Self-consistent computation of x-ray mirror point spread functions from surface profile and roughness

The angular resolution degradation of an X-ray mirror, represented by its Point Spread Function (PSF), is usually simulated accounting for geometrical deformations and microroughness of its surface. When the surface profile is analyzed in terms of Fourier components, figure errors comprise the spectral regime of long spatial wavelengths, whilst microroughness falls in the regime of high spatial frequencies. The first effect is in general simulated along with geometrical optics, while the second contribution - that heavily depends on the energy of X-rays - is derived from the first order scattering theory. A drawback of this method, indeed, is that the separation between the geometrical and physical optics regime is not abrupt. Moreover, it is not clear how one should merge the PSFs derived from the two computations to retrieve an affordable reconstruction of the PSF of the mirror. In this paper we suggest a method to compute the mirror PSF from longitudinal profiles of a grazing incidence mirror, based uniquely on physical optics. The treatment makes use of Fresnel diffraction from measured/simulated profiles, accounting for the surface roughness in terms of its PSD (Power-Spectral-Density). Even though this approach was already adopted in the past to simulate the sole X-ray scattering, in this work we show, along a series of simulations, that it can be applied to reproduce the effect of scattering, aperture diffraction and figure errors as well. The computation returns the PSF at any X-ray energy, it is self-consistent and does not require setting any boundary between figure errors and roughness.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  P. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Formation of optical images by X-rays. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  R. Chase,et al.  Design Parameters of Paraboloid-Hyperboloid Telescopes for X-ray Astronomy. , 1972, Applied optics.

[4]  J. Zavada,et al.  Relationship between surface scattering and microtopographic features (A) , 1979 .

[5]  J. Flamand,et al.  EXOSAT x-ray imaging optics. , 1981, Applied optics.

[6]  James E. Harvey,et al.  Transfer Function Characterization Of Grazing Incidence Optical Systems , 1988, Optics & Photonics.

[7]  H W Schnopper,et al.  Surface correlation function analysis of high resolution scattering data from mirrored surfaces obtained using a triple-axis x-ray diffractometer. , 1988, Applied optics.

[8]  R Willingale ROSAT wide field camera mirrors. , 1988, Applied optics.

[9]  E. Church Fractal surface finish. , 1988, Applied optics.

[10]  J. Stover Optical Scattering: Measurement and Analysis , 1990 .

[11]  Martin C. Weisskopf,et al.  X-ray evidence for particulate contamination on the AXAF VETA-1 mirrors , 1993, Optics & Photonics.

[12]  Paolo Conconi,et al.  Optimization of grazing incidence mirrors and its application to surveying X-ray telescopes , 2001 .

[13]  A. Piperno,et al.  2003 , 2003, Intensive Care Medicine.

[14]  Leon P. Van Speybroeck,et al.  New method to model x-ray scattering from random rough surfaces , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[15]  Bernd Aschenbach Boundary between geometric and wave optical treatment of x-ray mirrors , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[16]  Arjan L Mieremet,et al.  Fundamental spatial resolution of an x-ray pore optic. , 2005, Applied optics.

[17]  Daniele Spiga,et al.  Analytical evaluation of the X-ray scattering contribution to imaging degradation in grazing-incidence X-ray telescopes , 2007 .