Automated electrophysiologic hearing testing using a threshold-seeking algorithm.

The efficacy of utilizing an automated algorithm to identify auditory brainstem responses (ABR) was studied. A microcomputer-based threshold-seeking algorithm utilizing click-evoked ABR was developed to determine evoked-response thresholds for automated hearing screening. The software consists of an evoked-response recognizer unit, which determines the presence or absence of a response, and a threshold-tracking unit, which controls the click intensity in order to track the threshold. The response recognizer is based upon correlation methods. Threshold tracking is accomplished using a Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST) procedure, which is commonly used to study psychophysical properties of the auditory system. Sound level is automatically adjusted, based on the results of the recognizer and the threshold tracker. Test results were generally obtained in less than 15 minutes per ear. The results of the automated procedure correlate very highly with expert judgments of ABR threshold and show good test-retest reliability, suggesting that automated procedures are viable alternatives to traditional testing methods.

[1]  D W Worthington,et al.  Some Comparisons between Auditory Brain Stem Response Thresholds, Latencies, and the Pure‐Tone Audiogram , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[2]  C Elberling,et al.  Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  Erratum and Note: PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41, 782–787 (1967)] , 1967 .

[4]  O. Ozdamar,et al.  A backpropagation network for classifying auditory brainstem evoked potentials: input level biasing, temporal and spectral inputs and learning patterns , 1989, International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[5]  B A Weber,et al.  A Computerized Scoring Procedure for Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry , 1980, Ear and hearing.

[6]  J. Widen,et al.  Behavioral Screening of High-Risk Infants Using Visual Reinforcement Audiometry , 1990 .

[7]  O. Ozdamar,et al.  Automated ABR Peak Labelling Using Matched Filters , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  R A Dobie,et al.  Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[9]  D. Kennedy,et al.  Identification of Hearing Impairment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Population: Outcome of a Five-Year Project at The Johns Hopkins Hospital , 1990 .

[10]  S S Saunders,et al.  Evoked potentials: computer-automated threshold-tracking procedure using an objective detection criterion. , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[11]  R. D. Ray,et al.  Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II , 1985 .

[12]  J. Jerger,et al.  Prediction of sensorineural hearing level from the brain stem evoked response. , 1978, Archives of otolaryngology.

[13]  A. Thornton,et al.  Auditory response detection method and apparatus , 1981 .

[14]  S M Mason,et al.  On-line computer scoring of the auditory brainstem response for estimation of hearing threshold. , 1984, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[15]  R A Zappulla,et al.  Response threshold determination of the brain stem auditory evoked response: a comparison of the phase versus magnitude derived from the fast Fourier transform. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[16]  Edward Miskiel,et al.  On-line system for automated auditory evoked response threshold determination , 1988, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[18]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[19]  B M Sayers,et al.  Fully objective ERA by phase spectral analysis. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[20]  Keith Wj,et al.  Effects of audiometric configuration on the auditory brain stem response. , 1987 .

[21]  P. Kileny.  ALGO-1 Automated Infant Hearing Screener: Preliminary Results , 1987 .

[22]  O Ozdamar,et al.  Computer methods for on-line hearing testing with auditory brain stem responses. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[23]  Jacobson Jt,et al.  Automated and conventional ABR screening techniques in high-risk infants. , 1990 .

[24]  A. Burr Fontaine,et al.  The Detection of Auditory Evoked Responses Using a Matched Filter , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  C Elberling,et al.  Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[26]  L. Stein.  Evaluating the Efficiency of Auditory Brainstem Response as a Neonatal Hearing Screening Test , 1984 .

[27]  Özcan Özdamar,et al.  Auditory brainstem evoked potential classification for threshold detection by neural networks. I. Network design, similarities between human-expert and network classification, feasibility , 1992 .

[28]  M. Hyde,et al.  Audiometric accuracy of the click ABR in infants at risk for hearing loss. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  S. Arnold.  Objective versus Visual Detection of the Auditory Brain Stem Response , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[30]  R A Dobie,et al.  Objective Response Detection , 1993, Ear and hearing.