Usefulness of Histological Examination for the Diagnosis of Onychomycosis

Background: Direct microscopy and culture tests currently used in the diagnosis of nail mycosis can yield false-negative results, and confirmation of the pathogenic agent, especially in non-dermatophyte infections, is often a lengthy process. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the histological examination of nail clipping samples in supplementing the standard microscopic and culture techniques for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Patients and Methods: One hundred and seventy-two subjects affected by nail alterations suggestive of onychomycosis were evaluated. Nail specimens were studied with 3 different techniques: direct microscopic examination of a 40% KOH clarified preparation, fungal culture and histological examination. Patients positive for fungal infection were re-evaluated with the same techniques after treatment with oral terbinafine, fluconazole or itraconazole and topical application of bifonazole or ciclopirox for 2 months. Results: Direct microscopy was positive in 102 (59.3%) nail specimens. The culture test was positive in 90 cases (52.9%), showing a dermatophyte in 45, a yeast in 23 and a mould in 22 samples. The histological examination was positive in 94 (54.6%) samples. In 4 cases, it was the only investigation confirming the clinical diagnosis of nail mycosis. In most of the cases, the morphological aspect of the hyphae and/or spores suggested also to which group of pathogens (dermatophytes, yeasts or moulds) the mycetes observed in the histological sections could be ascribed. The concurrent presence of a dermatophyte and a mould was evidenced in a few specimens. The control histological examination at the end of the treatment showed negative results or residual non-vital hyphae and/or spores. Conclusions: Results of the present study indicate that the histological examination of nail clipping specimens is a relatively inexpensive, rapid and easily performed procedure. It is useful to confirm or refute the results of routine microscopy and culture tests. Moreover, nail histopathological observation may help in ascribing a pathogenic role of non-dermatophyte isolates and evaluating the effectiveness of antifungal treatment.

[1]  A. Ramani,et al.  MOLDS IN ONYCHOMYCOSIS , 1993, International journal of dermatology.

[2]  Barrett Rj,et al.  Biopsy of the nail area. , 1978 .

[3]  J. Marley,et al.  Non‐dermatophytes in onychomycosis of the toenails , 1997, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  G. Achten,et al.  Onychomycoses in the laboratory. , 1978, Mykosen. Supplement.

[5]  G. Piérard,et al.  Fatal hyalohyphomycosis following Fusarium onychomycosis in an immunocompromised patient. , 1996, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[6]  N. Zaias The longitudinal nail biopsy. , 1967, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[7]  B. Elewski Bacterial infection in a patient with onychomycosis. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[8]  R. Kirsner,et al.  Routine histologic examination for the diagnosis of onychomycosis: an evaluation of sensitivity and specificity. , 1998, Cutis.

[9]  M. English Nails and fungi. , 1976, The British journal of dermatology.

[10]  M. Richardson Effect of Lamisil and azole antifungals in experimental nail infection. , 1997, Dermatology.

[11]  E. Haneke Fungal infections of the nail. , 1991, Seminars in dermatology.

[12]  B. Elewski,et al.  A U.S. epidemiologic survey of superficial fungal diseases. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[13]  R. Scher Punch biopsies of nails: a simple, valuable procedure. , 1978, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[14]  E. Haneke,et al.  The scope of onychomycosis: epidemiology and clinical features , 1999, International journal of dermatology.

[15]  P. Corcuff,et al.  [Microscopic diagnosis of onychomycoses]. , 1994, Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie.

[16]  E. Rieger,et al.  Steigende Häufigkeit der Onychomykose ‐ Ändert sich das Erregerspektrum? , 1996 .

[17]  Mary P. Eenglish NAILS AND FUNGI , 1976 .

[18]  J. Marley,et al.  Significance of non-dermatophyte moulds and yeasts in onychomycosis. , 1997, Dermatology.

[19]  A. Ackerman,et al.  Subtle clues to diagnosis from biopsies of nails. The value of nail biopsy for demonstrating fungi not demonstrable by microbiologic techniques. , 1980, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[20]  E. Rieger,et al.  [Increasing frequency of onychomycoses--is there a change in the spectrum of infectious agents?]. , 1996, Mycoses.

[21]  Edgar B. Smith,et al.  Effect of onychomycosis on quality of life. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[22]  R. Summerbell,et al.  Onychomycosis: an evaluation of three sampling methods. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[23]  D. Roberts,et al.  Prevalence of dermatophyte onychomycosis in the United Kingdom: Results of an omnibus survey , 1992, The British journal of dermatology.

[24]  J. Arrese,et al.  Present and potential diagnostic techniques in onychomycosis. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[25]  M. Mcginnis,et al.  Infections caused by black fungi. , 1987, Archives of dermatology.

[26]  R. Auerbach,et al.  Histologic evaluation of nail clippings for diagnosing onychomycosis. , 1991, Archives of dermatology.

[27]  R. Summerbell Epidemiology and ecology of onychomycosis. , 1997, Dermatology.

[28]  H. C. Williams,et al.  The epidemiology of onychomycosis in Britain , 1993, The British journal of dermatology.

[29]  W. Arcese,et al.  Onychomycosis as a possible origin of disseminated Fusarium solani infection in a patient with severe aplastic anemia. , 1992, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[30]  B. Elewski Diagnostic techniques for confirming onychomycosis. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.