Optical confinement methods for continued scaling of CMOS image sensor pixels.

The pixels that make up CMOS image sensors have steadily decreased in size over the last decade. This scaling has two effects: first, the amount of light incident on each pixel decreases, making optical efficiency, i.e., the collection of each photon, more important. Second, diffraction comes into play when pixel size approaches the wavelength of visible light, resulting in increased spatial optical crosstalk. To address these two effects, we investigate and compare three methods for guiding incident light from the microlens down to the photodiode. Two of these techniques rely on total internal reflection (TIR) at the boundary between dielectric media of different refractive indices, while the third uses reflection at a metal-dielectric interface to confine the light. Simulations are performed using a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method on a realistic 1.75-mum pixel model for on-axis as well as angled incidence. We evaluate the optical efficiency and spatial crosstalk performance of these methods compared to a reference pixel and find significant (10%) improvement for the TIR designs with properly chosen parameters and nearly full spatial crosstalk elimination using metal to confine the light. We also show that these improvements are comparable to those achieved by thinning the image sensor stack.

[1]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Roadmap for CMOS image sensors: Moore meets Planck and Sommerfeld , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Flavien Hirigoyen,et al.  Uniform illumination and rigorous electromagnetic simulations applied to CMOS image sensors. , 2007, Optics express.

[3]  A. Thetford,et al.  An experiment to measure frustrated total internal reflection , 1982 .

[4]  C.S. Wang,et al.  A high-efficiency CMOS image sensor with air gap in situ MicroLens (AGML) fabricated by 0.18-/spl mu/m CMOS technology , 2005, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[5]  Peter B. Catrysse,et al.  QE reduction due to pixel vignetting in CMOS image sensors , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Che-Ping Lin,et al.  Hexagonal microlens array modeling and fabrication using a thermal reflow process , 2003 .

[7]  R. Tsai,et al.  Crosstalk and microlens study in a color CMOS image sensor , 2003 .

[8]  Hanben Niu,et al.  Soft-lithography-enabled fabrication of large numerical aperture refractive microlens array in hybrid SiO2–TiO2 sol-gel glass , 2005 .

[9]  S C Esener,et al.  Characterization of a polymer microlens fabricated by use of the hydrophobic effect. , 2000, Optics letters.

[10]  Wan-Gyu Lee,et al.  Comparison of Optical Properties in Al- and Cu-BEOL of CMOS Image Sensor Devices , 2006 .

[11]  Feng Xiao,et al.  Psychophysical thresholds and digital camera sensitivity: the thousand-photon limit , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Brian A Wandell,et al.  Optical efficiency of image sensor pixels. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  M. Majewski,et al.  Optical properties of metallic films for vertical-cavity optoelectronic devices. , 1998, Applied optics.

[14]  C.S. Lin,et al.  Light guide for pixel crosstalk improvement in deep submicron CMOS image sensor , 2004, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[15]  Brian A Wandell,et al.  Integrated color pixels in 0.18-microm complementary metal oxide semiconductor technology. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.