A Practice-Based Conceptual Model on Building Information Modelling (BIM) Benefits Realisation

Most of the existing research on BIM implementation and benefits realisation has departed from a technocentric perspective and instead promoted the belief that the benefits of using BIM technologies are an inevitable outcome of adoption in and of itself. Recently, scholars have acknowledged that important links between implementation practices and realisation of benefits have received little attention in the literature. There have been calls for more research taking a more detailed account of how outcomes can be achieved. Thus, by adopting a practice-based perspective as a theoretical lens, in this paper we investigate the ‘what’, ‘who’ and ‘how’ of successful BIM processes implementation. We propose a conceptual framework on the underlying conditions of successful implementation and assert that the achievement of benefits is dependent on the interaction of those three aspects. Building on qualitative data from nine construction projects from three client organisations in the UK, we show that the relationship between BIM implementation as a set of technologies and processes and performance cannot be understood without taking into account not only ‘what’ new processes exist in a BIM project and its interdependencies but also ‘who’ implements and engages with them and ‘how’ existing structures are reconfigured when enacting those practices. In alignment with recent research challenging the perceptions of BIM enactment as a linear process, our findings provide new insights into why the proclaimed benefits of BIM have not always been realised as an outcome of a ‘symbolic’ implementation of information management processes and lack of reconfiguration of existing institutions.

[1]  M. C. Georgiadou,et al.  An overview of benefits and challenges of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in UK residential projects , 2019, Construction Innovation.

[2]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[3]  Kenneth T. Sullivan,et al.  How To Measure the Benefits of BIM - A Case Study Approach , 2012 .

[4]  Stephen Jonathan Whitty,et al.  The praxis of ‘alignment seeking’ in project work , 2017 .

[5]  P. Love,et al.  The ‘how’ of benefits management for digital technology: From engineering to asset management , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[6]  Niraj Thurairajah,et al.  Ordering in disguise: digital integration in built-environment practices , 2017 .

[7]  Raja R. A. Issa,et al.  BIM's Impact on the Success Measures of Construction Projects , 2009 .

[8]  E Papadonikolaki,et al.  Organising and Managing boundaries: A structurational view of collaboration with Building Information Modelling (BIM) , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[9]  David Bryde,et al.  The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM) , 2013 .

[10]  Pauli Alin,et al.  Practitioners deconstructing and reconstructing practices when responding to the implementation of BIM , 2016 .

[11]  John Messner,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Building Information Modeling on Project Performance , 2019, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[12]  Daniel Forgues,et al.  Embedded contexts of innovation: BIM adoption and implementation for a specialty contracting SME , 2015 .

[13]  Riitta Smeds,et al.  Aligning Misaligned Systemic Innovations: Probing Inter-Firm Effects Development in Project Networks , 2013 .

[14]  Jyh-Bin Yang,et al.  Subjective benefit evaluation model for immature BIM-enabled stakeholders , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[15]  Per Svejvig,et al.  Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world , 2015 .

[16]  D. Root,et al.  Understanding BIM’s impact on professional work practices using activity theory , 2020, Construction Management and Economics.

[17]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders , 2009 .

[18]  Bethan Morgan Organizing for digitalization through mutual constitution: the case of a design firm , 2019 .

[19]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  BIM and the small construction firm: a critical perspective , 2017 .

[20]  Ruth Dowsett,et al.  Assessing the implementation of BIM – an information systems approach , 2018, Construction Management and Economics.

[21]  Michael Pitt,et al.  Towards a conceptual framework to manage BIM/COBie asset data using a standard project management methodology , 2019, Journal of Facilities Management.

[22]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  Yield-to-BIM: impacts of BIM maturity on project performance , 2017 .

[23]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[24]  David Seidl,et al.  On the risk of studying practices in isolation: Linking what, who, and how in strategy research , 2016 .

[25]  Karen Manley,et al.  The role of contractors’ building information modelling (BIM) experience in realising the potential values of BIM , 2019, International Journal of Construction Management.

[26]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  System information modelling in practice: Analysis of tender documentation quality in a mining mega-project , 2017 .

[27]  Henrik Linderoth,et al.  The role of industry: an analytical framework to understand ICT transformation within the AEC industry , 2017 .

[28]  Tuba Kocaturk,et al.  From Finnish AEC knowledge ecosystem to business ecosystem: lessons learned from the national deployment of BIM , 2018, Construction Management and Economics.

[29]  Kathrin Otrel-Cass,et al.  A holistic analysis of a BIM-mediated building design process using activity theory , 2019, Construction Management and Economics.

[30]  Sami Paavola,et al.  Beyond the BIM utopia: Approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling , 2014 .