Current state of diagnostic technologies in the autoimmunology laboratory

Abstract The methods for detecting and measuring autoantibodies have evolved markedly in recent years, encompassing three generations of analytical technologies. Many different immunoassay methods have been developed and used for research and laboratory practice purposes, from the early conventional (or monoplex) analytical methods able to detect single autoantibodies to the more recent multiplex platforms that can quantify tens of molecules. Although it has been in use for over 50 years, indirect immunofluorescence remains the standard method for research on many types of autoantibodies, due to its characteristics of diagnostic sensitivity and also to recent technological innovations which permit it a greater level of automation and standardization. The recent multiplex immunometric methods, with varying levels of automation, present characteristics of higher diagnostic accuracy, but are not yet widely diffused in autoimmunology laboratories due to the limited number of autoantibodies that are detectable, and due to the high cost of reagents and systems. Technological advancement in autoimmunology continues to evolve rapidly, and in the coming years new proteomic techniques will be able to radically change the approach to diagnostics and possibly also clinical treatment of autoimmune diseases. The scope of this review is to update the state of the art of technologies and methods for the measurement of autoantibodies, with special reference to innovations in indirect immunofluorescence and in multiple proteomic methods.

[1]  René Westhovens,et al.  Antinuclear antibody detection by automated multiplex immunoassay in untreated patients at the time of diagnosis. , 2012, Autoimmunity reviews.

[2]  Y. Shoenfeld,et al.  The Homogeneous Multiplexed System-a New Method for Autoantibody Profile in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus , 2005, Clinical & developmental immunology.

[3]  Nicola Bizzaro,et al.  Are we at a stage to predict autoimmune rheumatic diseases? , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  Anne-Marie Rouquette,et al.  Evaluation of the new multiplexed immunoassay, FIDIS, for simultaneous quantitative determination of antinuclear antibodies and comparison with conventional methods. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  P. Brown,et al.  Autoantigen microarrays for multiplex characterization of autoantibody responses , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[6]  A. Wiik,et al.  Clinical optimization and multicenter validation of antigen-specific cut-off values on the INNO-LIAr ANA Update for the detection of autoantibodies in connective tissue disorders , 2002, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[7]  M. Hart,et al.  Can an ELISA replace immunofluorescence for the detection of anti-nuclear antibodies?--The routine use of anti-nuclear antibody screening ELISAs. , 2007, Clinical laboratory.

[8]  R J Falk,et al.  International Consensus Statement on Testing and Reporting of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA) , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  H G KUNKEL,et al.  Complement Fixation with Cell Nuclei and DNA in Lupus Erythematosus , 1957, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[10]  Nicola Bizzaro,et al.  Infectious Serologies and Autoantibodies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  N. Rothfield,et al.  Clinical significance of antinuclear antibodies. , 1967, Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia.

[12]  Nicola Bizzaro,et al.  NOVEL DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR AUTOANTIBODY DETECTION , 2007 .

[13]  O. Rekvig,et al.  Screening tests for antinuclear antibodies (ANA): selective use of central nuclear antigens as a rational basis for screening by ELISA. , 1999, Journal of autoimmunity.

[14]  Ravi Kaul,et al.  Performance of the BioPlex 2200 Autoimmune Vasculitis kit. , 2009, Autoimmunity reviews.

[15]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  A comparative study on the reliability of an automated system for the evaluation of cell-based indirect immunofluorescence. , 2012, Autoimmunity reviews.

[16]  Y. Shoenfeld,et al.  Infections and autoimmune thyroid diseases: parallel detection of antibodies against pathogens with proteomic technology. , 2008, Autoimmunity reviews.

[17]  Marielle Sanmarco,et al.  BioPlex™ 2200 multiplexed system: Simultaneous detection of anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus , 2009, Autoimmunity.

[18]  Nicola Bizzaro,et al.  Autoantibody profiling of patients with autoimmune thyroid disease using a new multiplexed immunoassay method , 2006, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[19]  S. Albon,et al.  Performance of a multiplex assay compared to enzyme and precipitation methods for anti-ENA testing in systemic lupus and systemic sclerosis. , 2011, Journal of immunological methods.

