A numerical study of magnetic resonance images of pulsatile flow in a two dimensional carotid bifurcation: a numerical study of MR images.

A numerical method to simulate magnetic resonance angiographic images is proposed. The new method greatly simplifies the calculation of the average phase in a voxel, the bottleneck of previous simulations, and reduces the computation time by more than a factor of 5. Both the Navier-Stokes and the Bloch equations are solved on the same mesh to obtain the distributions of the modulus and phase of the magnetization. The data in the frequency domain are reordered according to the gating strategy to generate the final images. Pulsatile flow through a 2D normal carotid bifurcation is considered as a test case. Images for magnetic resonance angiography with an uncompensated gradient waveform, a velocity-compensated gradient waveform and an uncompensated short-TE gradient waveform are compared. Systolic gating images are shown to have degraded image quality. Images acquired with diastolic-gating have little variation in magnetization strength throughout the pulsatile cycle and provide a better representation of the vessel lumen.

[1]  S. Berger,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the Flow in the Carotid Bifurcation , 1998 .

[2]  D. Ku,et al.  Pulsatile Flow and Atherosclerosis in the Human Carotid Bifurcation: Positive Correlation between Plaque Location and Low and Oscillating Shear Stress , 1985, Arteriosclerosis.

[3]  H. L. Stone ITERATIVE SOLUTION OF IMPLICIT APPROXIMATIONS OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 1968 .

[4]  B. Rutt,et al.  Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  D. Saloner,et al.  MR imaging of flow through tortuous vessels: A numerical simulation , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  D Saloner,et al.  Calculation of the magnetization distribution for fluid flow in curved vessels , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  D Saloner,et al.  Cardiac‐gated MR angiography of pulsatile flow: K‐space strategies , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  J. M. Siegel,et al.  Computational simulation of turbulent signal loss in 2D time‐of‐flight magnetic resonance angiograms , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Z Lou,et al.  A computer simulation of the non-Newtonian blood flow at the aortic bifurcation. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. H. Gao,et al.  Turbulent flow effects on NMR imaging: measurement of turbulent intensity. , 1991, Medical physics.

[11]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  Combined analysis of spatial and velocity displacement artifacts in phase contrast measurements of complex flows , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[13]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  Computational methods for fluid dynamics , 1996 .

[14]  D. Ku,et al.  Pulsatile Flow in a Model Carotid Bifurcation , 1983, Arteriosclerosis.

[15]  J. Gore,et al.  Echo-Planar-Imaging Studies of Turbulent Flow , 1996 .

[16]  J. M. Siegel,et al.  Comparison of phantom and computer‐simulated MR images of flow in a convergent geometry: Implications for improved two‐dimensional MR angiography , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  D. Giddens,et al.  Steady flow in a model of the human carotid bifurcation. Part I--flow visualization. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.