Exploring the intention-behavior gap in the technology acceptance model: A mixed-methods study in the context of foreign-language teaching in China

This study explored the strength and mechanisms of the intention‐use link in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), based on data from a sample of 198 in‐service college‐level foreign‐language teachers in China. Its sequential explanatory research design involved, firstly, a quantitative approach to examine the structural relations among the TAM's variables, using path analysis on survey data; and secondly, qualitative interviews with a purposive sub‐sample of 16 of the same teachers, aimed at identifying potential influences on the intention‐behavior gap in their student‐centered technology use. Analysis of the quantitative data indicated a significant relationship between the teachers' intention to use technology and their teacher‐centered technology use of technology, but a non‐significant relationship between intention to use technology and their student‐centered technology use. The qualitative data revealed that facilitating conditions, prior experience with technology and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) were the main obstacles to the interviewees' student‐centered technology use. Other factors also played a role in educators' intention‐use gaps, including habit, beliefs in students, Chinese teaching culture and assessment pressure. Practitioner NotesWhat is already known about this topic TAM has been supported by a multitude of studies.Previous findings on intention‐behavior linkage in TAM are inconclusive.Foreign language teachers' student‐centered technology use is limited.What this paper adds It conceptualizes two levels of technology use behavior using TAM as framework.It identifies an intention‐behavior gap in student‐centered technology use.It explores external and internal constraints to student‐centered technology use.Implications for practice and/or policy Educational institutions need to facilitate teachers' student‐centered technology use.Consistent training on integrating student‐centered technology use with teaching content are in need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] uracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

[1]  Ronny Scherer,et al.  The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Greg Kessler,et al.  Technology and the future of language teaching , 2018 .

[3]  Mingming Zhou,et al.  Traditional vs. innovative uses of computers among mathematics pre-service teachers in Serbia , 2017, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[4]  P. Sheeran.  Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review , 2002 .

[5]  J. Fraillon,et al.  Preparing for life in a digital age , 2014 .

[6]  C. Lin,et al.  Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: a survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China , 2017 .

[7]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage , 1992 .

[8]  Xiaogang Wu,et al.  Higher education, elite formation and social stratification in contemporary China: Preliminary findings from the Beijing College Students Panel Survey , 2017 .

[9]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[10]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[11]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation , 1985 .

[13]  Philip L. Hubbard,et al.  CALL and the Future of Language Teacher Education , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[14]  Li Li.  Understanding language teachers' practice with educational technology: A case from China , 2014 .

[15]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[16]  R. Clark,et al.  Supplementing Western Perspectives of Learner-Centered Instruction With a Daoist Approach Towards Authentic Power Sharing in the Classroom , 2019, International Journal of Contemporary Education.

[17]  Hui-Min Lai,et al.  Why do teachers continue to use teaching blogs? The roles of perceived voluntariness and habit , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Guofang Li,et al.  Primary EFL Teachers’ Technology Use in China: Patterns and Perceptions , 2011 .

[19]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Hui Du,et al.  Hindrances to the new teaching goals of College English in China , 2015, English Today.

[21]  Philip Fei Wu,et al.  A Mixed Methods Approach to Technology Acceptance Research , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Guofang Li,et al.  Technology as an Educational Equalizer for EFL Learning in Rural China? Evidence from the Impact of Technology-Assisted Practices on Teacher-Student Interaction in Primary Classrooms , 2018, Language and Literacy.

[23]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Explicating the influences that explain intention to use technology among English teachers in China , 2018, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[24]  Min Kyu Kim,et al.  Teacher Beliefs and Technology Integration. , 2013 .

[25]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares , 2015, Health psychology review.

[26]  Ali Bostancıoğlu,et al.  Developing and validating a questionnaire for evaluating the EFL ‘Total PACKage’: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) , 2018 .

[27]  Marjolein Drent,et al.  Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[29]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  External variables, beliefs, attitudes and information technology usage behavior , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[30]  Guofang Li,et al.  Use of Technology to Support the Learning and Teaching of English in China , 2012 .

[31]  Nicolae Nistor,et al.  When technology acceptance models won't work: Non-significant intention-behavior effects , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[33]  Ángel Francisco Agudo-Peregrina,et al.  Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Ruben Vanderlinde,et al.  Getting inside the black box of technology integration in education: Teachers' stimulated recall of classroom observations , 2013 .

[35]  Hongwei Du,et al.  Toward a better understanding of behavioral intention and system usage constructs , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Preservice English as a Foreign Language Teachers’ Acceptance of Computer-Assisted Language Learning 2.0 in the People’s Republic of China , 2018 .

[37]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[38]  I. Ajzen.  Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology , 1987 .

[39]  G. Hu.  Potential Cultural Resistance to Pedagogical Imports: The Case of Communicative Language Teaching in China , 2002 .

[40]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher Technology Change , 2010 .