[20]  Göran Hallmans,et al.  Autoantibodies predate the onset of systemic lupus erythematosus in northern Sweden , 2011, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[21]  F J López-Longo,et al.  Simultaneous identification of various antinuclear antibodies using an automated multiparameter line immunoassay system , 2003, Lupus.

[22]  D Gianola,et al.  Multicenter validation of recombinant, natural and synthetic antigens used in a single multiparameter assay for the detection of specific anti-nuclear autoantibodies in connective tissue disorders. , 1999, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[23]  A. León,et al.  Efficiency of different strategies to detect autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens. , 2010 .

[24]  Lawrence Steinman,et al.  Proteomics technologies for the study of autoimmune disease. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[25]  Marcos López-Hoyos,et al.  Performance of Antinuclear Antibody Connective Tissue Disease Screen , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  W Emlen,et al.  Clinical significance of antinuclear antibodies: comparison of detection with immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  George Notas,et al.  Comparison of a multiplex, bead-based fluorescent assay and immunofluorescence methods for the detection of ANA and ANCA autoantibodies in human serum. , 2006, Journal of immunological methods.

[28]  Giulio Iannello,et al.  Novel opportunities in automated classification of antinuclear antibodies on HEp-2 cells. , 2011, Autoimmunity reviews.

[29]  Torben Lund,et al.  Screening autoantibody profiles in systemic rheumatic disease with a diagnostic protein microarray that uses a filtration-assisted nanodot array luminometric immunoassay (NALIA). , 2008, Clinical chemistry.

[30]  George G Klee,et al.  Antibody-based protein multiplex platforms: technical and operational challenges. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[31]  D. Stites,et al.  Comparison of antinuclear antibody testing methods: immunofluorescence assay versus enzyme immunoassay , 1997, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology.

[32]  Nicola Bizzaro,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Elisa Methods as an Alternative Screening Test to Indirect Immunofluorescence for the Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies. Evaluation of Five Commercial Kits , 2004, Autoimmunity.

[33]  Concepción González,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a microsphere bead-based flow cytometry assay for the simultaneous determination of anti-thyroid peroxidase and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies. , 2005, Clinical biochemistry.

[34]  H. Hill,et al.  Comparison of Three Multiplex Immunoassays for Detection of Antibodies to Extractable Nuclear Antibodies Using Clinically Defined Sera , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  A. Schindler,et al.  Acid hydrolysis of urinary estriol. , 1967, Clinical chemistry.

[36]  Allan Wiik,et al.  Detection of antinuclear antibodies by solid-phase immunoassays and immunofluorescence analysis. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[37]  Nicola Bizzaro,et al.  The clinical autoimmunologist and the laboratory autoimmunologist: the two sides of the coin. , 2012, Autoimmunity reviews.

[38]  F. Celada,et al.  A DNA-Reacting Factor in Serum of a Patient with Lupus Erythematosus Diffusus.∗ , 1957, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[39]  Antonella Afeltra,et al.  Screening of antinuclear antibodies: comparison between enzyme immunoassay based on nuclear homogenates, purified or recombinant antigens and immunofluorescence assay , 2004, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[40]  G. Jacob,et al.  Detection of antinuclear antibodies: comparative evaluation of enzyme immunoassay and indirect immunofluorescence methods. , 1998, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[41]  P. Schur,et al.  ANA screening: an old test with new recommendations , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[42]  K. Terplán,et al.  Chronic thyroiditis and autoimmunization. , 1957, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[43]  Maya Ram,et al.  Autoantibody Screen in Inflammatory Myopathies High Prevalence of Antibodies to Gliadin , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Renato Tozzoli,et al.  Recent advances in diagnostic technologies and their impact in autoimmune diseases. , 2007, Autoimmunity reviews.

[45]  Orazio Ruzzenente,et al.  Determination of ANA specificity using multiplexed fluorescent microsphere immunoassay in patients with ANA positivity at high titres after infliximab treatment: preliminary results , 2007, Rheumatology International.

[46]  M. Fritzler,et al.  Improved Serological Differentiation between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Mixed Connective Tissue Disease by Use of an SmD3 Peptide-Based Immunoassay , 2005, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[47]  Giulio Iannello,et al.  Indirect immunofluorescence in autoimmune diseases: Assessment of digital images for diagnostic purpose , 2007, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[48]  Robert F Murphy,et al.  Automated interpretation of subcellular patterns from immunofluorescence microscopy. , 2004, Journal of immunological methods.

