Joined at the hip: kinetochores, microtubules, and spindle assembly checkpoint signaling.

Error-free chromosome segregation relies on stable connections between kinetochores and spindle microtubules. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors such connections and relays their absence to the cell cycle machinery to delay cell division. The molecular network at kinetochores that is responsible for microtubule binding is integrated with the core components of the SAC signaling system. Molecular-mechanistic understanding of how the SAC is coupled to the kinetochore-microtubule interface has advanced significantly in recent years. The latest insights not only provide a striking view of the dynamics and regulation of SAC signaling events at the outer kinetochore but also create a framework for understanding how that signaling may be terminated when kinetochores and microtubules connect.

[1]  Keith F. DeLuca,et al.  Temporal changes in Hec1 phosphorylation control kinetochore–microtubule attachment stability during mitosis , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[2]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1–C-Mad2 core complex , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  A. Musacchio,et al.  Modular assembly of RWD domains on the Mis12 complex underlies outer kinetochore organization. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[4]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  G. Chin,et al.  Gene silencing of CENP-E by small interfering RNA in HeLa cells leads to missegregation of chromosomes after a mitotic delay. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[6]  K. Resing,et al.  Mps1 Activation Loop Autophosphorylation Enhances Kinase Activity* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Y. Mao,et al.  Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1 , 2003, Cell.

[8]  A. Musacchio,et al.  Homeostatic control of mitotic arrest. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[9]  Frederick R. Cross,et al.  KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint , 2011, Current Biology.

[10]  A. Musacchio,et al.  Structural organization of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[11]  Stephen S. Taylor,et al.  Re-evaluating the role of Tao1 in the spindle checkpoint , 2010, Chromosoma.

[12]  Conditional targeting of MAD1 to kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the spindle assembly checkpoint in metaphase , 2014, Chromosoma.

[13]  A. Murray,et al.  Mad2 and Mad3 Cooperate to Arrest Budding Yeast in Mitosis , 2012, Current Biology.

[14]  R. Medema,et al.  Aurora B potentiates Mps1 activation to ensure rapid checkpoint establishment at the onset of mitosis , 2011, Nature communications.

[15]  J. Pines,et al.  APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-Cdc20 to make the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[16]  J. Pines,et al.  Mad2 and the APC/C compete for the same site on Cdc20 to ensure proper chromosome segregation , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  E. Salmon,et al.  Spindle Checkpoint Protein Dynamics at Kinetochores in Living Cells , 2004, Current Biology.

[18]  S. Biggins,et al.  Mad1 kinetochore recruitment by Mps1-mediated phosphorylation of Bub1 signals the spindle checkpoint , 2014, Genes & development.

[19]  K. Hardwick,et al.  A Novel Protein Phosphatase 1-Dependent Spindle Checkpoint Silencing Mechanism , 2009, Current Biology.

[20]  K. Oegema,et al.  Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  D. Gerlich,et al.  Mps1 promotes rapid centromere accumulation of Aurora B , 2012, EMBO reports.

[22]  Nicole Hustedt,et al.  Mph1 kinetochore localization is crucial and upstream in the hierarchy of spindle assembly checkpoint protein recruitment to kinetochores , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[23]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1–Mad2 core complex: implications of a ‘safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[24]  A. Burlingame,et al.  Tpr directly binds to Mad1 and Mad2 and is important for the Mad1-Mad2-mediated mitotic spindle checkpoint. , 2008, Genes & development.

[25]  A. Musacchio,et al.  KI Motifs of Human Knl1 Enhance Assembly of Comprehensive Spindle Checkpoint Complexes around MELT Repeats , 2014, Current Biology.

[26]  S. Shieh,et al.  Phosphorylation at Threonine 288 by Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinase 2 (CHK2) Controls Human Monopolar Spindle 1 (Mps1) Kinetochore Localization* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  J. Rizo,et al.  The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[28]  J. DeLuca,et al.  KNL1: bringing order to the kinetochore , 2013, Chromosoma.

[29]  J. Nilsson,et al.  A minimal number of MELT repeats supports all the functions of KNL1 in chromosome segregation , 2014, Journal of Cell Science.

[30]  J. Pines,et al.  Cubism and the cell cycle: the many faces of the APC/C , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  Rey-Huei Chen,et al.  Mps1 Phosphorylation by MAP Kinase Is Required for Kinetochore Localization of Spindle-Checkpoint Proteins , 2006, Current Biology.

[32]  Hao Jiang,et al.  A microtubule-associated zinc finger protein, BuGZ, regulates mitotic chromosome alignment by ensuring Bub3 stability and kinetochore targeting. , 2014, Developmental cell.

