eHealth for Breast Cancer Survivors: Use, Feasibility and Impact of an Interactive Portal

Background MijnAVL is an interactive portal including patient education, overview of appointments, access to the electronic medical records (EMR), patient-reported outcomes, plus feedback and physical activity support. Objective With this study we aimed to evaluate the use, feasibility, and impact of MijnAVL among breast cancer survivors. Methods We included survivors currently or recently treated with curative intent, who completed questions on sociodemographics, patient activation (PAM), quality of life (SF-36), and physical activity (IPAQ). MijnAVL could be used noncommittally for four months. Log data were collected retrospectively and participants completed questions on acceptability, satisfaction, and the PAM, SF-36 and IPAQ. Results Ninety-two women (mean age 49.5 years, 59% on-treatment) participated, with a mean number of logins of 8.7. Overview of appointments (80% of participants) and access to the EMR (90%) were most frequently used and most highly valued. Average website user satisfaction was 3.8 on a 5-point scale. Although participants reported having more knowledge and experiencing more control of their situation after using MijnAVL, PAM scores did not change significantly. Three domains of the SF-36 (role functioning - emotional, mental health, and social functioning) and median vigorous physical activity improved significantly over time. The burden of MijnAVL for professionals was limited. Conclusions User experiences were positive and exposure to MijnAVL was accompanied by improvements in three quality of life domains and vigorous physical activity. Tailored features may be needed to enhance the usefulness and efficacy of MijnAVL. Research with a controlled design is needed to confirm our findings.

[1]  D. Blumenthal Launching HITECH. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Rademakers,et al.  Measuring patient activation in the Netherlands: translation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[3]  J. Hibbard,et al.  What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. , 2013, Health affairs.

[4]  D. Wantland,et al.  The Effectiveness of Web-Based vs. Non-Web-Based Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Change Outcomes , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Steve Muylle,et al.  The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[6]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[7]  H. Stuckey,et al.  Chronic Health Conditions and Internet Behavioral Interventions: A Review of Factors to Enhance User Engagement , 2011, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[8]  W. V. van Harten,et al.  An interactive portal to empower cancer survivors: a qualitative study on user expectations , 2015, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[9]  M. Tremblay,et al.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[10]  L. Batehup,et al.  Towards a personalised approach to aftercare: a review of cancer follow-up in the UK , 2011, Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice.

[11]  Erik Taal,et al.  Does the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Measure What it Intends to Measure? Validation of a Dutch Version of the eHEALS in Two Adult Populations , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  L. V. van de Poll-Franse,et al.  Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes. , 2008, Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer.

[14]  J. Perlmutter,et al.  From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Translation , 2006 .

[15]  J. L. Bender,et al.  Online communities for breast cancer survivors: a review and analysis of their characteristics and levels of use , 2013, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[16]  S. Michie,et al.  What design features are used in effective e-health interventions? A review using techniques from Critical Interpretive Synthesis. , 2012, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[17]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[18]  C. McHorney,et al.  The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.

[19]  Susan M Schneider,et al.  Nurse and physician perspectives on patients with cancer having online access to their laboratory results. , 2011, Oncology nursing forum.

[20]  J. Custers,et al.  BREATH: Web-Based Self-Management for Psychological Adjustment After Primary Breast Cancer--Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  W. V. van Harten,et al.  Development of MijnAVL, an Interactive Portal to Empower Breast and Lung Cancer Survivors: An Iterative, Multi-Stakeholder Approach , 2015, JMIR research protocols.

[22]  Katherine Treiman,et al.  Cancer Patients' Information Needs across the Cancer Care Continuum: Evidence from the Cancer Information Service , 2005, Journal of health communication.

[23]  A. Bandura Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means , 2004, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[24]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. , 2011, Health affairs.

[25]  Heikki Korvenranta,et al.  The effects of Internet or interactive computer-based patient education in the field of breast cancer: a systematic literature review. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[26]  Wim H van Harten,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Empowerment of cancer survivors through information technology : an integrative review , 2015 .

[27]  S. Wangberg,et al.  Adherence in Internet-based interventions , 2008, Patient preference and adherence.