The Changing Landscape of Regulatory Control of Biological Medicines

This paper focuses on the rapid growth in biological medicines in recent years brought about by advances in molecular biology and biotechnological manufacturing techniques. It looks at the implications for regulatory bodies and research institutions concerned with quality control of biologicals; and discusses ways in which the industry/regulatory/research partnership is evolving in response to the new situation. It argues that, although change is being managed relatively successfully in some areas of regulatory control (devolution to industry, use of new technologies, international harmonization), special measures may be needed in some other areas. These include: needs of the developing world for biologicals quality control; sustaining long-term research on safety issues and test methodology; major social and ethical issues raised by new treatment and diagnostic opportunities.

[1]  Norma Morris Biological medicines in the age of biotech: public policy issues , 2003 .

[2]  S. Emerson,et al.  Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic precursors, progenitors, and stem cells: the next generation of cellular therapeutics. , 1996, Blood.

[3]  J. Abraham Science, Politics and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Controversy and Bias in Drug Regulation , 1995 .

[4]  J. Lexchin Who Needs Faster Drug Approval Times in Canada: The Public or the Industry? , 1994, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[5]  J. Abraham,et al.  Harmonising and competing for medicines regulation: how healthy are the European Union's systems of drug approval? , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[6]  J. Lexchin Drug makers and drug regulators: too close for comfort. A study of the Canadian situation. , 1990, Social Science & Medicine (1967).

[7]  J. Abraham,et al.  Secrecy and transparency of medicines licensing in the EU , 1998, The Lancet.

[8]  N. Morris Vial bodies: conflicting interests in the move to new institutional relationships in biological medicines research and regulation , 2000 .

[9]  B. Hobson,et al.  The international contribution to the standardization of biological substances. II. Biological standards and the World Health Organization 1947-1990. General considerations. , 1991, Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization.

[10]  Andrew Jamison,et al.  Changing Policy Agendas in Science and Technology , 1995 .

[11]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .