A probabilistic simplified seismic model of masonry buildings based on ambient vibrations

The paper presents a new simplified mathematical model for predicting the structural seismic response of buildings. The model, denominated Seismic Model from Ambient Vibrations (SMAV), is based on the experimental modal parameters identified from ambient vibration and only a few information about the geometry and the structural typology of the building. After a short review of the Multi Rigid Polygons model, recently illustrated and validated in an other paper by some of the authors, that allows to estimate the seismic participation factors of the experimental modes also for buildings characterized by complex shaped plan and structural irregularity along the height, the attention is focused on a new stochastic approach for modeling the seismic response of masonry buildings. In particular this new approach aims to take into account the non linearity occurred during a seismic event so that the nonlinear behaviour of the building is considered by reducing its modal frequencies according to the response amplitude. The reduction of the natural frequencies, extracted by Operational Modal Analysis from ambient vibrations, is computed according to specific probabilistic curves: the Frequency Shift Curves (FSCs). This curves provide the percentage reduction of the natural frequencies as a function of the maximum roof drift reached during the strong motion and they are obtained, for some specific masonry typologies, through a Monte Carlo analysis carried out using a simple mechanical model of a masonry panel with geometric and mechanical parameters that vary according to their probabilistic distributions. The seismic response of the building is then computed through a linear equivalent analysis in which an iterative algorithm updates the resonant frequencies according to the specific FSC curve. The concept of structural serviceability index (IOPS), expressing the probability of the building to remain operational, is also introduced. Finally, a comparison between the seismic response computed by the model and the experimental seismic response of the Pizzoli town hall, a masonry existing building endowed with a permanent accelerometer monitoring system, is illustrated.

[1]  M. Dolce,et al.  Earthquake Damage Scenarios of the Building Stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) Including Site Effects , 2003 .

[2]  P. B. Shing,et al.  Inelastic Behavior of Concrete Masonry Shear Walls , 1989 .

[3]  Panagiotis Kotronis,et al.  Full‐scale dynamic response of an RC building under weak seismic motions using earthquake recordings, ambient vibrations and modelling , 2007, 0710.1205.

[4]  Guido Magenes,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS , 2006 .

[5]  Guido Magenes,et al.  Test results on the behaviour of masonry under static cyclic in plane lateral loads , 2008 .

[6]  Roberto Villaverde,et al.  Methods to Assess the Seismic Collapse Capacity of Building Structures: State of the Art , 2007 .

[7]  Tie Jun Qu,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Two-Story Brick Masonry Building , 2013 .

[8]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  In-Plane Experimental Behavior of Stone Masonry Walls under Cyclic Loading , 2009 .

[9]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  The Observed Wander of the Natural Frequencies in a Structure , 2006 .

[10]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Operational Modal Analysis of Civil Engineering Structures: An Introduction and Guide for Applications , 2014 .

[11]  Serena Cattari,et al.  TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings , 2013 .

[12]  Daniele Spina,et al.  Structural monitoring by the Italian Department of Civil Protection and the case of 2009 Abruzzo seismic sequence , 2011 .

[13]  S. Lagomarsino,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability of Existing Buildings , 2013 .

[14]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[15]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison , 2012 .

[16]  Rosario Ceravolo,et al.  Amplitude dependence of equivalent modal parameters in monitored buildings during earthquake swarms , 2017 .

[17]  Clotaire Michel,et al.  Dynamic parameters of structures extracted from ambient vibration measurements : An aid for the seismic vulnerability assessment of existing buildings in moderate seismic hazard regions , 2007, 0710.1210.

[18]  W C Grabb,et al.  The experimental method. , 1972, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  Pierino Lestuzzi,et al.  Quantification of fundamental frequency drop for unreinforced masonry buildings from dynamic tests , 2011 .

[20]  Daniele Spina,et al.  Osservatorio sismico delle strutture: the Italian structural seismic monitoring network , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[21]  Daniele Spina,et al.  Modal mass estimation from ambient vibrations measurement: A method for civil buildings , 2018 .

[22]  Miha Tomaževič,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Masonry Walls: Experimental Simulation , 1996 .

[23]  K. J. Ives,et al.  Experimental Methods (2) , 1978 .

[24]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[25]  Clotaire Michel,et al.  Experimental Method: Contribution of Ambient Vibration Recordings to the Vulnerability Assessment , 2013 .

[26]  Maria I. Todorovska,et al.  Seismic Interferometry of a Soil-Structure Interaction Model with Coupled Horizontal and Rocking Response , 2009 .

[27]  Miha Tomazevic,et al.  Earthquake-Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings , 1999 .

[28]  Mehmet Çelebi,et al.  Transient and Long-Term Changes in Seismic Response of the Natural Resources Building, Olympia, Washington, due to Earthquake Shaking , 2012 .

[29]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  In‐plane seismic response of brick masonry walls , 1997 .

[30]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .