Interannual variation in meteorologically adjusted ozone levels in the eastern United States : A comparison of two approaches

Abstract Assessing the influence of abatement efforts and other human activities on ozone levels is complicated by the atmosphere's changeable nature. Two statistical methods, the dynamic linear model (DLM) and the generalized additive model (GAM), are used to estimate ozone trends in the eastern United States and to adjust for meteorological effects. The techniques and resulting estimates are compared and contrasted for four monitoring locations chosen through principal components analysis to represent regional patterns of ozone concentrations. After adjustment for meteorological influence, overall downward trends are evident at all four locations from 1997 to 2004. The results indicate that the two methods’ estimates of ozone changes agree well. When such estimates are needed quickly, or when many similar, but separate analyses are required, the ease of implementation and relative simplicity of the GAMs are attractive. The DLMs are much more flexible, readily addressing such issues as autocorrelation, the presence of missing values, and estimation of long-term trends or cyclical patterns. Implementation of DLMs, however, is typically more difficult, and especially in the absence of an experienced practitioner, they may be better reserved for in-depth analyses.

[1]  P. Guttorp,et al.  A review of statistical methods for the meteorological adjustment of tropospheric ozone , 2001 .

[2]  Qing Yang,et al.  Modeling the effects of meteorology on ozone in Houston using cluster analysis and generalized additive models , 1998 .

[3]  D. Jacob,et al.  Long‐term trends in ground level ozone over the contiguous United States, 1980–1995 , 1998 .

[4]  Paul L. Speckman,et al.  A model for predicting maximum and 8 h average ozone in Houston , 1999 .

[5]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[6]  P. Brimblecombe,et al.  Chemistry of Atmospheres. , 1986 .

[7]  Jerry M. Davis,et al.  An Automated Classification Scheme Designed to Better Elucidate the Dependence of Ozone on Meteorology , 1994 .

[8]  B. Sansó,et al.  A stochastic model for tropical rainfall at a single location , 1999 .

[9]  William L. Chameides,et al.  Air quality management in the United States , 2005 .

[10]  M. West.  Bayesian Inference in Cyclical Component Dynamic Linear Models , 1995 .

[11]  E. Batchvarova,et al.  Wind climatology, atmospheric turbulence and internal boundary-layer development in Athens during the MEDCAPHOT-TRACE experiment , 1998 .

[12]  Gabriel Huerta,et al.  A spatiotemporal model for Mexico City ozone levels , 2004 .

[13]  G. Shaddick,et al.  Modelling daily multivariate pollutant data at multiple sites , 2002 .

[14]  Division on Earth.  Air Quality Management in the United States , 2004 .

[15]  Brian Eder,et al.  Spatio-temporal characterization of tropospheric ozone across the eastern United States , 2004 .

[16]  Brian K. Eder,et al.  A characterization of the spatiotemporal variability of non-urban ozone concentrations over the eastern United States , 1993 .

[17]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Accounting for meteorological effects in measuring urban ozone levels and trends , 1996 .