fraud , 2007, MIS Q..

[19]  Kathryn M. Borman,et al.  Ethnographic and Qualitative Research Design and Why It Doesn't Work , 1986 .

[20]  S. Barley.  The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[21]  D. Rousseau.  Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. , 1985 .

[22]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[23]  Ana V. Diez Roux.  Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. , 1998 .

[24]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  F. Yammarino,et al.  Overview: The many faces of multi-level issues , 2002 .

[26]  F. Lau,et al.  A review on the use of action research in information systems studies , 1997 .

[27]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[28]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.