How predictable is the outcome of stocking

Stocking is a technical intervention into aquatic resource systems of great complexity. The outcomes of stocking are determined by natural, institutional and socio-economic conditions which vary greatly between individual systems, and this implies a need to adapt management regimes to local conditions in order to achieve desired outcomes. Prediction of the outcomes of different potential courses of action is a key step in the development of appropriate management regimes. We describe various models that are available to predict outcomes of stocking in technical, institutional and socio-economic terms. Predictions are usually fraught with uncertainties, which may be extremely large in situations where little knowledge of the resource system and previous experience of stocking outcomes exist. It is therefore important to conduct a broad-based diagnosis of the resource system prior to a prediction of stocking outcomes, and to make provision for adaptive learning from management experience, with consequent changes in policies and procedures. In situations of large uncertainty, deliberate management experiments may be conducted to generate the information needed to develop appropriate management regimes. Rigid guidelines for management may prevent adaptive learning and should be avoided unless there is solid empirical evidence for their superiority over alternative regimes that might evolve from the learning process. The role of analysts should be to facilitate and guide the learning process, rather than to devise rigid guidelines on the basis of insufficient information.

[1]  K. Lorenzen Population dynamics and management of culture-based fisheries , 1995 .

[2]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources , 1994 .

[3]  L. Sifa,et al.  Culture and Capture of Fish in Chinese Reservoirs , 1995 .

[4]  M. Hasan,et al.  Community fisheries management of freshwater lakes in Bangladesh , 1996 .

[5]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[6]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[7]  G. Wood Bangladesh: Whose Ideas, Whose Interests? , 1995 .

[8]  P. Muma Appraisal of Projects in Developing Countries: A Guide for Economists , 1990 .

[9]  J. Winpenny,et al.  Values for the environment : a guide to economic appraisal , 1991 .

[10]  Robert S. Pomeroy,et al.  A handbook for rapid appraisal of fisheries management systems (Version 1). , 1996 .

[11]  K. Lorenzen,et al.  The relationship between body weight and natural mortality in juvenile and adult fish: a comparison of natural ecosystems and aquaculture , 1996 .

[12]  Louis W. Botsford,et al.  Optimal fishery policy with artificial enhancement through stocking: California's white sturgeon as an example , 1984 .

[13]  S. S. Silva,et al.  Possible yield-predictive models based on morphometric characteristics and stocking rates for three groups of Chinese reservoirs , 1992 .

[14]  M. Aeron-Thomas,et al.  An Evaluation of Floodplain Stock Enhancement , 1997 .

[15]  S. Tang Institutions and Collective Action: Self-Governance in Irrigation , 1992 .

[16]  Dennis A. Rondinelli,et al.  Development Projects as Policy Experiments: An Adaptive Approach to Development Administration , 1985 .

[17]  Murdoch K. McAllister,et al.  Experimental Design in the Management of Fisheries: A Review , 1992 .

[18]  A. Charles Fishery science: the study of fishery systems , 1995 .