Combining Spectral Data and a DSM from UAS-Images for Improved Classification of Non-Submerged Aquatic Vegetation

Monitoring of aquatic vegetation is an important component in the assessment of freshwater ecosystems. Remote sensing with unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) can provide sub-decimetre-resolution aerial images and is a useful tool for detailed vegetation mapping. In a previous study, non-submerged aquatic vegetation was successfully mapped using automated classification of spectral and textural features from a true-colour UAS-orthoimage with 5-cm pixels. In the present study, height data from a digital surface model (DSM) created from overlapping UAS-images has been incorporated together with the spectral and textural features from the UAS-orthoimage to test if classification accuracy can be improved further. We studied two levels of thematic detail: (a) Growth forms including the classes of water, nymphaeid, and helophyte; and (b) dominant taxa including seven vegetation classes. We hypothesized that the incorporation of height data together with spectral and textural features would increase classification accuracy as compared to using spectral and textural features alone, at both levels of thematic detail. We tested our hypothesis at five test sites (100 m × 100 m each) with varying vegetation complexity and image quality using automated object-based image analysis in combination with Random Forest classification. Overall accuracy at each of the five test sites ranged from 78% to 87% at the growth-form level and from 66% to 85% at the dominant-taxon level. In comparison to using spectral and textural features alone, the inclusion of height data increased the overall accuracy significantly by 4%–21% for growth-forms and 3%–30% for dominant taxa. The biggest improvement gained by adding height data was observed at the test site with the most complex vegetation. Height data derived from UAS-images has a large potential to efficiently increase the accuracy of automated classification of non-submerged aquatic vegetation, indicating good possibilities for operative mapping.

[1]  Pamela Elizabeth Clark,et al.  Principles of Remote Sensing , 2010 .

[2]  H. Hirschmüller Ieee Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1 Stereo Processing by Semi-global Matching and Mutual Information , 2022 .

[3]  R. Pontius,et al.  Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment , 2011 .

[4]  Heather Reese,et al.  Comparison of Manual Mapping and Automated Object-Based Image Analysis of Non-Submerged Aquatic Vegetation from Very-High-Resolution UAS Images , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Heather Reese,et al.  Combining airborne laser scanning data and optical satellite data for classification of alpine vegetation , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[6]  M. Rothermel,et al.  QUALITY OF 3D POINT CLOUDS FROM HIGHLY OVERLAPPING UAV IMAGERY , 2013 .

[7]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[8]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2016 .

[9]  Gunter Menz,et al.  Seasonal Vegetation Changes in the Malinda Wetland Using Bi-Temporal, Multi-Sensor, Very High Resolution Remote Sensing Data Sets , 2014 .

[10]  Naser El-Sheimy,et al.  Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Digital Imaging System to Derive a 3D Point Cloud for Landslide Scarp Recognition , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Robert N. Colwell,et al.  Manual of Photographic Interpretation , 1961 .

[12]  A. Tamminga,et al.  Hyperspatial Remote Sensing of Channel Reach Morphology and Hydraulic Fish Habitat Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV): A First Assessment in the Context of River Research and Management , 2015 .

[13]  David L. Cotten,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Systems and Structure from Motion Revolutionize Wetlands Mapping , 2015 .

[14]  Keith C. Pelletier,et al.  Wetland Mapping in the Upper Midwest United States: An Object-Based Approach Integrating Lidar and Imagery Data , 2014 .

[15]  Jonas Bohlin,et al.  Combining point clouds from image matching with SPOT 5 multispectral data for mountain vegetation classification , 2015 .

[16]  Jeffrey K. Gillan,et al.  Modeling vegetation heights from high resolution stereo aerial photography: an application for broad-scale rangeland monitoring. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  S. Tesfamichael,et al.  WETLAND ASSESSMENT USING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2016 .

[18]  Julien Radoux,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Geographical Information Science Thematic Accuracy Assessment of Geographic Object-based Image Classification Thematic Accuracy Assessment of Geographic Object-based Image Classification , 2022 .

[19]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[20]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Combining optical satellite data and airborne laser scanner data for vegetation classification , 2012 .

[21]  T. Pock,et al.  Point Clouds: Lidar versus 3D Vision , 2010 .

[22]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[23]  G. Vosselman,et al.  SEGMENTATION OF UAV-BASED IMAGES INCORPORATING 3D POINT CLOUD INFORMATION , 2015 .

[24]  J. Holmgren,et al.  The potential of digital surface models based on aerial images for automated vegetation mapping , 2015 .

[25]  Heiko Hirschmüller,et al.  Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information , 2008, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[26]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change , 2014 .

[27]  A. Lechner,et al.  CHARACTERISING UPLAND SWAMPS USING OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION METHODS AND HYPER-SPATIAL RESOLUTION IMAGERY DERIVED FROM AN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE , 2012 .

[28]  Jungho Im,et al.  Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data for object-based forest species classification , 2010 .