Variability between methods to determine ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ENA autoantibodies: a collaborative study with the biomedical industry.

This study was performed by the Italian Society of Laboratory Medicine (SIMeL) in order to establish the variability between the different analytical systems currently used in clinical laboratories for the detection of autoantibodies diagnostic of systemic autoimmune disease. Sixteen industrial, and two university laboratories participated in this study which entailed the determination of anti-nuclear (ANA), anti-dsDNA and anti-ENA antibodies in 11 sera from patients with clinically diagnosed systemic rheumatic disease, using reagents produced by these companies and different methodologies (indirect immunofluorescence, immunoenzymatic assay, counterimmunolectrophoresis, immuno and western blotting). We found 93.5% agreement between the methods used for the detection of ANA, 85.2% for anti-dsDNA antibodies, and 86.9% for anti-ENA antibodies. Among the anti-ENA antibodies, regardless of the method used, detection percentages were excellent for anti-RNP and anti-SSB/La (100%), good for anti-SSA/Ro (93%), but unacceptable for the anti-Jo-1 (67%), anti-Scl70 and anti-Sm (47%) antibodies. This further stresses the need for rigorous standardisation of commercial reagents and analytical procedures, as well as the introduction of external quality assessment (EQA) programs, and a complete definition of operative protocols adjusted to the sensitivity and specificity of the various methods.

[1]  R. Winchester,et al.  Reference sera for antinuclear antibodies. I. Antibodies to native DNA, Sm, nuclear RNP, and SS-B/La. , 1982, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  J F Fries,et al.  The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. , 1982, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  E. Bonifacio,et al.  Use of a standard curve improves precision and concordance of antinuclear antibody measurement. , 1987, Journal of clinical & laboratory immunology.

[4]  D. Alarcón-Segovia,et al.  Reference reagents for antinuclear antibodies , 1988 .

[5]  W. V. van Venrooij,et al.  The consensus workshops for the detection of autoantibodies to intracellular antigens in rheumatic diseases. , 1991, Journal of immunological methods.

[6]  R. Smeenk.  Measurement of antibodies to DNA , 1996 .

[7]  P. Charles,et al.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay in the rheumatological laboratory , 1996 .

[8]  R. Maini,et al.  Manual of Biological Markers of Disease , 1996, Springer Netherlands.

[9]  E. Tan.  International cooperative activities in standardization of antinuclear antibodies , 1996 .

[10]  T. E. W. Feltkamp,et al.  Standards and reference preparations , 1996 .

[11]  T. Feltkamp,et al.  Standardisation of the quantitative determination of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) with a homogeneous pattern. , 1988, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  R. Borzì,et al.  Comparison of different methods for the detection of autoantibodies in autoimmune diseases , 1995, International journal of clinical & laboratory research.

[13]  Charles Pj,et al.  The Consensus Workshops for the Detection of Autoantibodies to Intracellular Antigens in Rheumatic Diseases: 1989-1992. , 1992 .

[14]  T. Kirkwood,et al.  The first international standard for antibodies to double stranded DNA. , 1988, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.