Towards defect monitoring for metallic additive manufacturing components using phased array ultrasonic testing

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a rising technology bringing new opportunities for design and cost of manufacturing, compared to standard processes like casting and machining. Among the AM techniques, direct energy deposition (DED) processes are dedicated to manufacture functional metallic parts. Despite of their promising perspectives, the industrial implementation of DED processes is inhibited by the lack of structural health control. Consequently, non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques can be investigated to inspect DED-manufactured parts, in an online or offline manner. To date, most ultrasonic NDT applications to metallic AM concerned the selective laser melting process; existing studies tackling DED processes mainly compare various ultrasonic techniques and do not propose a comprehensive control method for such processes. Current researches in the GeM laboratory focus on a multi-sensor monitoring method dedicated to DED processes, with a structural health control loop included, in order to track defect formation during manufacturing. In this way, this paper aims to be a proof of concept and proposes a comprehensive control method that opens the way to in situ ultrasonic control for DED. In this paper, a control method using the phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) technique is particularly illustrated on wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) components, and its applicability to laser metal deposition (LMD) is also demonstrated. A specific attention is given to the calibration method, towards a quantitative prediction of the size of the detected flaws. PAUT predictions are cross-checked thanks to X-ray radiography, which demonstrates that the PAUT method enables to detect and dimension defects from 0.6 to 1 mm for WAAM aluminum alloy parts. Then, an applicable scenario of inspection of a WAAM industrial and large-scale part is presented. Finally, perspectives for in situ and real-time application of the chosen method are given. This paper shows that real-time monitoring of the WAAM process is possible, as the PAUT method can be integrated in the manufacturing environment, provides relevant in situ data, and runs with computing times compatible with real-time applications.

[1]  Zheng Fan,et al.  Sizing of flaws using ultrasonic bulk wave testing: A review. , 2018, Ultrasonics.

[2]  P. Wilcox,et al.  Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit-receive array data for non-destructive evaluation , 2005 .

[3]  M. Fink,et al.  Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Pei Wei,et al.  Thermal behavior in single track during selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg powder , 2017 .

[5]  F. A. Silber,et al.  ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS , 1978 .

[6]  J. Hascoët,et al.  Modeling and control of a direct laser powder deposition process for Functionally Graded Materials (FGM) parts manufacturing , 2013 .

[7]  José Pedro Sousa,et al.  Non-destructive testing application of radiography and ultrasound for wire and arc additive manufacturing , 2018 .

[8]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[9]  Alexander Dillhöfer,et al.  Ultrasonic online monitoring of additive manufacturing processes based on selective laser melting , 2015 .

[10]  N. Knezovic,et al.  In-process non-destructive ultrasonic testing application during wire plus arc additive manufacturing , 2018, Advances in Production Engineering & Management.

[11]  A. Addison,et al.  Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing , 2016 .

[12]  Guanqun Yu,et al.  Porosity evolution and its thermodynamic mechanism of randomly packed powder-bed during selective laser melting of Inconel 718 alloy , 2017 .

[13]  Ohyung Kwon,et al.  A deep neural network for classification of melt-pool images in metal additive manufacturing , 2018, J. Intell. Manuf..

[14]  Akhil Garg,et al.  Evaluation of genetic programming-based models for simulating bead dimensions in wire and arc additive manufacturing , 2019, J. Intell. Manuf..

[15]  Stephen Pierce,et al.  Ultrasonic Phased Array Inspection of Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture Samples Using Conventional and Total Focusing Method Imaging Approaches , 2019, Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring.

[16]  F. Chinesta,et al.  Online Prediction of Machining Distortion of Aeronautical Parts Caused by Re-Equilibration of Residual Stresses , 2014 .

[17]  Volker Carl,et al.  Monitoring system for the quality assessment in additive manufacturing , 2015 .

[18]  Matthieu Rauch,et al.  Towards a multi-sensor monitoring methodology for AM metallic processes , 2019, Welding in the World.

[19]  Satoru Asai,et al.  Numerical simulation of WAAM process by a GMAW weld pool model , 2018, Welding in the World.

[20]  Hamid Garmestani,et al.  Analytical Modeling of In-Process Temperature in Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing Considering Laser Power Absorption, Latent Heat, Scanning Strategy, and Powder Packing , 2019, Materials.

[21]  P. Dumas,et al.  Adaptive ultrasonic imaging with the total focusing method for inspection of complex components immersed in water , 2015 .

[22]  L. Quintino,et al.  MAPPING OF NON-DESTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUES FOR INSPECTION OF WIRE AND ARC ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING , 2017 .