Eyes-closed brain computer interface using modulation of steady-state visually evoked potential and auditory steady-state response

This paper proposes a binary brain computer interface (BCI) which is independent of eye-gaze and eye-movement. The proposed approach focuses on modulations of steady-state responses in the EEG to flicker (visual stimuli) and amplitude-modulated tone (auditory stimuli) independently. The modulations of the steady-state response could be elicited by performing a mental task under the flicker stimuli and paying attention to a target tone burst, respectively. For the BCI based on the modulation of steady-state visual response, we recruited eighteen normal subjects aged 21–24 with normal or corrected-to-normal vision. A linear discriminant classifier was used to discriminate between task-engaging and relaxed states. Classification performance depended on the subjects, electrode locations, mental tasks and flickering frequencies and the mean classification accuracy reached 78∼88 % under the flickering frequency of 10 Hz and 61∼88 % under that of 14 Hz across the subjects at the optimal electrode site, respectively. For another BCI based on the auditory steady-state response, the present study exploited a stochastic resonance effect and obtained the mean classification accuracy of 77 % for noise-added condition for the four electrode sites along one of the two lateral hemispheres across nine normal subjects aged 21–24 using a support vector machine. It is feasible to develop the eye gaze- and movement-independent BCI by optimizing the parameters such as stimulation type and electrode sites.

[1]  D. Regan Electrical responses evoked from the human brain. , 1979, Scientific American.

[2]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials: suitable brain signals for brain-computer interfaces? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  M. Ghanim,et al.  Diversity and Localization of Bacterial Endosymbionts from Whitefly Species Collected in Brazil , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  G Calhoun,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Luca Citi,et al.  Defining brain–machine interface applications by matching interface performance with device requirements , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  T. Elbert,et al.  Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Event-related cortical desynchronization detected by power measurements of scalp EEG. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[10]  P. Nunez,et al.  Steady state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) topography in a graded working memory task. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  J J Vidal,et al.  Toward direct brain-computer communication. , 1973, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[12]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  Classification of selective attention to auditory stimuli: Toward vision-free brain–computer interfacing , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Brain-computer communication: self-regulation of slow cortical potentials for verbal communication. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  H. S. Wolff,et al.  iRun: Horizontal and Vertical Shape of a Region-Based Graph Compression , 2022, Sensors.

[15]  Jan B. F. van Erp,et al.  A Tactile P300 Brain-Computer Interface , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[16]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  Atsushi Matsubara,et al.  Evidence of stochastic resonance of auditory steady-state response in electroencephalogram for brain machine interface , 2015, 2015 IEEE 4th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE).

[18]  Cheng Ming,et al.  An EEG-based cursor control system , 1999, Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference. 1999 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 21st Annual Conference and the 1999 Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (Cat. N.

[19]  Jaime Gómez Gil,et al.  Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review , 2012, Sensors.

[20]  Jonathan R. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–Computer InterfacesPrinciples and Practice , 2012 .

[21]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses , 2003, Hearing Research.

[22]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Towards an independent brain–computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A high-ITR SSVEP-based BCI speller , 2014 .

[24]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  An online brain-computer interface based on shifting attention to concurrent streams of auditory stimuli. , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  Shoichi Kai,et al.  Noise-induced entrainment and stochastic resonance in human brain waves. , 2002, Physical review letters.