Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Biting Deterrence: Structure-Activity Relationship of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acids

ABSTRACT In this study we evaluated the biting deterrent effects of a series of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids against Aedes aegypti (L), yellow fever mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) using the K &D bioassay module system. Saturated (C6:0 to C16:0 and C18:0) and unsaturated fatty acids (C11:1 to C14:1, C16:1, C18:1, and C18:2) showed biting deterrence index (BDI) values significantly greater than ethanol, the negative control. Among the saturated fatty acids, mid chain length acids (C10:0 to C13:0) showed higher biting deterrence than short (C6:0 to C9:0) and long chain length acids (C14:0 to C18:0), except for C8:0 and C16:0 that were more active than the other short and long chain acids. The BDI values of mid chain length acids (C10:0 to C13:0) were not significantly less than N, N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET), the positive control. Among the unsaturated fatty acids, C11:1 showed the highest activity (BDI = 1.05) and C18:2 had the lowest activity (BDI = 0.7). In C11:1, C12:1, and C14:1 BDI values were not significantly less than DEET. After the preliminary observations, residual activity bioassays were performed on C11:0, C12:0, C11:1, and C12:1 over a 24-h period. All the fatty acids (C11:0, C12:0, C11:1, and C12:1) and DEET showed significantly higher activity at all test intervals than the solvent control. At treatment and 1-h posttreatment, all fatty acids showed proportion not biting (PNB) values not significantly less than DEET. At 3-, 6-, and 12-h posttreatment, all fatty acids showed PNB values significantly greater than DEET. At 24-h posttreatment, only the PNB value for C12:0 was significantly higher than DEET. The dose-responses of C12:0 and DEET were determined at concentrations of 5–25 nmol/cm2. As in the residual activity bioassays, the PNB values for C12:0 and DEET at 25 nmol/cm2 were not significantly different. However, at lower concentrations, the PNB values for C12:0 were significantly greater than DEET. These results clearly indicate that mid chain length fatty acids not only have levels of biting deterrence similar to DEET at 25 nmol/cm2 in our test system, but also appeared to be more persistent than DEET. In contrast, in vivo cloth patch assay system showed that the mid-chain length fatty acids, C11:0, C11:1 C12:0, and C12:1 had minimum effective dose (MED) values greater than DEET against Ae. aegypti and their relative repellency varied according to species tested. The MED values of 120 (C11:0), 145 (C12:0) and 116 (C11:1) nmol/cm2 against Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say, indicated that these acids were not as potent as DEET with a MED of 54 nmol/cm2. The MED ratio of the C11:0 and C11:1 for all three mosquito species indicated the C11 saturated and unsaturated acids as more repellent than their corresponding C12:0 and C12:1 homologues.

[1]  M. Perich,et al.  Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review. , 1991, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[2]  J. Klun,et al.  Isolation and identification of mosquito (Aedes aegypti ) biting deterrent fatty acids from male inflorescences of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg). , 2012, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[3]  D. Strickman,et al.  Comparative Resistance of Anopheles albimanus and Aedes aegypti to N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (Deet) and 2-Methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexen-1-carboxamide (AI3-37220) in Laboratory Human-Volunteer Repellent Assays , 2004, Journal of medical entomology.

[4]  B. Knols,et al.  DEET microencapsulation: a slow-release formulation enhancing the residual efficacy of bed nets against malaria vectors. , 2008, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[5]  V. G. Dethier,et al.  The Designation of Chemicals in Terms of the Responses They Elicit from Insects , 1960 .

[6]  H. Maibach,et al.  Human skin-surface lipid fatty acids — Mosquito repellents , 2005, Experientia.

[7]  C. Schreck,et al.  AN AIRFLOW APPARATUS FOR SELECTING FEMALE MOSQUITOES FOR USE IN REPELLENT AND ATTRACTION STUDIES , 1981 .

[8]  M. Mulla,et al.  Ovipositional Repellency of Fatty Acids and Their Derivatives Against Culex and Aedes Mosquitoes , 1982 .

[9]  C. Tice,et al.  Selecting the right compounds for screening: does Lipinski's Rule of 5 for pharmaceuticals apply to agrochemicals? , 2001, Pest management science.

[10]  Svetoslav H. Slavov,et al.  Novel Carboxamides as Potential Mosquito Repellents , 2010, Journal of medical entomology.

[11]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .

[12]  N. H. Fischer,et al.  Antimycobacterial Plant Terpenoids , 2001, Planta medica.

[13]  Ulrich R. Bernier,et al.  Departments of Defense and Agriculture Team Up to Develop New Insecticides for Mosquito Control , 2010 .

[14]  J. Klun,et al.  A Quantitative In Vitro Assay for Chemical Mosquito-Deterrent Activity without Human Blood Cells1 , 2008, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[15]  W. King.  Chemicals evaluated as Insecticides and Repellents at Orlando, Fla. , 1954 .

[16]  I. Khan,et al.  Identification of Mosquito Biting Deterrent Constituents from the Indian Folk Remedy Plant Jatropha curcas , 2011, Journal of medical entomology.

[17]  J. Klun,et al.  A NEW IN VITRO BIOASSAY SYSTEM FOR DISCOVERY OF NOVEL HUMAN-USE MOSQUITO REPELLENTS1 , 2005, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[18]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[19]  M. Geier,et al.  Contribution of fatty acids to olfactory host finding of female Aedes aegypti. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[20]  Kumudini M. Meepagala,et al.  Structure–Activity Relationships of 33 Piperidines as Toxicants Against Female Adults of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) , 2007, Journal of medical entomology.