Classifier-Based Multi-atlas Label Propagation with Test-Specific Atlas Weighting for Correspondence-Free Scenarios

We propose a segmentation method which transfers the advantages of multi-atlas label propagation (MALP) to correspondence-free scenarios. MALP is a branch of segmentation approaches with attractive properties, which is currently applicable only in correspondence-based regimes such as brain labeling, which assume correspondence between atlases and test image. This precludes its use for the large class of tasks without this property, such as tumor segmentation. In this work, we propose a method which circumvents the correspondence assumption by using a classifier-based atlas representation in the spirit of the recently proposed Atlas Forests (AF). To counteract the negative effects of the over-training property of AF for applications with highly heterogeneous examples, we employ test-specific atlas weighting by the STAPLE approach. The main idea is that over-training ceases to be a problem if the prediction is based only on training atlases which are “similar” to the test image. Here, the “similarity” is based on the estimated ability of an atlas-based classifier to perform a correct labeling. We show a successful use of the proposed method for segmentation of brain tumors on data from the BraTS 2013 Challenge, which presents a correspondence-free scenario in which standard MALP cannot be expected to operate.

[1]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[2]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation Through Fusion of Probabilistic Segmentations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Atlas Encoding by Randomized Forests for Efficient Label Propagation , 2013, MICCAI.

[6]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: Application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  Dong Hye Ye,et al.  Context-sensitive Classication Forests for Segmentation of Brain Tumor Tissues , 2012 .

[8]  Colin Studholme,et al.  A Supervised Patch-Based Approach for Human Brain Labeling , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Self-gated Radial MRI for Respiratory Motion Compensation on Hybrid PET/MR Systems , 2013, MICCAI.

[11]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2012 , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Chengwen Chu,et al.  Multi-organ Abdominal CT Segmentation Using Hierarchically Weighted Subject-Specific Atlases , 2012, MICCAI.