[33]  A Khodjakov,et al.  The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  The Mad1/Mad2 Complex as a Template for Mad2 Activation in the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint , 2005, Current Biology.

[35]  Anna Feoktistova,et al.  The Spindle Checkpoint Functions of Mad3 and Mad2 Depend on a Mad3 KEN Box-mediated Interaction with Cdc20-Anaphase-promoting Complex (APC/C)*S⃞♦ , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  M. Yanagida,et al.  Protein Interaction Domain Mapping of Human Kinetochore Protein Blinkin Reveals a Consensus Motif for Binding of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Proteins Bub1 and BubR1 , 2011, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  Yingming Zhao,et al.  Autophosphorylation-dependent activation of human Mps1 is required for the spindle checkpoint , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  B. Snel,et al.  Arrayed BUB recruitment modules in the kinetochore scaffold KNL1 promote accurate chromosome segregation , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  T. Kruse,et al.  Direct binding between BubR1 and B56–PP2A phosphatase complexes regulate mitotic progression , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[40]  Christian Widmer,et al.  Determinants of robustness in spindle assembly checkpoint signalling , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[41]  Tomohiro Matsumoto,et al.  Centromere-tethered Mps1 pombe homolog (Mph1) kinase is a sufficient marker for recruitment of the spindle checkpoint protein Bub1, but not Mad1 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Structure of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Interacting with a Mitotic Checkpoint Complex , 2009, Science.

[43]  C. Sunkel,et al.  Spatiotemporal control of mitosis by the conserved spindle matrix protein Megator , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  Juri Rappsilber,et al.  The Protein Composition of Mitotic Chromosomes Determined Using Multiclassifier Combinatorial Proteomics , 2010, Cell.

[45]  Xia Ding,et al.  Phosphorylation of Microtubule-binding Protein Hec1 by Mitotic Kinase Aurora B Specifies Spindle Checkpoint Kinase Mps1 Signaling at the Kinetochore* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  G. Kops,et al.  Integration of kinase and phosphatase activities by BUBR1 ensures formation of stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[47]  K. Oegema,et al.  Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells. , 2010, Genes & development.

[48]  P. Meraldi,et al.  Bub1 regulates chromosome segregation in a kinetochore-independent manner , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  A. Desai,et al.  The Conserved KMN Network Constitutes the Core Microtubule-Binding Site of the Kinetochore , 2006, Cell.

[50]  M. Lampson,et al.  Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint , 2014, The Journal of cell biology.

[51]  M. Solomon,et al.  Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. , 2007, Genes & development.

[52]  S. Elowe,et al.  Bub1 and BubR1: at the Interface between Chromosome Attachment and the Spindle Checkpoint , 2011, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[53]  Stefan Kemmler,et al.  Mimicking Ndc80 phosphorylation triggers spindle assembly checkpoint signalling , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[54]  A. Musacchio,et al.  Structural analysis reveals features of the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1–kinetochore subunit Knl1 interaction , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  J. Nilsson Looping in on Ndc80 – How does a protein loop at the kinetochore control chromosome segregation? , 2012, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[56]  I. Poser,et al.  Re-examination of siRNA specificity questions role of PICH and Tao1 in the spindle checkpoint and identifies Mad2 as a sensitive target for small RNAs , 2009, Chromosoma.

[57]  J. Olsen,et al.  A direct role of Mad1 in the spindle assembly checkpoint beyond Mad2 kinetochore recruitment , 2014, EMBO reports.

[58]  A. Murray,et al.  A brief history of error , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[59]  S. Geley,et al.  Spindly/CCDC99 Is Required for Efficient Chromosome Congression and Mitotic Checkpoint Regulation , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[60]  Mathijs Vleugel,et al.  The vertebrate mitotic checkpoint protein BUBR1 is an unusual pseudokinase. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[61]  A. Ciliberto,et al.  Evidence that Aurora B is implicated in spindle checkpoint signalling independently of error correction , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[62]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment Relies on the Disordered N-Terminal Tail Domain of Hec1 , 2008, Current Biology.

[63]  E. Logarinho,et al.  The human spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3 is required for the establishment of efficient kinetochore-microtubule attachments. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[64]  Andrea Ciliberto,et al.  Bub3 reads phosphorylated MELT repeats to promote spindle assembly checkpoint signaling , 2013, eLife.

[65]  R. Medema,et al.  Mps1 Phosphorylates Borealin to Control Aurora B Activity and Chromosome Alignment , 2008, Cell.

[66]  B. Snel,et al.  Evolution and function of the mitotic checkpoint. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[67]  E. Nigg,et al.  Role of Hec1 in Spindle Checkpoint Signaling and Kinetochore Recruitment of Mad1/Mad2 , 2002, Science.

