Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer?

PURPOSE To prospectively survey women undergoing screening mammography to assess their attitudes toward and preference for the level of recall rates given the possibility that an increase in recall rates may result in earlier detection of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This HIPAA-compliant survey was performed with an institutional review board-approved protocol. Women who arrived for their routine screening mammographic examination from November 2004 to March 2005 were informed before they consented to participate. The distribution of responses for each survey question was summarized, and proportions for the entire group and different subgroups were computed. The z score statistic was used to assess significant differences between subgroups. RESULTS Fifteen hundred seventy anonymized questionnaires were collected; 1171 (75%) were from women between 40 and 59 years of age. Of 1528 respondents, 1486 (97%) believed that a false-positive result would not deter them from continuing with regular screening, and most would have been willing to be recalled more often for either a noninvasive (86% [1308 of 1519 respondents]) or an invasive (82% [1248 of 1515 respondents]) procedure if it might increase the chance of detecting a cancer (if present) earlier. Compared with respondents undergoing their initial screening mammographic examination, women who had undergone at least one prior screening examination reported that they were more likely to continue with screening if they had received a previous false-positive result (P = .02). Women younger than 60 years and those previously recalled were more willing to be called back more often for a noninvasive or, when indicated, an invasive procedure (P < .05). CONCLUSION A substantial fraction of women in this study would have preferred the inconvenience of and anxiety associated with a higher recall rate if it resulted in the possibility of detecting breast cancer earlier.

[1]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  D. Wolverton,et al.  Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography , 2003, Journal of general internal medicine.

[4]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  P. Butow,et al.  Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision‐making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side‐effects and false results , 2002, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[8]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.

[9]  S. Evans,et al.  Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Michael J Schell,et al.  Recall and detection rates in screening mammography , 2004, Cancer.

[11]  J. Elmore,et al.  Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  H. Welch,et al.  Women’s Views on Breast Cancer Risk and Screening Mammography , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  B. Littenberg,et al.  Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[15]  Gary R Cutter,et al.  Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. , 2005, Radiology.

[16]  A. Barratt,et al.  Perceived sensitivity of mammographic screening: women's views on test accuracy and financial compensation for missed cancers. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[17]  A. Mushlin,et al.  Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  T. Perneger,et al.  Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[19]  S. Feig Economic challenges in breast imaging. A survivor's guide to success. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.