Assessing homogeneity of land surface air temperature observations using sparse‐input reanalyses

State‐of‐the‐art homogenisation approaches for any test site rely upon the availability of a sufficient number of neighbouring sites with similar climatic conditions and a sufficient quantity of overlapping measurements. These conditions are not always met, particularly in poorly sampled regions and epochs. Modern sparse‐input reanalysis products which are constrained by observed sea surface temperatures, sea‐ice and surface pressure observations, continue to improve, offering independently produced surface temperature estimates back to the early 19th century. This study undertakes an exploratory analysis on the applicability of sparse‐input reanalysis to identify breakpoints in available basic station data. Adjustments are then applied using a variety of reanalysis and neighbour‐based approaches to produce four distinct estimates. The methodological independence of the approach may offer valuable insights into historical data quality issues. The resulting estimates are compared to Global Historical Climatology Network version 4 (GHCNMv4) at various aggregations. Comparisons are also made with five existing global land surface monthly time series. We find a lower rate of long‐term warming which principally arises in differences in estimated behaviour prior to the early 20th century. Differences depend upon the exact pair of estimates, varying between 15 and 40% for changes from 1850–1900 to 2005–2014. Differences are much smaller for metrics starting after 1900 and negligible after 1950. Initial efforts at quantifying parametric uncertainty suggest this would be substantial and may lead to overlap between these new estimates and existing estimates. Further work would be required to use these data products in an operational context. This would include better understanding the reasons for apparent early period divergence including the impact of spatial infilling choices, quantification of parametric uncertainty, and a means to update the product post‐2015 when the NOAA‐CIRES‐DOE 20CRv3 sparse input reanalysis product, upon which they are based, presently ceases.

[1]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[2]  Linden Ashcroft,et al.  A historical climate dataset for southwestern Australia, 1830–1875 , 2021, International Journal of Climatology.

[3]  J. Kennedy,et al.  An Updated Assessment of Near‐Surface Temperature Change From 1850: The HadCRUT5 Data Set , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[4]  D. Lister,et al.  Land Surface Air Temperature Variations Across the Globe Updated to 2019: The CRUTEM5 Data Set , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[5]  Thomas A. Cram,et al.  An Evaluation of the Performance of the Twentieth Century Reanalysis Version 3 , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[6]  L. Haimberger,et al.  Assessing potential of sparse‐input reanalyses for centennial‐scale land surface air temperature homogenisation , 2020, International Journal of Climatology.

[7]  Bin Wang,et al.  A global-scale multidecadal variability driven by Atlantic multidecadal oscillation , 2019, National science review.

[8]  P. Jones,et al.  Unlocking Pre-1850 Instrumental Meteorological Records: A Global Inventory , 2019, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[9]  Holly A. Titchner,et al.  Towards a more reliable historical reanalysis: Improvements for version 3 of the Twentieth Century Reanalysis system , 2019, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[10]  Nathan Lenssen,et al.  Improvements in the GISTEMP Uncertainty Model , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[11]  Claude N. Williams,et al.  The Global Historical Climatology Network Monthly Temperature Dataset, Version 4 , 2018, Journal of Climate.

[12]  P. Jones,et al.  A new integrated and homogenized global monthly land surface air temperature dataset for the period since 1900 , 2018, Climate Dynamics.

[13]  Stefan Brönnimann,et al.  Identifying, attributing, and overcoming common data quality issues of manned station observations , 2017 .

[14]  J. Coll,et al.  Homogenisation of temperature and precipitation time series with ACMANT3: method description and efficiency tests , 2017 .

[15]  A. Fiore,et al.  Timing and seasonality of the United States ‘warming hole’ , 2017 .

[16]  Ø. Nordli,et al.  Air temperature changes in Svalbard and the surrounding seas from 1865 to 1920 , 2016 .

[17]  K. Cowtan,et al.  Evaluating the impact of U.S. Historical Climatology Network homogenization using the U.S. Climate Reference Network , 2016 .

[18]  S. Brönnimann Climatic Changes Since 1700 , 2015 .

[19]  Ed Hawkins,et al.  An event-based approach to understanding decadal fluctuations in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[20]  Jared Rennie,et al.  The international surface temperature initiative global land surface databank: monthly temperature data release description and methods , 2014 .

[21]  J. Rennie,et al.  Responding to the Need for Better Global Temperature Data , 2013 .

[22]  P. Jones,et al.  Independent confirmation of global land warming without the use of station temperatures , 2013 .

[23]  Leopold Haimberger,et al.  Homogenization of the Global Radiosonde Temperature Dataset through Combined Comparison with Reanalysis Background Series and Neighboring Stations , 2012 .

[24]  Peter W. Thorne,et al.  Benchmarking the performance of pairwise homogenization of surface temperatures in the United States , 2012 .

[25]  Peter Domonkos,et al.  Benchmarking homogenization algorithms for monthly data , 2012 .

[26]  Uang,et al.  The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis , 2010 .

[27]  Blair Trewin,et al.  Exposure, instrumentation, and observing practice effects on land temperature measurements , 2010 .

[28]  Claude N. Williams,et al.  Homogenization of Temperature Series via Pairwise Comparisons , 2009 .

[29]  P. Jones,et al.  The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project , 2009 .

[30]  D. Nychka,et al.  Consistency of modelled and observed temperature trends in the tropical troposphere , 2008 .

[31]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Can CGCMs Simulate the Twentieth-Century “Warming Hole” in the Central United States? , 2006 .

[32]  Adam A. Scaife,et al.  Climate impacts of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation , 2006 .

[33]  R. Arritt,et al.  Altered hydrologic feedback in a warming climate introduces a “warming hole” , 2004 .

[34]  Henri Caussinus,et al.  Detection and correction of artificial shifts in climate series , 2004 .

[35]  Lucie A. Vincent,et al.  A Technique for the Identification of Inhomogeneities in Canadian Temperature Series , 1998 .

[36]  Thomas C. Peterson,et al.  Creation of homogeneous composite climatological reference series , 1994 .

[37]  David R. Easterling,et al.  Effects of Recent Thermometer Changes in the Cooperative Station Network , 1991 .

[38]  Boris Katz,et al.  Recent Changes Implemented into the Global Forecast System at NMC , 1991 .

[39]  Claude N. Williams,et al.  An Approach to Adjusting Climatological Time Series for Discontinuous Inhomogeneities , 1987 .

[40]  Guiling Wang,et al.  Climate Impacts , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[41]  Arthur H. Rosenfeld,et al.  A New Estimate of the AverageEarth Surface Land TemperatureSpanning 1753 to 2011 , 2013 .

[42]  N. Guttman Homogeneity, Data Adjustments and Climatic Normals , 1998 .

[43]  Anders Moberg,et al.  HOMOGENIZATION OF SWEDISH TEMPERATURE DATA. PART I: HOMOGENEITY TEST FOR LINEAR TRENDS , 1997 .

[44]  Geoinformatics & Geostatistics: An Overview A New Estimate of the Average Earth Surface Land Temperature Spanning 1753 to 2011 , 2022 .