Existentials, predication, and modification

AbstractThis paper offers a new semantic theory of existentials (sentences of the form There be NPpivotXPcoda) in which pivots are (second order) predicates and codas are modifiers. The theory retains the analysis of pivots as denoting generalized quantifiers (Barwise and Cooper 1981; Keenan 1987), but departs from previous analyses in analyzing codas as contextual modifiers on a par with temporal/locative frame adverbials. Existing analyses universally assume that pivots are arguments of some predicate, and that codas are main or secondary predicates. It is shown that these analyses cannot account for the behavior of codas with quantifiers and for the interaction of multiple codas, both of which receive a simple treatment on the proposed theory. The assimilation of codas to frame adverbials explains several semantic properties which have not been analyzed in the semantic literature, and that distinguish existentials from their copular counterparts. Furthermore, it highlights important properties of the semantics of modification and its relation to predication.

[1]  R. Freeze.  EXISTENTIALS AND OTHER LOCATIVES , 1992 .

[2]  Ilan Hazout,et al.  The Syntax of Existential Constructions , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[3]  Kai von Fintel,et al.  Bare Plurals, Bare Conditionals, and Only , 1997, J. Semant..

[4]  Robert N. Proctor,et al.  Factories of Death: Japanese Biological Warfare, 1932-45, and the American Cover-up , 1996 .

[5]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[6]  Makoto Kanazawa,et al.  Quantifiers, Deduction, and Context , 1996 .

[7]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  The Meaning of Free Choice , 2001 .

[8]  Dag Westerståhl,et al.  Determiners and Context Sets , 1985 .

[9]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[10]  S.-Y. Kuroda,et al.  The categorical and the thetic judgment , 1979 .

[11]  Jason Stanley,et al.  On Quantifier Domain Restriction , 2000 .

[12]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[13]  L. McNally.  An interpretation for the English existential construction , 1992 .

[14]  G. Chierchia.  Formal Semantics and the Grammar of Predication , 1985 .

[15]  James D. McCawley,et al.  Adverbial NPs: Bare or Clad in See-Through Garb? , 1988 .

[16]  Henriëtte de Swart,et al.  Meaning and Use of not...until , 1996, J. Semant..

[17]  Ron Artstein,et al.  Quantificational Arguments in Temporal Adjunct Clauses , 2005 .

[18]  H. Echternach.  The Problem of “Not” , 1971 .

[19]  L. McNally.  Existential Sentences without Existential Quantification , 1998 .

[20]  Alice G. B. ter Meulen,et al.  The representation of (in)definiteness , 1989 .

[21]  M. Galy,et al.  Papers from the tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 19-21, 1974 , 1974 .

[22]  E. Keenan.  The Definiteness Effect: Semantics or Pragmatics? , 2003 .

[23]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[24]  Alessandro Zucchi.  The ingredients of definiteness and the definiteness effect , 1995 .

[25]  Richard K. Larson,et al.  Bare-NP adverbs , 1985 .

[26]  Nissim Francez,et al.  Temporal Prepositions and Temporal Generalized Quantifiers , 2001 .

[27]  H. Sasse,et al.  "Theticity" and VS order: a case study , 1995 .

[28]  Ivano Caponigro,et al.  Silent prepositions: Evidence from free relatives * , 2008 .

[29]  Lyle Jenkins,et al.  The English existential , 1975 .

[30]  Nomi Erteschik-Shir,et al.  The dynamics of focus structure , 1997 .

[31]  Leonard H. Babby,et al.  Existential Sentences and Negation in Russian , 1982 .

[32]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[33]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Categorial grammar and the semantics of contextual prepositional phrases , 2006 .

[34]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Anaphora and dynamic binding , 1992 .

[35]  R. Declerck.  The problem of not...until , 1995 .

[36]  David R. Dowty.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in M , 1979 .

[37]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Bad Subject: (Non-)canonicality and NP Distribution in Existentials , 2005 .

[38]  Edit Doron,et al.  Verbless predicates in Hebrew , 1992 .

[39]  G. Milsark.  Existential sentences in English , 1979 .

[40]  Yehuda N. Falk,et al.  The Hebrew Present-Tense Copula as a Mixed Category , 2005 .

[41]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .

[42]  Veneeta Dayal,et al.  Any as Inherently Modal , 1998 .

[43]  Cleo Condoravdi,et al.  Punctual Until as a Scalar NPI , 2008 .

[44]  David R. Dowty.  Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[45]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Temporal Prepositional Phrases with Quantifiers: Some Additions to Pratt and Francez (2001) , 2002 .

[46]  Ken Safir,et al.  Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect , 1982 .

[47]  Zoltán Gendler Szabó.  Counting across times , 2006 .

[48]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  UNTIL, Aspect, and Negation: A Novel Argument for Two "Until"s , 2002 .

[49]  Dwight L. Bolinger,et al.  Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication , 1967 .

[50]  Raymond Turner,et al.  Semantics and property theory , 1988 .

[51]  K. Lambrecht.  When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence-focus constructions across languages , 2000 .

[52]  William A. Ladusaw,et al.  Restriction and Saturation , 2003 .

[53]  Jean Mark Gawron,et al.  The Context Dependency of Implicit Arguments , 1996 .