Effects of preferential transport in turbulent bluff-body-stabilized lean premixed CH4/air flames

Abstract Preferential species diffusion is known to have important effects on local flame structure in turbulent premixed flames, and differential diffusion of heat and mass can have significant effects on both local flame structure and global flame parameters, such as turbulent flame speed. However, models for turbulent premixed combustion normally assume that atomic mass fractions are conserved from reactants to fully burnt products. Experiments reported here indicate that this basic assumption may be incorrect for an important class of turbulent flames. Measurements of major species and temperature in the near field of turbulent, bluff-body stabilized, lean premixed methane–air flames (Le = 0.98) reveal significant departures from expected conditional mean compositional structure in the combustion products as well as within the flame. Net increases exceeding 10% in the equivalence ratio and the carbon-to-hydrogen atom ratio are observed across the turbulent flame brush. Corresponding measurements across an unstrained laminar flame at similar equivalence ratio are in close agreement with calculations performed using Chemkin with the GRI 3.0 mechanism and multi-component transport, confirming accuracy of experimental techniques. Results suggest that the large effects observed in the turbulent bluff-body burner are cause by preferential transport of H 2 and H 2 O through the preheat zone ahead of CO 2 and CO, followed by convective transport downstream and away from the local flame brush. This preferential transport effect increases with increasing velocity of reactants past the bluff body and is apparently amplified by the presence of a strong recirculation zone where excess CO 2 is accumulated.

[1]  de Lph Philip Goey,et al.  Modelling of premixed counterflow flames using the flamelet-generated manifold method , 2002 .

[2]  Robert K. Cheng,et al.  Numerical simulation of Lewis number effects on lean premixed turbulent flames , 2007 .

[3]  Hong G. Im,et al.  Preferential diffusion effects on the burning rate of interacting turbulent premixed hydrogen-air flames , 2002 .

[4]  Friedrich Dinkelacker,et al.  Modelling and simulation of lean premixed turbulent methane/hydrogen/air flames with an effective Lewis number approach , 2011 .

[5]  N. Chakraborty,et al.  Effects of Lewis number on turbulent scalar transport and its modelling in turbulent premixed flames , 2009 .

[6]  R. Barlow,et al.  Simultaneous rayleigh, raman, and LIF measurements in turbulent premixed methane-air flames , 1998 .

[7]  F. Tap,et al.  Impact of detailed chemistry and transport models on turbulent combustion simulations , 2004 .

[8]  Valerio Pascucci,et al.  Turbulence effects on cellular burning structures in lean premixed hydrogen flames , 2009 .

[9]  R. Barlow,et al.  A hybrid method for data evaluation in 1-D Raman spectroscopy , 2011 .

[10]  Robert W. Dibble,et al.  Investigation of differential diffusion in turbulent jet flows using planar laser Rayleigh scattering , 2005 .

[11]  R. Barlow,et al.  Piloted methane/air jet flames: Transport effects and aspects of scalar structure , 2005 .

[12]  J. Chomiak,et al.  Molecular transport effects on turbulent flame propagation and structure , 2005 .

[13]  Robert S. Barlow,et al.  Laser diagnostics and their interplay with computations to understand turbulent combustion , 2007 .

[14]  M. C. Drake,et al.  Raman measurements and conserved scalar modeling inturbulent diffusion flames , 1982 .

[15]  Denis Veynante,et al.  Turbulent combustion modeling , 2002, VKI Lecture Series.

[16]  Egon Hassel,et al.  Laser diagnostics for studies of turbulent combustion , 2000 .

[17]  Yung-cheng Chen,et al.  Experimental investigation of three-dimensional flame-front structure in premixed turbulent combustion , 2004 .

[18]  R. Barlow,et al.  A comparative analysis of flame surface density metrics inpremixed and stratified flames , 2011 .

[19]  Andreas Dreizler,et al.  Multi-scalar measurements in a premixed swirl burner using 1D Raman/Rayleigh scattering , 2009 .

[20]  Norbert Peters,et al.  The detailed flame structure of highly stretched turbulent premixed methane-air flames , 1996 .

[21]  Wolfgang Meier,et al.  Detailed characterization of the dynamics of thermoacoustic pulsations in a lean premixed swirl flame , 2007 .

[22]  H. Pitsch Unsteady Flamelet Modeling of Differential Diffusion in Turbulent Jet Diffusion Flames , 2000 .

[23]  Ö. Gülder,et al.  Effects of H2 and H preferential diffusion and unity Lewis number on superadiabatic flame temperatures in rich premixed methane flames , 2005 .

[24]  Ö. Gülder,et al.  Effects of Pressure and Preheat on Super-Adiabatic Flame Temperatures in Rich Premixed Methane/Air Flames , 2008 .

[25]  Alexandre Ern,et al.  Multicomponent transport impact on turbulent premixed H2/O2 flames , 2002 .

[26]  R. Barlow,et al.  Application of Raman/Rayleigh/LIF diagnostics in turbulent stratified flames , 2009 .

[27]  Jacqueline H. Chen,et al.  The mechanism of two-dimensional pocket formation in lean premixed methane-air flames with implications to turbulent combustion , 1999 .

[28]  Joseph F. Grcar,et al.  The Soret effect in naturally propagating, premixed, lean, hydrogen–air flames , 2009 .