When Success Isn’t Everything – Case Studies of Two Virtual Teams

Researchers have been attempting to identify the factors that contribute to virtual team success. Two virtual teams were studied over six-months using an interpretive approach and qualitative data collection techniques. The outcomes of these teams were outwardly very poor. Yet, team members considered themselves successful in relation to the circumstances in which they found themselves. The team members identified the factors they believed contributed to the outcomes and the rationale for why they were successful despite the outward appearances. The interpretive approach allowed for an exploration of the circumstances, and how these perspectives were derived. The cases indicate that working in distributed mode can be problematic if teamwork issues are not addressed, and a technological focus adopted.

[1]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[2]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[4]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Designing Effective Work Groups. , 1988 .

[5]  James A. Senn,et al.  Expanding the Reach of Electronic Commerce: The Internet EDI Alternative , 1998, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[6]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[7]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[8]  Kregg Aytes,et al.  Media effects on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer-supported workgroups - An analysis of results from two longitudinal studies , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[9]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[10]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Impact of User Satisfaction and Trust on Virtual Team Members , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[12]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Adaptiveness in Virtual Teams: Organisational Challenges and Research Directions , 2001 .

[13]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[14]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  S. R. Hiltz The Network Nation , 1978 .

[16]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. , 2002 .

[17]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing a virtual workplace , 2000 .

[18]  P. Goodman Designing effective work groups , 1999 .

[19]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[20]  Robert J. McQueen,et al.  Asynchronous Groupware Support Effects on Process Improvement Groups: An Action Research Study , 1996, ICIS.

[21]  S LeeAllen,et al.  Communication richness in electronic mail , 1997 .

[22]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[23]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The importance of facilitator role behaviors in different face to face group support systems environments , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  Ian Gorton,et al.  Issues in co-operative software engineering using globally distributed teams , 1996, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[25]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Globalwork : bridging distance, culture, and time , 1994 .

[26]  Jim Suchan,et al.  The communication characteristics of virtual teams: a case study , 2001 .

[27]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills , 1975 .

[28]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  The effects of electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: An assessment of the empirical research , 1990 .

[29]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[30]  C. Handy Trust and the virtual organization , 1999 .

[31]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Introduction to social psychology: A European perspective , 1988 .

[32]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[34]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use , 2000, MIS Q..

[35]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  P. Goodman Groups That Work (and Those That Don't)Groups That Work (and Those That Don't) by Hackman Richard. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991, 512 pp. , 1992 .

[37]  T.M.A. Bemelmans,et al.  Group Support Systems and Virtual Collaboration: The HKNET Project , 2002 .

[38]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Distributed Group Support Systems , 1993, MIS Q..

[40]  Peggy M. Beranek,et al.  The impacts of relational and trust development training on virtual teams: an exploratory investigation , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[41]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  How a silver bullet may lose its shine , 2003, CACM.

[42]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[43]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels , 2001, Internet Res..

[44]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Electronic messaging and communication effectiveness in an ongoing work group , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[45]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus , 2001, MIS Q..

[46]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading groups in organizations , 1986 .

[47]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Communities of Practice: Going Virtual , 2001, ArXiv.

[48]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[49]  Colin Eden,et al.  On evaluating the performance of 'wide-band' GDSS's , 1995 .

[50]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing Group Data in MIS Research: Including the Effect of the Group , 2001 .

[51]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Neural networks: applications in industry, business and science , 1994, CACM.

[52]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Theorizing about group support systems , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[53]  Andrew May,et al.  A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry , 2001 .

[54]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[55]  Kregg Aytes,et al.  Do Some Things Change Faster than Others? The Dynamics of Behavioral Change in Computer-Supported Groups , 2002 .

[56]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[57]  Martha Haywood,et al.  Managing virtual teams : practical techniques for high-technology project managers , 1998 .

[58]  J. McGrath Groups interacting with technology: the complex and dynamic fit of group, task, technology, and time , 1992, CSCW '92.

[59]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[60]  Wanda J. Orlikowski Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation , 1993, Inf. Soc..

[61]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[62]  David E. Sutton Is Anybody Out There ? , 1991 .

[63]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[64]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[66]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[67]  Allen S. Lee Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[68]  AlaviMaryam,et al.  Media and group cohesion , 2001 .

[69]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[70]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[71]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..