Comparison of noise equivalent count rates and image noise
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Watson,et al. Count rate dependence of local signal-to-noise ratio in positron emission tomography , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[2] W. J. Lorenz,et al. Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR + , 1997 .
[3] Z. Burbar,et al. The ECAT HRRT: an example of NEMA scatter estimation issues for LSO based PET systems , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).
[4] E. Hoffman,et al. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[5] E. Hoffman,et al. Performance standards in positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[6] S. Surti,et al. Count-rate dependent event mispositioning and NEC in PET , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[7] Irène Buvat,et al. A bootstrap approach for analyzing the statistical properties of SPECT and PET images , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).
[8] S. Cherry,et al. Optimization of PET instrumentation for brain activation studies , 1992, IEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging.
[9] E. Hoffman,et al. Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .
[10] R. Huesman. A new fast algorithm for the evaluation of regions of interest and statistical uncertainty in computed tomography. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.
[11] Magnus Dahlbom,et al. Estimation of image noise in PET using the bootstrap method , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).