Delay Asymptotics With Retransmissions and Incremental Redundancy Codes Over Erasure Channels

Recent studies have shown that retransmissions can cause heavy-tailed transmission delays even when packet sizes are light tailed. In addition, the impact of heavy-tailed delays persists even when packets size are upper bounded. The key question we study in this paper is how the use of coding techniques to transmit information, together with different system configurations, would affect the distribution of delay. To investigate this problem, we model the underlying channel as a Markov modulated binary erasure channel, where transmitted bits are either received successfully or erased. Erasure codes are used to encode information prior to transmission, which ensures that a fixed fraction of the bits in the codeword can lead to successful decoding. We use incremental redundancy codes, where the codeword is divided into codeword trunks and these trunks are transmitted one at a time to provide incremental redundancies to the receiver until the information is recovered. We characterize the distribution of delay under two different scenarios: 1) decoder uses memory to cache all previously successfully received bits and 2) decoder does not use memory, where received bits are discarded if the corresponding information cannot be decoded. In both cases, we consider codeword length with infinite and finite support. From a theoretical perspective, our results provide a benchmark to quantify the tradeoff between system complexity and the distribution of delay.

[1]  D. Vere-Jones Markov Chains , 1972, Nature.

[2]  G. David Forney,et al.  Exponential error bounds for erasure, list, and decision feedback schemes , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Predrag R. Jelenkovic,et al.  Can Retransmissions of Superexponential Documents Cause Subexponential Delays? , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[4]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Transition from Heavy to Light Tails in Retransmission Durations , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[5]  Daniel A. Spielman,et al.  Efficient erasure correcting codes , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  Amir Dembo,et al.  Large Deviations Techniques and Applications , 1998 .

[7]  Predrag R. Jelenkovic,et al.  Is ALOHA Causing Power Law Delays? , 2007, International Teletraffic Congress.

[8]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Data networks (2nd ed.) , 1992 .

[9]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Data Networks , 1986 .

[10]  Michael Luby,et al.  LT codes , 2002, The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings..

[11]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Delay asymptotics with retransmissions and fixed rate codes over erasure channels , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.