Neoliberalism and the Institutions for Regional Development in Australia

This paper examines some effects of the pursuit of neoliberalism on regional development policy and practice in Australia, and in particular on the activities and effectiveness of regional development organisations. The paper interprets data from a survey of 505 regional development organisations across Australia through the framework of Jessop's contribution to state theory and his identification of four key trends in economic management under neoliberalism. Regional development policies are seen as a response of governments to electoral pressure from regions, but a response that is constrained by the dominance of neoliberal ideology. The objectives of regional development are predominantly economic, but are often limited to the role of facilitation and the provision of information. Some responsibility for regional development has been shifted downwards to regions, but the effectiveness of the organisations given this responsibility is reduced by the short-term and competitive nature of much of their funding, the lack of coordination between regional development actors at the local level, the proliferation of agencies and the competition between them. The paper concludes that regional development agencies in Australia are in many ways a product of neoliberalism, since they represent one way in which governments can be seen to be responding to regional pressure for assistance but they can do so without incurring significant costs. Yet regional development bodies are also a victim of neoliberalist thinking, since it denies them the resources and the powers they need to be more successful in their work.

[1]  G. Haughton,et al.  Developing locally : an international comparison of local and regional economic development , 2003 .

[2]  Andrew Beer,et al.  Global Restructuring, the Welfare State and Urban Programmes: Federal Policies and Inequality within Australian Cities , 2002 .

[3]  A. Maude,et al.  Developing Australia's Regions: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[4]  G. Macleod,et al.  Towards a Regional Renaissance? Reconfiguring and Rescaling England's Economic Governance , 1999 .

[5]  Humphrey McQueen,et al.  Changing Track: A New Political Economic Direction for Australia@@@Water's Fall: Running the Risks with Economic Rationalism , 2000 .

[6]  Mike Taylor The dynamics of Australian regional policy: Lessons for Europe? , 2000 .

[7]  G. Macleod,et al.  Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance , 1999 .

[8]  Bill Pritchard,et al.  Land of discontent: the dynamics of change in rural and regional Australia , 2000 .

[9]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Spatial Selectivity of the State? The Regulationist Enigma and Local Struggles over Economic Governance , 1997 .

[10]  M. Pusey Economic Rationalism in Canberra: A Nation-Building State Changes its Mind , 1989 .

[11]  F. Argy Australia at the Crossroads: Radical Free Market or a Progressive Liberalism? , 1999 .

[12]  Martin Jones The Rise of the Regional State in Economic Governance: ‘Partnerships for Prosperity’ Or New Scales of State Power? , 2001 .

[13]  B. Jessop State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place , 1990 .

[14]  B. Jessop Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State‐Theoretical Perspective , 2002 .

[15]  M. Tonts Some recent trends in Australian regional economic development policy , 1999 .