Measuring Future Vehicle Preferences

The culmination of new vehicle technology, greater competition in energy markets, and government policies to reduce pollution and energy consumption will result in changes to the personal vehicle marketplace. To measure future vehicle preferences, stated preference (SP) surveys have been the dominant approach. Prior research has been limited to a narrow focus of accelerating respondents' hypothetical next vehicle purchasing decisions without mimicking the influence of the marketplace on these decisions. To explore marketplace influences, this study proposes to use a novel SP survey design to analyze vehicle purchasing behavior in a dynamically changing marketplace through the use of dynamic attributes and a 6-year hypothetical time window. The survey is divided into three parts: household characteristics, current vehicles, and SP. The SP section presents respondents with various hypothetical scenarios annually over a future 6-year period with one of three experiments. The experiments correspond to changing vehicle technology, fueling options, and taxation policy. Between scenarios, the vehicle, fuel, and policy attributes dynamically change to mimic marketplace conditions. A pilot web-based survey was performed during fall 2010. Mixed logit models showed that individuals responded in behaviorally realistic ways and that the survey design allowed for estimation of important parameters in vehicle choice. Respondents were able to depreciate their vehicles over the 5-year hypothetical period and place trade-offs on the features of vehicles and fuel types. The insights from the survey are also used to suggest refinements to the survey methods and areas for further research.

[1]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Early U.S. Market for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2009 .

[2]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles , 2009 .

[3]  Denis Bolduc,et al.  Hybrid Choice Modeling of New Technologies for Car Choice in Canada , 2008 .

[4]  David Gaker,et al.  Experimental Economics in Transportation , 2010 .

[5]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Evolution of the household vehicle fleet: Anticipating fleet composition, PHEV adoption and GHG emissions in Austin, Texas , 2011 .

[6]  Alain L. Kornhauser,et al.  A GAME THEORETIC/NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM SOLUTION APPROACH FOR THE RAILROAD FREIGHT CAR MANAGEMENT PROBLEM , 1993 .

[7]  Jonathan K. Yoder,et al.  Resource and Energy Economics , 2010 .

[8]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Behavioural responses to vehicle emissions charging , 2009 .

[9]  K. Train,et al.  Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns , 1998 .

[10]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[11]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  A forecast of household ownership and use of alternative fuel vehicles: A multiple discrete-continuous choice approach , 2008 .

[12]  Joan L. Walker.  Mixed Logit (or Logit Kernel) Model: Dispelling Misconceptions of Identification , 2002 .

[13]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies , 2008 .

[14]  G. Ewing,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preferences for Clean-Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Experiment , 2000 .

[15]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Testing Electric Vehicle Demand in `Hybrid Households' Using a Reflexive Survey , 1996 .

[16]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project , 1993 .

[17]  Felix Eggers,et al.  Where have all the flowers gone? Forecasting green trends in the automobile industry with a choice-based conjoint adoption model , 2011 .

[18]  K. Train,et al.  Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.