The effect of supplements of fishmeal and lactic acid on voluntary intake of silage by calves

In order to assess the relative effects of protein content and acid on intake, grass silage was given ad libitum to twelve entire male calves, initially 4 months of age and 117 kg liveweight (LW), either alone or supplemented with fishmeal at 50 g dry matter (DM) per kg silage DM. These two diets were offered alone or with additions of lactic acid at 50 g per kg silage DM in a partial changeover design in which lactic acid levels only were reversed between two 28-d measurement periods. In the absence of lactic acid, fishmeal significantly increased absolute intake but not intake relative to LW. There was a significant interaction between treatments in that the addition of lactic acid depressed DM intake in the absence of fishmeal (23·9 vs 21·1 g kg-1 LW) but not in its presence (23·2 vs 23·1 g kg-1 LW). Addition of fishmeal increased the digestibility of DM from a mean of 0·708 to 0·744 (P < 0·05), of gross energy from 0·646 to 0·694 (P < 0·01) and of N from 0·422 to 0·592 (P < 0·001) but had no significant effect on the digestibility of cellulose (0·766 vs 0·788 for treatments without and with fishmeal respectively). Lactic acid addition had no effect on the digestibility of plant components and, further, interaction effects between treatments were not significant. Supplementation with fishmeal reduced the total time spent eating and ruminating (Ro value) from a mean of 284 to 240 min kg-1 DM (P < 0·01) and increased urine pH from 8·34 to 8·50. Lactic acid influenced neither Ro value nor urine pH and the interaction effect did not reach significance for these two parameters. The results indicate that the addition of fishmeal can overcome a depressant effect of lactic acid on intake and it is suggested that the responses to treatment were mediated via changes in the ratio of energy to protein supply rather than as a result of treatment effects on digestive efficiency or acid-base balance.

[1]  A. Egan Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. VIII.* Relationships between voluntary intake of herbage by sheep and the protein/energy ratio in the digestion products , 1977 .

[2]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Factors affecting the nutritive value of silage , 1976 .

[3]  R. J. Wilkins 7 – The Nutritive Value of Silages , 1974 .

[4]  C. H. Gordon,et al.  Formaldehyde and Formic Acid as a Silage Additive , 1973 .

[5]  D. Scott Excretion of phosphorus and acid in the urine of sheep and calves fed either roughage or concentrate diets. , 1972, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[6]  R. J. Wilkins,et al.  The voluntary intake of silage by sheep:III. The effects of post-ruminal infusions of casein on the intake and nitrogen retention of sheep given silage ad libitum , 1971, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[7]  W. F. Raymond,et al.  The voluntary intake by sheep and cattle of silages differing in free-acid content , 1970, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[8]  T. Forbes,et al.  SILAGE FOR WINTER FATTENING , 1970 .

[9]  P. Mcdonald,et al.  Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene , 1961 .

[10]  H. Perry,et al.  Composition of buchu leaf oil , 1961 .

[11]  Q. Gibson,et al.  The estimation of lactic acid using ceric sulphate. , 1954, The Biochemical journal.

[12]  E. W. Crampton,et al.  The Relation of Cellulose and Lignin Content to the Nutritive Value of Animal Feeds , 1938 .