Reliable estimation of suppliers’ total cost of ownership: An imprecise data envelopment analysis model with common weights

Abstract Total cost of ownership (TCO) is a management accounting technique that evaluates the total cost of a business partnership using a time-consuming activity-based costing procedure. Studies have suggested that TCO-based data envelopment analysis (DEA) can effectively estimate the results of TCO with substantially less effort and time; however, its adoption in practice is limited due to certain shortcomings. First, managers struggle to understand and accept the uncommon weighting schemes of existing TCO-based DEA models because traditional TCO analyses require a common set of weights. Second, both the traditional TCO approach and TCO-based DEA models are designed to handle precise data, whereas TCO analyses often involve imprecise data from conflicting data sources and estimations. To address the managerial and technical issues of handling weighting schemes and imprecise data, this paper proposes a novel TCO-based model: common set of weights imprecise DEA (CSW-IDEA). We validate the proposed methodology using real-life datasets from 175 suppliers that serve five key components to two multinational mechanical manufacturers. For both precise data and imprecise data, the proposed CSW-IDEA reliably approximates traditional TCO calculations significantly better than existing TCO-based DEA. The cost savings that can be theoretically generated by applying the CSW-IDEA approach are similar to the cost savings estimated by the traditional TCO approach.

[1]  Arun Rai,et al.  The impact of sourcing enterprise system use and work process interdependence on sourcing professionals’ job outcomes , 2013 .

[2]  Alan Scheller-Wolf,et al.  Redundancy Optimization for Critical Components in High-Availability Technical Systems , 2013, Oper. Res..

[3]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  Selecting and full ranking suppliers with imprecise data: A new DEA method , 2014 .

[4]  Gökçe Esenduran,et al.  Why in the world did they reshore? Examining small to medium-sized manufacturer decisions , 2017 .

[5]  R. Silvi,et al.  Efficiency Measurement for Supplier Selection and Control: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2012 .

[6]  Tomoe Entani,et al.  Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Gang Yu,et al.  An Illustrative Application of Idea (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company , 2001, Oper. Res..

[8]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Within-group common weights in DEA: An analysis of power plant efficiency , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  D. Luzzini,et al.  Total cost of ownership along the supply chain: a model applied to the tinting industry , 2015 .

[10]  Seyed Jafar Sadjadi,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: An application for Iranian electricity distribution companies , 2008 .

[11]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Distinctive data envelopment analysis model for evaluating global environment performance , 2015 .

[12]  George Emm. Halkos,et al.  Weight assurance region in two-stage additive efficiency decomposition DEA model: an application to school data , 2015, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  L. Ellram Total cost of ownership: an analysis approach for purchasing , 1995 .

[14]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis based on the satisfaction degree , 2016, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  Haoxun Chen Average lexicographic efficiency for data envelopment analysis , 2018 .

[16]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A Common Set of Weight Approach Using an Ideal Decision Making Unit in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2012 .

[17]  Franco Visani,et al.  Business Performance Analytics: exploring the potential for Performance Management Systems , 2018 .

[18]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  Modeling Centralized Resources Allocation and Target Setting in Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[19]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[20]  R. Ramanathan Supplier selection problem: integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP , 2007 .

[21]  S. J. Sadjadi,et al.  A robust super-efficiency data envelopment analysis model for ranking of provincial gas companies in Iran , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[23]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A decision model for ranking suppliers in the presence of cardinal and ordinal data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors , 2009, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  S. Kotsiantis,et al.  Discretization Techniques: A recent survey , 2006 .

[25]  Tien-Hui Chen,et al.  Performance measurement of an enterprise and business units with an application to a Taiwanese hotel chain , 2009 .

[26]  Ke Wang,et al.  ROBUST DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS BASED MCDM WITH THE CONSIDERATION OF UNCERTAIN DATA , 2010 .

[27]  H. Omrani,et al.  Common weights data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: A robust optimization approach , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[28]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[29]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  Consistent and robust ranking in imprecise data envelopment analysis under perturbations of random subsets of data , 2014, OR Spectr..

[30]  Stanko Dimitrov,et al.  Generalized symmetric weight assignment technique: Incorporating managerial preferences in data envelopment analysis using a penalty function , 2013 .

[31]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Identification of inefficiencies in an additive model based IDEA (imprecise data envelopment analysis) , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[32]  L. Ellram Total Cost of Ownership: Elements and Implementation , 1993 .

[33]  Robert M. Monczka,et al.  Cost-Based Supplier Performance Evaluation , 1988 .

[34]  José L. Ruiz,et al.  Common benchmarking and ranking of units with DEA , 2016 .

[35]  W. Cooper,et al.  Idea and Ar-Idea: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in Dea , 1999 .

[36]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance , 1997 .

[37]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Efficiency evaluation with strong ordinal input and output measures , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Jiamin Wang,et al.  A comparative study of robust efficiency analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis with imprecise data , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  Dual-role factors for imprecise data envelopment analysis , 2017, Omega.

[40]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  AIDEA: a methodology for supplier evaluation and selection in a supplier-based manufacturing environment , 2007, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[41]  Alireza Davoodi,et al.  Common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: a linear programming problem , 2012, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A robust optimization approach for imprecise data envelopment analysis , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[43]  L. Warlop,et al.  Effects of Providing Total Cost of Ownership Information on Attribute Weights in Purchasing Decisions , 2011 .

[44]  Nezir Aydin,et al.  Combining Bayesian Networks and Total Cost of Ownership method for supplier selection analysis , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[45]  James A. Narus,et al.  Improving sourcing decisions in NPD projects: Monetary quantification of points of difference , 2009 .

[46]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  An interactive robust data envelopment analysis model for determining alternative targets in Iranian electricity distribution companies , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[47]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: The case of Taiwan forests after reorganization , 2010 .

[48]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  International supply chain management : strategic implications for the purchasing function , 1990 .

[49]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  Reza Mohammady Garfamy A data envelopment analysis approach based on total cost of ownership for supplier selection , 2006, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[51]  John V. Gray,et al.  Managing contract manufacturer quality in the presence of performance ambiguity , 2015 .

[52]  Koen Decancq,et al.  Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Well-Being: An Overview , 2010 .

[53]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[54]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Imprecise DEA via Standard Linear DEA Models with a Revisit to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company , 2004, Oper. Res..

[55]  Harish Garg,et al.  A new multi-component DEA approach using common set of weights methodology and imprecise data: an application to public sector banks in India with undesirable and shared resources , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[56]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A new benchmarking approach in Cold Chain , 2012 .

[57]  Josef Jablonsky,et al.  A new robust DEA model and super-efficiency measure , 2017 .

[58]  Maziar Salahi,et al.  An optimistic robust optimization approach to common set of weights in DEA , 2016 .

[59]  K. S. Park,et al.  Efficiency bounds and efficiency classifications in DEA with imprecise data , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[60]  Seyed Jafar Sadjadi,et al.  A bootstrapped robust data envelopment analysis model for efficiency estimating of telecommunication companies in Iran , 2010 .

[61]  D. Vigo,et al.  Supplier's total cost of ownership evaluation: a data envelopment analysis approach , 2016 .

[62]  Andrea Bacchetti,et al.  The total cost of ownership of durable consumer goods: A conceptual model and an empirical application , 2017 .

[63]  Izak Duenyas,et al.  Total-Cost Procurement Auctions: Impact of Suppliers' Cost Adjustments on Auction Format Choice , 2009, Manag. Sci..