Development and evaluation of a tool for retrospective exposure assessment of selected endocrine disrupting chemicals and EMF in the car manufacturing industry.

OBJECTIVES A system for retrospective occupational exposure assessment combining the efficiency of a job exposure matrix (JEM) and the precision of a subsequent individual expert exposure assessment (IEEA) was developed. All steps of the exposure assessment were performed by an interdisciplinary expert panel in the context of a case-control study on male germ cell cancer nested in the car manufacturing industries. METHODS An industry-specific JEM was developed and automatic exposure estimation was performed based on this JEM. A subsample of exposure ratings was done by IEEA to identify determinants of disagreement between the JEM and the individual review. Possible determinants were analyzed by calculating odds ratios (ORs) of disagreement between ratings with regard to different dimensions (e.g. high versus low intensity of exposure). Disagreement in ≥20% of the sampled exposure ratings with a statistically significant OR was chosen as a threshold for inclusion of the exposure ratings into a final IEEA. RESULTS The most important determinants of disagreement between JEM and individual review were working outside of the production line (disagreement 80%), low probability of exposure (disagreement 25%), and exposure depending on specific activities like usage of specific lacquers (disagreement 32%) for jobs within the production line. These determinants were the selection criteria of exposure ratings for the subsequent final IEEA. CONCLUSIONS Combining a JEM and a subsequent final IEEA for a selected subset of exposure ratings is a feasible and labor-saving approach for exposure assessment in large occupational epidemiological studies.

[1]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Exposure measurement error and its effects , 2008 .

[2]  R Stamm,et al.  MEGA-database: one million data since 1972. , 2001, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[3]  M. Werler,et al.  Use of a job-exposure matrix to assess occupational exposures in relation to birth defects. , 2000, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[4]  A. Olshan,et al.  Occupational exposure assessment in case–control studies: opportunities for improvement , 2002, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[5]  Jun-mo Nam,et al.  Comparison of asbestos exposure assessments by next-of-kin respondents, by an occupational hygienist, and by a job-exposure matrix from the National Occupational Hazard Survey. , 2005, American journal of industrial medicine.

[6]  M. Pollán,et al.  Incidence of testicular cancer and occupation among Swedish men gainfully employed in 1970. , 2001, Annals of epidemiology.

[7]  K. Teschke.  Exposure surrogates: job-exposure matrices, self-reports, and expert evaluations , 2003 .

[8]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  A job-exposure matrix for potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals developed for a study into the association between maternal occupational exposure and hypospadias. , 2002, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  J. Auger,et al.  Environmental, occupational and familial risks for testicular cancer: a hospital-based case-control study. , 2007, International journal of andrology.

[10]  J Siemiatycki,et al.  Costs and statistical power associated with five methods of collecting occupation exposure information for population-based case-control studies. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  M Dosemeci,et al.  Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value? , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  S. Sikka,et al.  Endocrine disruptors and estrogenic effects on male reproductive axis. , 2008, Asian journal of andrology.

[13]  W. Rhomberg,et al.  High frequency of metalworkers among patients with seminomatous tumors of the testis: a case-control study. , 1995, American journal of industrial medicine.

[14]  J. Haines,et al.  International programme on chemical safety , 1996, The Lancet.

[15]  Mustafa Dosemeci,et al.  RE: “DOES NONDIFFERENTIAL MISCLASSIFICATION OF EXPOSURE ALWAYS BIAS A TRUE EFFECT TOWARD THE NULL VALUE?” , 1991 .

[16]  D. Thelle,et al.  Study of cancer incidence among 8530 male workers in eight Norwegian plants producing ferrosilicon and silicon metal. , 1999, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[17]  Bruce K. Armstrong,et al.  Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology , 1992 .

[18]  P. Guénel,et al.  Job exposure matrices in industry. , 1993, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  N. Roeleveld,et al.  Occupational exposure to potential endocrine disruptors: further development of a job exposure matrix , 2009, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[20]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Exposure Assessment in Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology , 2003 .

[21]  D. Hémon,et al.  Studying the performance of a job exposure matrix. , 1993, International journal of epidemiology.

[22]  J Siemiatycki,et al.  Self-assessed versus expert-assessed occupational exposures. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  M. Martin,et al.  Estrogen-like activity of metals in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. , 2003, Endocrinology.

[24]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  A Job-Exposure Matrix for Potential Endocrine- disrupting Chemicals Developed for a Study into the Association between Maternal Occupational Exposure and Hypospadias , 2002 .

[25]  Mustafa Dosemeci,et al.  Inter-rater agreement of assessed prenatal maternal occupational exposures to lead. , 2006, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.