[49]  A. Perl,et al.  Immunofluorescence microscopy is superior to fluorescent beads for detection of antinuclear antibody reactivity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. , 2007, Clinical immunology.

[50]  S. Kondo,et al.  Detection of antinuclear antibodies by use of an enzyme immunoassay with nuclear HEp-2 cell extract and recombinant antigens: comparison with immunofluorescence assay in 307 patients. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[51]  F W Chu,et al.  Multianalyte microspot immunoassay--microanalytical "compact disk" of the future. , 1991, Clinical chemistry.

[52]  Erik Avaniss-Aghajani,et al.  Clinical Value of Multiplexed Bead-Based Immunoassays for Detection of Autoantibodies to Nuclear Antigens , 2007, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[53]  M. Sticherling,et al.  Comparison of Different Test Systems for Simultaneous Autoantibody Detection in Connective Tissue Diseases , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[54]  D. Doniach,et al.  Auto-immunity in Hashimoto's disease and its implications. , 1957, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[55]  Nicola Bizzaro,et al.  New Coupled-Particle Light-Scattering Assay for Detection of Ro/SSA (52 and 60 Kilodaltons) and La/SSB Autoantibodies in Connective Tissue Diseases , 2001, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[56]  E. Holborow,et al.  A Serum Factor in Lupus Erythematosus with Affinity for Tissue Nuclei , 1957, British medical journal.

[57]  R. B. Goudie,et al.  Auto-antibodies in Addison's disease. , 1957, Lancet.

[58]  Mark C. Genovese,et al.  Computer-Assisted Pattern Recognition of Autoantibody Results , 2005, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[59]  David L Buckeridge,et al.  Measurement of antinuclear antibodies by multiplex immunoassay: a prospective, multicenter clinical evaluation. , 2007, The Journal of rheumatology.

[60]  Marvin J Fritzler,et al.  The antinuclear antibody test: last or lasting gasp? , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[61]  Rothfield Nf,et al.  Clinical significance of antinuclear antibodies. , 1967, Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia.

[62]  R. B. Dinkelaar,et al.  Different Strategies in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Autoimmune Disease: Immunofluorescence, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay or Both? , 1999, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[63]  Renato Tozzoli,et al.  Multiplexed immunoassay of thyroglobulin autoantibodies in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma , 2012, Head & neck.

[64]  Chandra Mohan,et al.  Proteomic toolbox for autoimmunity research. , 2009, Autoimmunity reviews.

[65]  A. Wiik,et al.  Antinuclear antibodies: a contemporary nomenclature using HEp-2 cells. , 2010, Journal of autoimmunity.

[66]  Y. Shoenfeld,et al.  Multiplexed AtheNA multi-lyte immunoassay for ANA screening in autoimmune diseases , 2005, Autoimmunity.

[67]  Daniel H Solomon,et al.  Evidence-based guidelines for the use of immunologic tests: antinuclear antibody testing. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[68]  M M HARGRAVES,et al.  Presentation of two bone marrow elements; the tart cell and the L.E. cell. , 1948, Proceedings of the staff meetings. Mayo Clinic.

[69]  Nicola Bizzaro,et al.  Geographical Differences in Autoantibodies and Anti-infectious Agents Antibodies Among Healthy Adults , 2011, Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology.

[70]  Y. Shoenfeld,et al.  Evaluation of the BioPlex™ 2200 ANA Screen: Analysis of 510 Healthy Subjects: Incidence of Natural/Predictive Autoantibodies , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[71]  J E Fonseca,et al.  Multiplexed Immunoassay for Detection of Rheumatoid Factors by FIDIS™ Technology , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[72]  P. Ghillani,et al.  Evaluation of the LIAISON ANA Screen Assay for Antinuclear Antibody Testing in Autoimmune Diseases , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[73]  R. Murphy,et al.  Automated subcellular location determination and high-throughput microscopy. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[74]  Kara Thompson,et al.  Measurement of autoantibodies using multiplex methodology in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. , 2010, Journal of immunological methods.

