Correlation of compartment pressure data from an intraoperative sensing device with postoperative fluoroscopic kinematic results in TKA patients.

Fluoroscopy has recently been used to analyze postoperative kinematics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These analyses have reported varying results even in patients with similar implant design. In addition, patterns of wear in retrieved tibial polyethylene inserts of similar design have been found to vary substantially. These findings suggest that surgical technique, especially soft tissue balancing, may play a role in postoperative kinematics and implant failure. Accurate soft-tissue balancing is hypothesized to result in similar pressures within the medial and lateral compartments of the knee. However, a method of easily measuring these pressures at TKA has not been developed. In the present study, 32 patients were implanted with a mobile-bearing LCS TKA utilizing the balanced gap technique. An electronic pressure sensor, developed specifically to record pressure magnitude and distribution in the medial and lateral compartments, was incorporated into the implant trials. The knee was then passively taken through a range of motion while pressure data was recorded via computer. Postoperatively, 16 patients underwent active fluoroscopic kinematic analysis to assess for condylar liftoff and femorotibial translation. We found that abnormal compartment pressures and distributions as recorded by the intraoperative pressure sensor were correlated with inappropriate or paradoxical postoperative kinematics. In addition, subjects having similar pressures in both compartments throughout a range of motion did not experience condylar liftoff values greater than 1.0 mm. These data suggest that surgical technique influences the magnitude and distribution of forces at the articulation, postoperative kinematics, and likely, implant longevity.

[1]  H. Yamamoto,et al.  Soft-tissue balancing with pressure distribution during total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  J. Stiehl,et al.  Detrimental kinematics of a flat on flat total condylar knee arthroplasty. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J. Stiehl,et al.  Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  J. Stiehl,et al.  Mathematical model of the lower extremity joint reaction forces using Kane's method of dynamics. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  D. D’Lima,et al.  e-Knee: Evolution of the Electronic Knee Prosthesis Telemetry Technology Development , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  D A Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Knee Kinematics Derived Using an Inverse Perspective Technique , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  D A Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Anteroposterior Femorotibial Translation of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Richard D Komistek,et al.  Kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate sacrifice versus substitution in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  J O Galante,et al.  Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  R. Wasielewski The causes of insert backside wear in total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  W R Walsh,et al.  Intraoperative assessment of tibiofemoral contact stresses in total knee arthroplasty. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  J B Stiehl,et al.  In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.