Placing a tool in the spotlight: spatial attention modulates visuomotor responses in cortex

Visual spatial attention has long been associated with facilitatory effects on visual perception. Here, we report that spatial attention can also modulate implicit visuomotor processing in dorsal regions of human cortex. Participants underwent fMRI scanning while performing a voluntary attentional orienting task that varied the category of a task-irrelevant object in the attended location (tool vs. non-tool). Data were then analyzed as a function of the attended location (left vs. right visual field) and the object category in that location. We found that the fMRI BOLD response in two visuomotor-related regions--the supplementary motor area (SMA) and the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL)--showed an interaction between the location of attention and the location of the tool in the bilateral display. Further, these responses were statistically distinct from those regions in dorsal cortex showing activity modulated only by the tool location or only by the attended location. While the effects of attending non-foveally within the visual field have been well documented in relation to visual perception, our findings support the proposal that voluntary visuospatial attention may also have consequences for the implicit planning of object-directed actions.

[1]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attention, Space, and Action: Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2001 .

[2]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  D. Boles,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Stimulus Type, Display Type, and Input Variable Contributions to Visual Field Asymmetry , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  R. Ellis,et al.  Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[5]  G R Mangun,et al.  Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  G. Mangun Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[7]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape , 2003, Nature.

[8]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Mechanisms and models of se-lective attention , 1995 .

[9]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[10]  K. D. Singh,et al.  Negative BOLD in the visual cortex: Evidence against blood stealing , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[11]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  R. Passingham,et al.  The left parietal cortex and motor attention , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  P. Strick,et al.  Imaging the premotor areas , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Attention to Action: Specific Modulation of Corticocortical Interactions in Humans , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[20]  M. Rushworth,et al.  The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.

[22]  P. Fox,et al.  Retinotopic organization of early visual spatial attention effects as revealed by PET and ERPs , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[23]  J. Bullier,et al.  Anatomical segregation of two cortical visual pathways in the macaque monkey , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[24]  B Giesbrecht,et al.  Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention , 2003, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[26]  Richard T. Dyde,et al.  Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[29]  J B Poline,et al.  Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[31]  G. Luppino,et al.  Parietofrontal Circuits for Action and Space Perception in the Macaque Monkey , 2001, NeuroImage.

[32]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[33]  R. Passingham,et al.  The Attentional Role of the Left Parietal Cortex: The Distinct Lateralization and Localization of Motor Attention in the Human Brain , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  John L Bradshaw,et al.  Asymmetries in preparation for action , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.

[36]  R. Passingham,et al.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[37]  J R Hodges,et al.  "What" and "how": evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action , 2002 .

[39]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[40]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[41]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  A. B. Mayer,et al.  Visuomotor transformations: early cortical mechanisms of reaching , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[47]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[48]  R. Klein,et al.  Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  David B. Boles,et al.  Hemispheric Interaction in Visual Field Asymmetry , 1983, Cortex.

[50]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Chua,et al.  Influence of terminal action requirements on action-centered distractor effects , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[53]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[55]  C. J. Downing Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  Monitoring the Visual World: Hemispheric Asymmetries and Subcortical Processes in Attention , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Removal of Confounding Effects of Global Signal in Functional MRI Analyses , 2001, NeuroImage.

[59]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  M. Raichle,et al.  The neural correlates of consciousness: an analysis of cognitive skill learning. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[61]  E. Marg A VISION OF THE BRAIN , 1994 .

[62]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  S. Zeki A vision of the brain , 1993 .

[64]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Inferential Impact of Global Signal Covariates in Functional Neuroimaging Analyses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[66]  Richard Dyde,et al.  Why do some perceptual illusions affect visually guided action, when others don't? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex , 2000, Neuroreport.

[68]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Action and perception: Evidence against converging selection processes , 2002 .

[69]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[70]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. , 1995 .

[71]  H. Deubel,et al.  Selective Dorsal and Ventral Processing: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism in Reaching and Perception , 1998 .

[72]  A. Shmuel,et al.  Sustained Negative BOLD, Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption Response and Its Coupling to the Positive Response in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[73]  P. Halligan,et al.  The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[74]  A. Dale,et al.  The Retinotopy of Visual Spatial Attention , 1998, Neuron.

[75]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Eye-hand coordination during reaching. I. Anatomical relationships between parietal and frontal cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[76]  P. Haggard,et al.  Localising awareness of action with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[77]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Discrete Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Color and Knowledge of Action , 1995, Science.

[78]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Multiple levels of representation of reaching in the parieto-frontal network. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[79]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Hemispheric control of spatial attention , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[80]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[81]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[82]  D. Harrington,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of movement , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[83]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[84]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Parieto-frontal coding of reaching: an integrated framework , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[85]  J. Decety,et al.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[86]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Motor role of human inferior parietal lobe revealed in unilateral neglect patients , 1998, Nature.