The Future is Now: Reducing Psychological Distance to Increase Public Engagement with Climate Change

Many people perceive climate change as psychologically distant—a set of uncertain events that might occur far in the future, impacting distant places and affecting people dissimilar to themselves. In this study, we employed construal level theory to investigate whether a climate change communication intervention could increase public engagement by reducing the psychological distance of climate change. Australian residents (N = 333) were randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions: one framed to increase psychological distance to climate change (distal frame), and the other framed to reduce psychological distance (proximal frame). Participants then completed measures of psychological distance of climate change impacts, climate change concern, and intentions to engage in mitigation behavior. Principal components analysis indicated that psychological distance to climate change was best conceptualized as a multidimensional construct consisting of four components: geographic, temporal, social, and uncertainty. Path analysis revealed the effect of the treatment frame on climate change concern and intentions was fully mediated by psychological distance dimensions related to uncertainty and social distance. Our results suggest that climate communications framed to reduce psychological distance represent a promising strategy for increasing public engagement with climate change.

[1]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[2]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change , 1999 .

[3]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  G. Menon,et al.  When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk , 2004 .

[5]  Anthony A Leiserowitz,et al.  American Risk Perceptions: Is Climate Change Dangerous? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  A. Leiserowitz.  Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[7]  P. Slovic,et al.  Risk Perception and Affect , 2006 .

[8]  Y. Trope,et al.  The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Y. Trope,et al.  Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. , 2007, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[12]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[13]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment , 2007 .

[14]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now , 2008, Science.

[15]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal Level and Procrastination , 2008, Psychological science.

[16]  N. Collins.  What do Australians say about climate change , 2009 .

[17]  Encouraging climate change engagement through affective connections , 2009 .

[18]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  The Effect of Construal Level on Subjective Probability Estimates , 2009, Psychological science.

[19]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[20]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  ThE PSyChOlOgy Of glOBAl WARMINg Improving the Fit between the Science and the Message , 2010 .

[21]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience , 2011 .

[22]  Y. Trope,et al.  The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance. , 2011, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[23]  A. Spence,et al.  Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change , 2011 .

[24]  R. Betts,et al.  International dimensions of climate change , 2012 .

[25]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy , 2012 .

[26]  N. Pidgeon.  Climate Change Risk Perception and Communication: Addressing a Critical Moment? , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  A. Spence,et al.  The Psychological Distance of Climate Change , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  G. Bradley,et al.  Public Risk Perceptions, Understandings, and Responses to Climate Change and Natural Disasters in Australia, 2010 and 2011 , 2012 .

[29]  Philip Ireland,et al.  Climate change adaptation: Business-as-usual aid and development or an emerging discourse for change? , 2012 .

[30]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Risk Communication, Public Engagement, and Climate Change: A Role for Emotions , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  Dorothea Hilhorst,et al.  Synthesis Report , 2018, Reshaping Decentralised Development Co-operation.

[32]  G. O’Brien.  Climate Change Adaptation , 2012 .

[33]  Teresa A. Myers,et al.  The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming , 2013 .

[34]  Dennis Fitzgerald,et al.  Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? , 2013 .

[35]  Susan E. Watt,et al.  Identifying climate change interpretive communities in a large Australian sample , 2013 .

[36]  Sarah Lappin,et al.  Climate change adaptation : a decision support framework to encourage environmentally responsible behaviour , 2013 .

[37]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Global perceptions of local temperature change , 2013 .

[38]  D. Hine,et al.  Audience segmentation and climate change communication: conceptual and methodological considerations , 2014 .

[39]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Public perception of cold weather events as evidence for and against climate change , 2014, Climatic Change.

[40]  Jennifer Price,et al.  Fourth annual survey of Australian attitudes to climate change: interim report , 2014 .

[41]  G. Bradley,et al.  Encountering climate change: ‘seeing’ is more than ‘believing’ , 2014 .

[42]  Leona Yi-Fan Su,et al.  YouTube, Social Norms and Perceived Salience of Climate Change in the American Mind , 2017 .

[43]  Ray W. Cooksey,et al.  Preaching to different choirs: How to motivate dismissive, uncommitted, and alarmed audiences to adapt to climate change? , 2016 .

[44]  D. Frey,et al.  Thinking Concretely Increases the Perceived Likelihood of Risks: The Effect of Construal Level on Risk Estimation , 2016, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.