Combination of different texture features for mammographic breast density classification

Mammographic breast density refers to the prevalence of fibroglandular tissue as it appears on a mammogram. Breast density is not only an important risk for developing breast cancer but can also mask abnormalities. Breast density information can be used for planning individualized screening and treatment. In this work, statistical distributions of different texture descriptors and their combination are investigated with Support Vector Machines (SVMs) for objective breast density classification: Scale Invariant Feature Transforms (SIFT), Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and texton histograms. SIFT is an approach for detecting and extracting local feature descriptors that are reasonably invariant to changes in illumination, image noise, rotation, scaling and small changes in viewpoint. The SIFT descriptor is a coarse descriptor of the edges found in the keypoints. LBPs provide a robust and computationally simple way for describing pure local binary patterns in a texture. They provide information regarding the prevalence of different edge patterns and uniformity. Textons are defined under the operational definition of clustered filter responses and provide a statistical and structural unifying approach for texture characterization. The breast density classification accuracy of the SVM classifiers modeled on the histograms of the three different sets of texture features separately and their combination is evaluated on the Medical Image Analysis Society (MIAS) mammographic database and the results are presented. The combination of the statistical distributions of all the different texture features allows for the highest classification accuracy, reaching over 93%.

[1]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Classification of breast tissue by texture analysis , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[3]  Monica Morrow,et al.  Impact of Breast Density on the Presenting Features of Malignancy , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  Patrick Haffner,et al.  Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[5]  Ian W. Ricketts,et al.  The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database , 1994 .

[6]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Jennifer A. Harvey,et al.  Breast Density into Clinical Practice , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[9]  MalikJitendra,et al.  Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials using Three-dimensional Textons , 2001 .

[10]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.

[11]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Robust Breast Composition Measurement - VolparaTM , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[12]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Reyer Zwiggelaar,et al.  Background texture extraction for the classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns , 2001 .

[14]  David Haussler,et al.  Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory , 1992, COLT 1992.

[15]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Automatic breast density segmentation: an integration of different approaches , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  The mammogram that cried Wolfe. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Classifying Images of Materials: Achieving Viewpoint and Illumination Independence , 2002, ECCV.

[18]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[19]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Arnau Oliver,et al.  Modeling and Classifying Breast Tissue Density in Mammograms , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[21]  Mislav Grgic,et al.  Feature selection for automatic breast density classification , 2010, Proceedings ELMAR-2010.

[22]  Paolo Peterlongo,et al.  Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  Reyer Zwiggelaar,et al.  Mammographic Segmentation and Risk Classification Using a Novel Binary Model Based Bayes Classifier , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[25]  B. Keller,et al.  Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[26]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[28]  M. Brady,et al.  Automatic classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns: a statistical approach , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[29]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[30]  N. Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[32]  Robert Marti,et al.  A Novel Breast Tissue Density Classification Methodology , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[33]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Fabio A. González,et al.  Histopathology Image Classification Using Bag of Features and Kernel Functions , 2009, AIME.