Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Biomarkers Dynamically Predict Treatment Response and Survival In Gynecologic Cancers

Background High-grade serous ovarian and endometrial cancers are the most lethal female reproductive tract malignancies worldwide. In part, failure to treat these two aggressive cancers successfully centers on the fact that while the majority of patients are diagnosed based on current surveillance strategies as having a complete clinical response to their primary therapy, nearly half will develop disease recurrence within 18 months and the majority will die from disease recurrence within 5 years. Moreover, no currently used biomarkers or imaging studies can predict outcome following initial treatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a theoretically powerful biomarker for detecting otherwise occult disease. We therefore explored the use of personalized ctDNA markers as both a surveillance and prognostic biomarker in gynecologic cancers and compared this to current FDA-approved surveillance tools. Methods and Findings Tumor and serum samples were collected at time of surgery and then throughout treatment course for 44 patients with gynecologic cancers, representing 22 ovarian cancer cases, 17 uterine cancer cases, one peritoneal, three fallopian tube, and one patient with synchronous fallopian tube and uterine cancer. Patient/tumor-specific mutations were identified using whole-exome and targeted gene sequencing and ctDNA levels quantified using droplet digital PCR. CtDNA was detected in 93.8% of patients for whom probes were designed and levels were highly correlated with CA-125 serum and computed tomography (CT) scanning results. In six patients, ctDNA detected the presence of cancer even when CT scanning was negative and, on average, had a predictive lead time of seven months over CT imaging. Most notably, undetectable levels of ctDNA at six months following initial treatment was associated with markedly improved progression free and overall survival. Conclusions Detection of residual disease in gynecologic, and indeed all cancers, represents a diagnostic dilemma and a potential critical inflection point in precision medicine. This study suggests that the use of personalized ctDNA biomarkers in gynecologic cancers can identify the presence of residual tumor while also more dynamically predicting response to treatment relative to currently used serum and imaging studies. Of particular interest, ctDNA was an independent predictor of survival in patients with ovarian and endometrial cancers. Earlier recognition of disease persistence and/or recurrence and the ability to stratify into better and worse outcome groups through ctDNA surveillance may open the window for improved survival and quality and life in these cancers.

[1]  N. Rosenfeld,et al.  Noninvasive Identification and Monitoring of Cancer Mutations by Targeted Deep Sequencing of Plasma DNA , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[2]  G. Rustin,et al.  Role of tumour markers in monitoring epithelial ovarian cancer , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  Jorge S. Reis-Filho,et al.  Mutation tracking in circulating tumor DNA predicts relapse in early breast cancer , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[4]  J. Gohagan,et al.  Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[5]  Bert Vogelstein,et al.  DETECTION OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN EARLY AND LATE STAGE HUMAN MALIGNANCIES , 2014 .

[6]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  H. Shah,et al.  Personalized ovarian cancer disease surveillance and detection of candidate therapeutic drug target in circulating tumor DNA. , 2014, Neoplasia.

[8]  R. Manfredi,et al.  Which imaging technique should we use in the follow up of gynaecological cancer? , 2014, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[9]  Kendra Johnson,et al.  Integration of and adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) in a Community Cancer Center , 2015 .

[10]  G. Ricolleau,et al.  CA 125 half-life and CA 125 nadir during induction chemotherapy are independent predictors of epithelial ovarian cancer outcome: results of a French multicentric study. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  H. Nielsen,et al.  Analysis of circulating tumour DNA to monitor disease burden following colorectal cancer surgery , 2015, Gut.

[12]  R. Bast CA 125 and the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer , 2010, Cancer.

[13]  Rochelle L. Garcia,et al.  Tumor-specific p53 sequences in blood and peritoneal fluid of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  Lori J Sokoll,et al.  Assessment of plasma DNA levels, allelic imbalance, and CA 125 as diagnostic tests for cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  Y. Doki,et al.  Monitoring gastric cancer progression with circulating tumour DNA , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  P. Disaia,et al.  Clinical Gynecologic Oncology , 1981 .

[17]  R. Mannel,et al.  The Adnexal Mass , 2012 .

[18]  A. Sood,et al.  Quantification of Total Plasma Cell‐Free DNA in Ovarian Cancer Using Real‐Time PCR , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Circulating tumor DNA outperforms circulating tumor cells for KRAS mutation detection in thoracic malignancies. , 2015, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  R. Kryscio,et al.  Preoperative differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors: the efficacy of morphology indexing and Doppler flow sonography. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[21]  D. Brizel,et al.  National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology , 2012 .