Comparative Study of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Strabismus Surgery in the Management of Lateral Incomitance in Intermittent Exotropia.

PURPOSE To evaluate and compare bilateral asymmetric lateral rectus recession versus unilateral resection-recession surgery in the management of lateral incomitance in intermittent exotropia. METHODS A prospective randomized interventional comparative study was conducted consisting of 80 patients with intermittent exotropia (older than 7 years) having significant lateral incomitance. They were equally divided into two groups by a sealed envelope system. The bilateral group underwent bilateral asymmetric lateral rectus recession and the unilateral group underwent unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection based on post-patch deviation. Parameters assessed were change in horizontal deviation, change in lateral incomitance, binocularity, motility limitation, and complications, if any. Surgical outcome was considered successful if the primary deviation was within ±8 prism diopters (PD) and lateral incomitance was less than 5 PD. RESULTS The mean lateral incomitance preoperatively and postoperatively was 8.3 ± 1.6 and 2.8 ± 2.4 PD in the bilateral group and 8.9 ± 1.4 and 3.7 ± 2.5 PD in the unilateral group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative lateral incomitance between the two groups (P = .25), but a statistically significant difference was observed between preoperative and postoperative lateral incomitance in each group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Both procedures are equally efficacious in achieving acceptable ocular alignment and improving significant lateral incomitance in patients with intermittent exotropia with deviations between 15 and 35 PD without causing significant motility limitation. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XX-XX.].