Spatial Attention to Social Cues is not a Monolithic Process

Social stimuli are a highly salient source of information, and seem to possess unique qualities that set them apart from other well-known categories. One characteristic is their ability to elicit spatial orienting, whereby directional stimuli like eyegaze and pointing gestures act as exogenous cues that trigger automatic shifts of attention that are difficult to inhibit. This effect has been extended to non-social stimuli, like arrows, leading to some uncertainty regarding whether spatial orienting is specialized for social cues. Using a standard spatial cueing paradigm, we found evidence that both a pointing hand and arrow are effective cues, but that the hand is encoded more quickly, leading to overall faster responses. We then extended the paradigm to include multiple cues in order to evaluate congruent vs. incongruent cues. Our results indicate that faster encoding of the social cue leads to downstream effects on the allocation of attention resulting in faster orienting.

[1]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[2]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  M. Bindemann,et al.  Gaze perception requires focused attention: evidence from an interference task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Anna S. Law,et al.  Attention capture by faces , 2008, Cognition.

[6]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Graph-Based Visual Saliency , 2006, NIPS.

[8]  Mark A Frye,et al.  The eyes have it , 2017, Nature Physics.

[9]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  At first sight: A high-level pop out effect for faces , 2005, Vision Research.

[11]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Eye contact detection in humans from birth , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting , 1999 .

[14]  S. Tipper,et al.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  S. Aglioti,et al.  Reflexive social attention is mapped according to effector-specific reference systems , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  V. Bruce,et al.  Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Brain Responses to Biological Relevance , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Gaze selection in complex social scenes , 2008 .

[19]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Human Social Attention , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Gustav Kuhn,et al.  The influence of eye-gaze and arrow pointing distractor cues on voluntary eye movements , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  V. Bruce,et al.  Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others , 1999 .

[22]  J. Tipples Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  My eyes want to look where your eyes are looking: Exploring the tendency to imitate another individual's gaze , 2002, Neuroreport.

[24]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.