[68]  J. R. Daum,et al.  The highly conserved Ndc80 complex is required for kinetochore assembly, chromosome congression, and spindle checkpoint activity. , 2003, Genes & development.

[69]  T. Blundell,et al.  Structure of a Blinkin-BUBR1 Complex Reveals an Interaction Crucial for Kinetochore-Mitotic Checkpoint Regulation via an Unanticipated Binding Site , 2011, Structure.

[70]  Yuya Yamagishi,et al.  MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[71]  J. Rappsilber,et al.  Phosphodependent Recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/KNL1 by Mph1 Kinase Maintains the Spindle Checkpoint , 2012, Current Biology.

[72]  Jamin B. Hein,et al.  Stable MCC binding to the APC/C is required for a functional spindle assembly checkpoint , 2014, EMBO reports.

[73]  Benjamin A. Pinsky,et al.  Protein Phosphatase 1 Regulates Exit from the Spindle Checkpoint in Budding Yeast , 2009, Current Biology.

[74]  Emily J. Girard,et al.  BuGZ is required for Bub3 stability, Bub1 kinetochore function, and chromosome alignment. , 2014, Developmental cell.

[75]  T. Hori,et al.  Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[76]  M. Langegger,et al.  Mad1 contribution to spindle assembly checkpoint signalling goes beyond presenting Mad2 at kinetochores , 2014, EMBO reports.

[77]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  APC15 mediates CDC20 autoubiquitylation by APC/CMCC and disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex , 2012, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[78]  W. Earnshaw,et al.  The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[79]  P. Jallepalli,et al.  Nuclear Pores Protect Genome Integrity by Assembling a Premitotic and Mad1-Dependent Anaphase Inhibitor , 2014, Cell.

[80]  A. Musacchio Spindle assembly checkpoint: the third decade , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[81]  D. Cleveland,et al.  Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[82]  T. Kapoor,et al.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[83]  Stephen S. Taylor,et al.  The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint , 2012, Current Biology.

[84]  T. Dansen,et al.  Release of Mps1 from kinetochores is crucial for timely anaphase onset , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[85]  The Mad2 partial unfolding model: regulating mitosis through Mad2 conformational switching , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[86]  Stephen S. Taylor,et al.  Bub1 maintains centromeric cohesion by activation of the spindle checkpoint. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[87]  D. Morgan,et al.  The APC/C subunit Mnd2/Apc15 promotes Cdc20 autoubiquitination and spindle assembly checkpoint inactivation. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[88]  A. Amon,et al.  Chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in cancer: from yeast to man , 2012, EMBO reports.

[89]  Y. Watanabe Temporal and spatial regulation of targeting aurora B to the inner centromere. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[90]  J. Pines,et al.  Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[91]  T. Kapoor,et al.  Formation of stable attachments between kinetochores and microtubules depends on the B56-PP2A phosphatase , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[92]  J. Millar,et al.  Spindle checkpoint silencing requires association of PP1 to both Spc7 and kinesin-8 motors. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[93]  Anatoly V. Zaytsev,et al.  Accurate phosphoregulation of kinetochore–microtubule affinity requires unconstrained molecular interactions , 2014, The Journal of cell biology.

[94]  Brian D. Cook,et al.  Crosstalk Between Microtubule Attachment Complexes Ensures Accurate Chromosome Segregation , 2013, Science.

[95]  D. Gerlich,et al.  Kinetic framework of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[96]  D. Cleveland,et al.  Catalytic assembly of the mitotic checkpoint inhibitor BubR1-Cdc20 by a Mad2-induced functional switch in Cdc20. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[97]  Sue Biggins,et al.  Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 Regulates Bub1 Localization to Kinetochores , 2012, Current Biology.

[98]  B. Snel,et al.  A TPR domain–containing N-terminal module of MPS1 is required for its kinetochore localization by Aurora B , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[99]  Julia Kamenz,et al.  Slow Checkpoint Activation Kinetics as a Safety Device in Anaphase , 2014, Current Biology.

[100]  Jeremy Minshull,et al.  The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[101]  T. Kapoor,et al.  Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[102]  H. Maiato,et al.  Spindle assembly checkpoint robustness requires Tpr-mediated regulation of Mad1/Mad2 proteostasis , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[103]  Stephen S. Taylor,et al.  p31comet-mediated extraction of Mad2 from the MCC promotes efficient mitotic exit , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[104]  R. Karess,et al.  Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[105]  D. Barford,et al.  Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex , 2012, Nature.

[106]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Sustained Mps 1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad 2 to the Mad 1 – C-Mad 2 core complex , 2010 .

[107]  J. Shah,et al.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint , 2012, Chromosoma.