[75]  I. Salamunić,et al.  Comparative analysis of multiplex AtheNA Multi-Lyte ANA test system and conventional laboratory methods to detect autoantibodies , 2008 .

[76]  Rico Hiemann,et al.  Automated evaluation of autoantibodies on human epithelial-2 cells as an approach to standardize cell-based immunofluorescence tests , 2010, Arthritis research & therapy.

[77]  José M González-Buitrago,et al.  Laboratory screening of connective tissue diseases by a new automated ENA screening assay (EliA Symphony) in clinically defined patients. , 2005, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[78]  Bonnie Bruce,et al.  Antigen microarray profiling of autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[79]  Elias Zintzaras,et al.  Evaluation of a Microsphere‐Based Flow Cytometric Assay for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease , 2004, Journal of immunoassay & immunochemistry.

[80]  Harry R. Hill,et al.  Evaluation of Multiplexed Fluorescent Microsphere Immunoassay for Detection of Autoantibodies to Nuclear Antigens , 2004, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[81]  Marvin J Fritzler,et al.  Analysis of human sera that are polyreactive in an addressable laser bead immunoassay. , 2006, Clinical immunology.

[82]  E. Ulvestad,et al.  Performance characteristics and clinical utility of a hybrid ELISA for detection of ANA Note , 2001, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[83]  F. Borek Book reviewEssentials of clinical immunology: Chapel, H. and M. Haeney, 440 pp., illus. Blackwell, Oxford, 1984. Soft cover £8.50, ISBN 0-632-01236-6 , 1986 .

[84]  Renato Tozzoli,et al.  The diagnostic role of autoantibodies in the prediction of organ-specific autoimmune diseases , 2008, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[85]  L. Andrade,et al.  Pattern on the antinuclear antibody-HEp-2 test is a critical parameter for discriminating antinuclear antibody-positive healthy individuals and patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[86]  R J Fulton,et al.  Advanced multiplexed analysis with the FlowMetrix system. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[87]  S. Lorenzini,et al.  Altered thiol pattern in plasma of subjects affected by rheumatoid arthritis. , 2005, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[88]  Dirk Roggenbuck,et al.  A novel automated indirect immunofluorescence autoantibody evaluation , 2012, Clinical Rheumatology.

[89]  P. van Paassen,et al.  Evaluation of the FIDIS Vasculitis Multiplex Immunoassay for Diagnosis and Follow‐up of ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis and Goodpasture's Disease , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[90]  R. B. Goudie,et al.  AUTOANTIBODIES IN ADDISON'S DISEASE , 1966 .

[91]  Marco Pradella,et al.  Guidelines for the laboratory use of autoantibody tests in the diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. , 2002, American journal of clinical pathology.

[92]  M J Fritzler,et al.  Advances and Applications of Multiplexed Diagnostic Technologies in Autoimmune Diseases , 2006, Lupus.

[93]  Rico Hiemann,et al.  Challenges of automated screening and differentiation of non-organ specific autoantibodies on HEp-2 cells. , 2009, Autoimmunity reviews.

[94]  W. Trotter,et al.  Precipitating and complement-fixing antibodies in Hashimoto's disease. , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[95]  Hyon-Suk Kim,et al.  Comparison of automated multiplexed bead-based ANA screening assay with ELISA for detecting five common anti-extractable nuclear antigens and anti-dsDNA in systemic rheumatic diseases. , 2012, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[96]  Vern Farewell,et al.  Comparison between multiplex assays for autoantibody detection in systemic lupus erythematosus. , 2010, Journal of immunological methods.

[97]  Andrea Giordano,et al.  Autoantibodies Profile in the Sera of Patients with Sjogren]s Syndrome: The ANA Evaluation—A Homogeneous, Multiplexed System , 2004, Clinical & developmental immunology.

[98]  Marielle Sanmarco,et al.  Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen for the Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies and Comparison with Conventional Methods , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[99]  T. Jaskowski,et al.  Screening for antinuclear antibodies by enzyme immunoassay. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.

[100]  Raymond E Biagini,et al.  Analytical performance of the AtheNA MultiLyte® ANA II assay in sera from lupus patients with multiple positive ANAs , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.