VertU: universal multilocus primer sets for eDNA metabarcoding of vertebrate diversity, evaluated by both artificial and natural cases

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a powerful tool for monitoring biodiversity in natural ecosystems. The accuracy of eDNA metabarcoding relies heavily on the PCR primers that amplify target sequences. For vertebrates, most available primers are designed for particular groups. There have been inadequate attempts to design “universal” primers applicable to all vertebrates. Here, we developed three new universal primer sets (V12S-U, V16S-U, and VCOI-U) targeting mitochondrial 12S, 16S, and COI genes, respectively. They work for all vertebrate groups, with amplification length of 200-250 bp, facilitating the use of short-read sequencing platforms. We evaluated and compared the species detection ability of our primer sets and seven previously published ones through both in-silico PCR and experiment tests with mock DNA and zoo eDNA. The species detection success of the new primer sets is over 90%, showing better performance than previously published primer sets. We also tested our new primers with water eDNA samples of natural environments, and detected a total of 895 vertebrate OTUs (BLAST identity ≥ 0.95), comprising 182 species, 195 genera, and 94 families. Our results indicated that utilizing multiple markers can achieve better species detection than using only a single marker, which is especially important for monitoring large biological communities like vertebrates. The new primer sets enable researchers to detect the presence of species of different vertebrate groups in one eDNA metabarcoding survey, which simplifies the workflow and reduces the cost. It has the potential to serve as an alternative/complementary tool for future eDNA metabarcoding studies targeting vertebrates.

[1]  S. Lavoué,et al.  Assessing a megadiverse but poorly known community of fishes in a tropical mangrove estuary through environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[2]  R. Meier,et al.  Network analysis with either Illumina or MinION reveals that detecting vertebrate species requires metabarcoding of iDNA from a diverse fly community , 2022, bioRxiv.

[3]  M. Gaither,et al.  Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary , 2022, PloS one.

[4]  R. Naidoo,et al.  eDNA sampled from stream networks correlates with camera trap detection rates of terrestrial mammals , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[5]  J. DiBattista,et al.  Monitoring vertebrate biodiversity of a protected coastal wetland using eDNA metabarcoding , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[6]  E. Clare,et al.  eDNAir: proof of concept that animal DNA can be collected from air sampling , 2021, PeerJ.

[7]  S. Domisch,et al.  Improving the reliability of eDNA data interpretation , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[8]  N. Sales,et al.  New 12S metabarcoding primers for enhanced Neotropical freshwater fish biodiversity assessment , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[9]  M. Bunce,et al.  Development of a 16S metabarcoding assay for the environmental DNA (eDNA) detection of aquatic reptiles across northern Australia , 2020, bioRxiv.

[10]  R. Hanner,et al.  Validating environmental DNA metabarcoding for marine fishes in diverse ecosystems using a public aquarium , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[11]  T. Schenekar,et al.  Reference databases, primer choice, and assay sensitivity for environmental metabarcoding: Lessons learnt from a re‐evaluation of an eDNA fish assessment in the Volga headwaters , 2020, River Research and Applications.

[12]  S. Goodman,et al.  Novel universal primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA surveys of marine mammals and other marine vertebrates , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[13]  Jindong Zhao,et al.  A comprehensive and comparative evaluation of primers for metabarcoding eDNA from fish , 2020, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[14]  D. Sims,et al.  Non‐specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[15]  Frédéric J. J. Chain,et al.  Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities , 2018, Evolutionary applications.

[16]  E. Harvey,et al.  Combined use of eDNA metabarcoding and video surveillance for the assessment of fish biodiversity , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  Beth Shapiro,et al.  Minimizing polymerase biases in metabarcoding. , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[18]  C. Hardy,et al.  Toward an ecoregion scale evaluation of eDNA metabarcoding primers: A case study for the freshwater fish biodiversity of the Murray–Darling Basin (Australia) , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[19]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high-diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guianese freshwater fishes. , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[20]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA: For Biodiversity Research and Monitoring , 2018 .

[21]  Antton Alberdi,et al.  Scrutinizing key steps for reliable metabarcoding of environmental samples , 2018 .

[22]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[23]  Masayuki Ushio,et al.  Demonstration of the potential of environmental DNA as a tool for the detection of avian species , 2017, bioRxiv.

[24]  J. Freeland,et al.  The importance of molecular markers and primer design when characterizing biodiversity from environmental DNA. , 2017, Genome.

[25]  Ben Nichols,et al.  Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 Vsearch: a Versatile Open Source Tool for Metagenomics , 2022 .

[26]  Masayuki Ushio,et al.  Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water , 2016, bioRxiv.

[27]  R. Geffers,et al.  Freshwater vertebrate metabarcoding on Illumina platforms using double-indexed primers of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene , 2016, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[28]  L. Weyrich,et al.  Comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and conventional fish survey methods in a river system , 2016 .

[29]  D. Serre,et al.  In silico assessment of primers for eDNA studies using PrimerTree and application to characterize the biodiversity surrounding the Cuyahoga River , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[30]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Next‐generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[31]  C. Wilson,et al.  Recognizing false positives: synthetic oligonucleotide controls for environmental DNA surveillance , 2016 .

[32]  P. Taberlet,et al.  obitools: a unix‐inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[33]  Jesse A. Port,et al.  Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[34]  M. Kondoh,et al.  MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[35]  Yiyuan Li,et al.  Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[36]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[37]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .

[38]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[40]  Björn Usadel,et al.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data , 2014, Bioinform..

[41]  Jesse A. Port,et al.  Using Environmental DNA to Census Marine Fishes in a Large Mesocosm , 2014, PloS one.

[42]  J. Geller,et al.  Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all‐taxa biotic surveys , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[43]  V. Ranwez,et al.  A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.

[44]  M. Thomas P. Gilbert,et al.  Screening mammal biodiversity using DNA from leeches , 2012, Current Biology.

[45]  C. Wiuf,et al.  Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[46]  V. I. Gusarov,et al.  New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[47]  L. Orlando,et al.  Meta‐barcoding of ‘dirt’ DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[48]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[49]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[50]  John A Darling,et al.  From molecules to management: adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments. , 2011, Environmental research.

[51]  Alain Viari,et al.  ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[52]  François Pompanon,et al.  Persistence of Environmental DNA in Freshwater Ecosystems , 2011, PloS one.

[53]  François Pompanon,et al.  An In silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[54]  J. Landry,et al.  A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[55]  P. Raven,et al.  Taxonomy: Impediment or Expedient? , 2004, Science.

[56]  R. Almond,et al.  Living Planet Report 2020 - Bending the curve of biodiversity loss , 2020 .

[57]  S. Salzberg,et al.  FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies , 2011, Bioinform..