Modification of the wavelet method used in transiently evoked otoacoustic emission pass/fail criterion to increase its accuracy

Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) are widely used in newborn hearing screening programmes for early detection of hearing losses. To increase the accuracy of a TEOAE pass/fail criterion that uses the wavelet method, it was demonstrated that the large estimation variance is a possible reason for the inaccuracy, and a modified wavelet method is proposed to solve the inaccuracy problem. In the modified wavelet method, N paired buffers, instead of only one, were used to store the total 512 subaveraged responses, and then the average of the calculated N cross-correlation coefficients between N pairs of TEOAE signals was taken in the pass/fail criterion. Four sets of 256 synthesised noise and eight sets of 256 synthesised noisy TEOAE signals were tested, and each set was tested 1000 times. The results showed that the standard deviation of the correlation estimation was greatly reduced by using this average value with N selected as 4. As a result, the total number of single-scale cross-correlation coefficients below 50% decreased from 1281 to 195 for noisy TEOAE signals, and the total number of single-scale cross-correlation coefficients above 50% decreased from 90 to 0 for synthesised noise.

[1]  F Grandori,et al.  Evaluation of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns: effects of time-windowing. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[2]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D T Kemp,et al.  Acoustic emission cochleography--practical aspects. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[4]  V. Marozas,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions and improved pass/fail separation using wavelet analysis and time windowing , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  F Grandori,et al.  Optimal band pass filtering of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[6]  Truong Q. Nguyen,et al.  Wavelets and filter banks , 1996 .

[7]  G. Tognola,et al.  Wavelet analysis of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Joseph Kei,et al.  Effects of Background Noise on Click‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[9]  F Grandori,et al.  Data processing options and response scoring for OAE-based newborn hearing screening. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J T Jacobson,et al.  The effects of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening. , 1994, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[12]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Time‐Windowing of Click‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions to Increase Signal‐to‐Noise Ratio , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[13]  Peter John Bray A study of the properties of click evoked otoacoustic emissions and development of a clinical otoacoustic hearing test instrument , 1989 .

[14]  D T Kemp,et al.  A Guide to the Effective Use of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.