Theoretical and Practical Implications from the Use of Structuration Theory in Public Sector is Research

To gain better understanding of the development, implementation and use of information technology (IT), many scholars in the field of information systems (IS) use structuration theory (ST). However, ST is, so far, more seldom applied to, and reflected upon, in studies of public sector IS to account for (unexpected) outcomes of IT development and implementation. This paper creates an overview of the use of ST in studies on public sector IT in order to identify theoretical and practical implications for the digital public sector. Most (ten out of twelve) papers in this field apply ST to empirical studies, while three papers were found to adapt ST to fit public sector settings, and none were found to critically address ST. While ST as a lens for studying public sector IT was thus seen to have practical usefulness, theoretical usefulness is still underdeveloped regarding theory adaption and contextualization. Based on this study we argue that there is a need to further investigate the risks associated with the transfer to the public sector as it is important to achieve conscious adaptation and use of ST in public sector IS in order to progress with using ST in that context.

[1]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[2]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[3]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[4]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[6]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Structuration Theory in Information Systems Research: Methods and Controversies , 2004 .

[7]  Qing Hu,et al.  E-Government Research: A Review via the Lens of Structuration Theory , 2005, PACIS.

[8]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[9]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Structurational analysis of e-government initiatives: a case study of SCO , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Zahid Parvez,et al.  Examining e-democracy through a double structuration loop , 2006, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[11]  Junghoon Moon,et al.  Impacts of organizational assimilation of e-government systems on business value creation: A structuration theory approach , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[12]  Mark Thompson,et al.  People, practice, and technology: Restoring Giddens' broader philosophy to the study of information systems , 2012, Inf. Organ..

[13]  Christos Douligeris,et al.  Bridging theory and practice in e-government: A set of guidelines for architectural design , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[15]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Challenges in Conducting Empirical Work Using Structuration Theory: Learning from IT Research , 2005 .

[16]  Zahid Parvez,et al.  Informatization of local democracy: A structuration perspective , 2006, Inf. Polity.

[17]  Jim Costello,et al.  Structuration theory and the use of XML for web site content management in government: Comprehensive prototyping as an induced change episode , 2007, ASIST.

[18]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Towards an Understanding of E-Government Induced Change - Drawing on Organization and Structuration Theories , 2010, EGOV.

[19]  Jeremy Rose Evaluating the contribution of structuration theory to the IS discipline , 1998, ECIS.

[20]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Response to Jones and Karsten, Giddens's structuration theory and information systems research , 2009 .

[21]  Zorlu Senyucel,et al.  Assessing the impact of e‐government on providers and users of the IS function , 2007 .

[22]  Helena Karsten,et al.  Divided by a common language? a response to Marshall Scott Poole , 2009 .

[23]  W. Orlikowski The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[24]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[25]  Zorlu Senyucel,et al.  Zorlu Senyucel Business Information and technology Research Group The Impact of the IS Function on the Transition of e-Government Services in Welsh Unitary Councils. WP02/13 , 2003 .

[26]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[28]  Nicky Gregson,et al.  Social theory of modern societies: On the (ir)relevance of structuration theory to empirical research , 1989 .

[29]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[30]  Gabriel Puron-Cid,et al.  Interdisciplinary Application of Structuration Theory for E-Government: A Case Study of an IT-Enabled Budget Reform , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  Hee-Woong Kim,et al.  Structural Analysis of e-Government in India , 2010 .

[32]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[33]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[34]  F. K. Boersma,et al.  Giddens à la Carte? Appraising empirical applications of Structuration Theory in management and organization studies , 2012 .

[35]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Michael Magill THE DUALITY OF THE PRICE AND TECHNOLOGY SETS , 1974 .

[37]  C. Pollitt Mainstreaming Technological Change in the Study of Public Management , 2010 .